Monday, April 14, 2014

Gentle People:
 Remember when Barack Obama was an idealist? Back in 2008 he made a great speech that inspired millions of people within the U.S.., and around the world. At the time I desperately hoped protecting the environment would be a priority for the Senator and his Democrats. When Obama finally won the White House his new government did make some moves to slow global warming. He changed the CEO of General Motors and that move reduced the gas consumption of G. M. cars...however, that was off-set when...with a minority government bullied by a Republican minority...the Democrats approved deep water off-shore drilling. That move led to a horrific disaster! The 'Deep Water Horizon' oil platform exploded and polluted the Gulf of Mexico.

 Following the U.S. lead, Car makers around the world quickly improved the efficiency of their cars which unfortunately created another problem. The new technology today is so popular that twice as many people are buying Hybrid cars. Unfortunately, the Hybrids continue to burn gas. With twice as many machines, the gas continues to pollute the planet and this consequently is creating global warming!
 On any given Sunday, giant Box Stores on this planet are surrounded by thousands upon thousands of  little cars jammed sardine style together in parking lots. In Bejing China, the pollution is so bad people are wearing hospital masks to protect themselves from tiny particulates. I remember when those humongous parking lots were farmer's fields producing vegetables. In North America you can't see the pollution but Cancer rates are going through the roof!

Here is Barack Obama's great speech.
Page 1 of 3

Article Details for President Barack Obama's Promises. Lets help him keep every one of them and more!
Date 11/05/2008 12:36 AM 12:41 AM

Title President Barack Obama's Promises. Lets help him keep every one of them and more!

President Barack Obama,
Twenty-one months later, my faith in the American people has been vindicated.

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama (Jacksonville, FL)
Jacksonville, FL | November 03, 2008

It's great to be back on the First Coast. I have just one word for you, Florida: tomorrow.

After decades of broken politics in Washington, eight years of failed policies from George Bush, and twenty-one months of a campaign that has taken us
from the rocky coast of Maine to the sunshine of California, we are one day away from change in America.

Tomorrow, you can turn the page on policies that have put the greed and irresponsibility of Wall Street before the hard work and sacrifice of folks on Main
Street.

Tomorrow, you can choose policies that invest in our middle-class, create new jobs, and grow this economy so that everyone has a chance to succeed;
from the CEO to the secretary and the janitor; from the factory owner to the men and women who work on its floor.

Tomorrow, you can put an end to the politics that would divide a nation just to win an election; that tries to pit region against region, city against town,
Republican against Democrat; that asks us to fear at a time when we need hope.

Tomorrow, at this defining moment in history, you can give this country the change we need.

We began this journey in the depths of winter nearly two years ago, on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. Back then, we didn't have
much money or many endorsements. We weren't given much of a chance by the polls or the pundits. We knew how steep our climb would be.

But I also knew this. I knew that the size of our challenges had outgrown the smallness of our politics. I believed that Democrats and Republicans and
Americans of every political stripe were hungry for new ideas, new leadership, and a new kind of politics -one that favors common sense over ideology;
one that focuses on those values and ideals we hold in common as Americans.

Most of all, I knew the American people were a decent, generous people willing to work hard and sacrifice for future generations. I was convinced that
when we come together, our voices are more powerful than the most entrenched lobbyists, or the most vicious political attacks, or the full force of a
status quo in Washington that wants to keep things just the way they are.

Twenty-one months later, my faith in the American people has been vindicated. That's how we've come so far and so close -because of you. That's how
we'll change this country -with your help. And that's why we can't afford to slow down, sit back, or let up, one minute, or one second in the next twenty-
four hours. Not now. Not when so much is at stake.

We are in the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. 760,000 workers have lost their jobs this year. Businesses and families
can't get credit. Home values are falling. Pensions are disappearing. It's gotten harder and harder to make the mortgage, or fill up your gas tank, or even
keep the electricity on at the end of the month.

At a moment like this, the last thing we can afford is four more years of the tired, old theory that says we should give more to billionaires and big
corporations and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. The last thing we can afford is four more years where no one in Washington is
watching anyone on Wall Street because politicians and lobbyists killed common-sense regulations. Those are the theories that got us into this mess.
They haven't worked, and it's time for change. That's why I'm running for President of the United States.

Now, Senator McCain has served this country honorably. And he can point to a few moments over the past eight years where he has broken from
George Bush. But when it comes to the economy -when it comes to the central issue of this election -the plain truth is that John McCain has stood with
this President every step of the way. Voting for the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy that he once opposed. Voting for the Bush budgets that spent us into
debt. Calling for less regulation twenty-one times just this year. Those are the facts.

After twenty-one months and three debates, Senator McCain still has not been able to tell the American people a single major thing he'd do differently
from George Bush when it comes to the economy.

John McCain just doesn't get it. Remember what he said when he was here on September 15th?

That day, more than 5,000 jobs were lost and more than 7,000 homes were foreclosed on. The day before, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said
we were in a "once in a century" crisis.

And yet, despite our economic crisis, John McCain actually came here, to Veterans' Memorial Arena, and repeated something he's said at least sixteen
times on this campaign. He said -and I quote -"the fundamentals of our economy are strong."

Well, Florida, you and I know that's not only fundamentally wrong, it also sums up his out-of-touch, on-your-own economic philosophy. It's a philosophy
that says we should give a $700,000 tax cut to the average Fortune 500 CEO and $300 billion to the same Wall Street banks that got us into this mess.
It's a philosophy that says we shouldn't give a penny of relief to more than 100 million middle-class Americans. And it's a philosophy that will end when I
am President of the United States of America.

Look, we've tried it John McCain's way. We've tried it George Bush's way. Deep down, Senator McCain knows that, which is why his campaign said that
"if we keep talking about the economy, we're going to lose." That's why I'm talking about the economy. That's why he's spent these last weeks calling me
every name in the book. Because that's how you play the game in Washington. When you can't win on the strength of your ideas, you make a big
election about small things.

So I expect we're going to see more of that in the next twenty-four hours. More of the slash and burn, say-anything, do-anything politics that's calculated
to divide and distract; to tear us apart instead of bringing us together. Well, that's not the kind of politics the American people need right now.

Florida, at this moment, in this election, we have the chance to do more than just beat back this kind of politics in the short-term. We can end it once and
for all. We can prove that the one thing more powerful than the politics of anything goes is the will and determination of the American people. We can
change this country. Yes we can.

We can prove that we are more than a collection of Red States and Blue States -we are the United States of America. That's who we are, and that's the
country we need to be right now.

Florida, I know these are difficult times. But I also know that we have faced difficult times before. The American story has never been about things coming
easy -it's been about rising to the moment when the moment was hard. It's about rejecting fear and division for unity of purpose. That's how we've
overcome war and depression. That's how we've won great struggles for civil rights and women's rights and workers' rights. And that's how we'll write the
next great chapter in the American story.

Understand, if we want to meet the challenges of this moment, we need to get beyond the old ideological debates and divides between left and right. We
don't need bigger government or smaller government. We need a better government -a more competent government -a government that upholds the
values we hold in common as Americans.

The choice in this election isn't between tax cuts and no tax cuts. It's about whether you believe we should only reward wealth, or whether we should also
reward the work and workers who create it. I will give a tax break to 95% of Americans who work every day and get taxes taken out of their paychecks
every week. And I'll help pay for this by asking the folks who are making more than $250,000 a year to go back to the tax rate they were paying in the1990s. No matter what Senator McCain may claim, here are the facts -if you make under $250,000, you will not see your taxes increase by a single dime
-not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes, not your capital gains taxes. Nothing. Because the last thing we should do in this economy is raise taxes
on the middle-class.

When it comes to jobs, the choice in this election is not between putting up a wall around America or standing by and doing nothing. The truth is, we
won't be able to bring back every job that we've lost, but that doesn't mean we should follow John McCain's plan to keep promoting unfair trade
agreements and keep giving tax breaks to corporations that send American jobs overseas. I will end those breaks as President, and give them to
companies that create jobs here in the United States of America. We'll create two million new jobs by rebuilding our crumbling roads, and bridges, and
schools. I will invest $15 billion a year in renewable sources of energy -in wind and solar power and the next generation of biofuels. We'll invest in clean
coal technology and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. And we'll create five million new energy jobs over the next decade -jobs that pay well
and can't be outsourced.

When it comes to health care, we don't have to choose between a government-run health care system and the unaffordable one we have now. If you
already have health insurance, the only thing that will change under my plan is that we will lower premiums. If you don't have health insurance you'll be
able to get the same kind of health insurance that Members of Congress get for themselves. And as someone who watched his own mother spend the
final months of her life arguing with insurance companies because they claimed her cancer was a pre-existing condition and didn't want to pay for
treatment, I will stop insurance companies from discriminating against those who are sick and need care most. That's the change we need. That's why
I'm running for President of the United States.

When it comes to giving every child a world-class education, the choice is not between more money and more reform -because our schools need both.
As President, I will recruit an army of new teachers, pay them more, and give them more support. But I will also demand higher standards and more
accountability from our teachers and our schools. And I will make a deal with every American who has the drive and the will but not the money to go to
college: if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford your tuition.

And when it comes to keeping this country safe, we don't have to choose between retreating from the world and fighting a war without end in Iraq. It's
time to stop spending $10 billion a month in Iraq while the Iraqi government sits on a huge surplus. As President, I will end this war. I will ask the Iraqi
government to step up for their future, and I will finally finish the fight against bin Laden and the al Qaeda terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. I will never
hesitate to defend this nation. And I will make sure our servicemen and women have the best training and equipment when they deploy into combat, and
the care and benefits they have earned when they come home. That's what we owe our veterans. That's what I'll do as President.

I won't stand here and pretend that any of this will be easy -especially now. The cost of this economic crisis, and the cost of the war in Iraq, means that
Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending on things we don't need. As President, I will go through the federal budget, line-by-line,
ending programs that we don't need and making the ones we do need work better and cost less.

But as I've said from the day we began this journey, the change we need won't come from government alone. It will come from each of us doing our part
in our own lives and our own communities. It will come from each of us looking after ourselves, our families, and our fellow citizens.

Yes, government must lead the way on energy independence, but each of us must do our part to make our homes and our businesses more efficient.
Yes, we must put more money into our schools, but government can't be that parent who turns off the TV and makes a child do their homework. We need
a return to responsibility and a return to civility. Yes, we can argue and debate our positions passionately, but all of us must summon the strength and
grace to bridge our differences and unite in common effort -black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American; Democrat and Republican, young and old,
rich and poor, gay and straight, disabled or not.

In this election, we cannot afford the same political games and tactics that are being used to pit us against one another and make us afraid of one
another.

Despite what our opponents may claim, there are no real or fake parts of this country. There is no city or town that is more pro-America than anywhere
else -we are one nation, all of us proud, all of us patriots. The men and women who serve on our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and
Independents, but they have fought together and bled together and some died together under the same proud flag. They have not served a Red America
or a Blue America -they have served the United States of America.

It won't be easy, Florida. It won't be quick. But you and I know that it is time to come together and change this country. Some of you may be cynical and
fed up with politics. You have every right to be. But despite all of this, I ask of you what has been asked of Americans throughout our history.

I ask you to believe -not just in my ability to bring about change, but in yours.

I know this change is possible. Because I have seen it over the last twenty-one months. Because in this campaign, I have had the privilege to witness
what is best in America. I've seen it in the faces of the men and women I've met at countless rallies and town halls across the country, men and women
who speak of their struggles but also of their hopes and dreams.

I still remember the email that a woman named Robyn sent me after I met her in Ft. Lauderdale. Sometime after our event, her son nearly went into
cardiac arrest, and was diagnosed with a heart condition that could only be treated with a procedure that cost tens of thousands of dollars. Her insurance
company refused to pay, and their family just didn't have that kind of money.

In her email, Robyn wrote, "I ask only this of you -on the days where you feel so tired you can't think of uttering another word to the people, think of us.
When those who oppose you have you down, reach deep and fight back harder."

Florida, that's what hope is.

That's what kept some of our parents and grandparents going when times were tough. What led them to say, "Maybe I can't go to college, but if I save a
little bit each week, my child can. Maybe I can't have my own business but if I work really hard my child can open up one of her own." It's what led those
who could not vote to say "if I march and organize, maybe my child or grandchild can run for President someday."

That's what hope is -that thing inside that insists, despite all evidence to the contrary, that there are better days ahead. If we're willing to work for it. If
we're willing to shed our fears. If we're willing to reach deep inside ourselves when we're tired, and come back fighting harder.

Don't believe for a second this election is over. Don't think for a minute that power concedes. We have to work like our future depends on it in the next
twenty-four hours, because it does.

But I know this, Florida, the time for change has come. We have a righteous wind at our back.

And if in these final hours, you will knock on some doors for me, and make some calls for me, and go to barackobama.com and find out where to vote. If
you will stand with me, and fight by my side, and cast your ballot for me, then I promise you this -we will not just win Florida, we will not just win this
election, but together, we will change this country and we will change the world. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless America.









Thursday, April 10, 2014

Dear President Putin:

 Over the years you restored a certain amount of stability to Russia. With a small amount of love and friendship you could have created a lasting peace with all your neighbours, including the Ukraine and the West. Today that trust is shattered! Nobody likes the military actions you have taken. It is a shame that after all your hard work, you are destabilizing the East and creating another cold war with the West...and for what? Money and power and territory! I thought you were a smarter leader than that! Napoleon tried that method and so did Hitler and Stalin and every other tyrant in history. None of them succeeded!
 The struggle for money and power leads to war and to death for millions of people. Do you want history to compare you to Hitler and Stalin? Up until now the Americans were labelled war mongers but today, with your soldiers lined up at the border of Ukraine and the world watching you, it is time you reconsider the consequences of  your actions. It is not too late to undo the social damage you have created and to regain a certain amount of respect. Remove the soldiers from the border and give back to Ukraine the land you have taken by force. Pretend it never happened and pleasantly surprise the world! You distributed Russian Passports to thousands of Ukraine citizens, great! Let them keep the Russian passports. Duel citizenship is a good opportunity for most people. In fact, distribute millions more Russian Passports to anybody in the Ukraine who wants one but do not destabilize the Ukraine government or attempt a military take over of the Ukraine territory. That is an international crime which will not be forgiven by the United Nations.
The majority of people within the Ukraine do not want to join or be controlled and dominated by Russia. Nobody likes to be controlled and dominated by outside forces. Please realize that fact and do what is right.
Thank You for reading this message!
Signed: Joseph Raglione
Executive Director: The World Humanitarian Peace and Ecology Movement.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

  • Hello gentle people:

  •  My home province of Quebec, Canada, is in a sorry state! We have allowed U.S. television marketing to dominate our lives and to replace our religious indoctrination...not that I like religious indoctrination...with hair shampoo and fast cars. We have replaced the strange ritualistic rules imposed on us by strange ritualistic human beings known as priests and ministers and guru's, with sales people. Our new temples of worship today include giant box stores surrounded by thousands of polluting gas burning little vehicles parked tightly together.  Except for fun holidays based on religion, I exchanged my religious concepts for fact based science concepts years ago. In fact I remember how it was directly after achieving puberty. NASA scientists are today my literal "high" priests.
  •  The exchange was painful. The authorities of my past were cruel bastards who disliked losing their authority. School principals swung short hard rubber straps to beat the concepts of freedom and creativity out of stubborn school children, however, the exchange was worth the effort. With that said, Happy Easter every body! If you are religious do not forget how God and Jesus Christ want you to stop polluting the Earth! If you are not religious, remember global warming and exchange your gas burning car for an all electric vehicle. After that plant a Tree and create a garden...or go visit a forest and worship nature.
  • Tesla Motors | Premium Electric Vehicles

    www.teslamotors.com/en_CA
    Tesla designs and manufactures premium electric vehicles. Tesla produces the TeslaRoadster, an electric super car, and the Model S sedan, available in 2012.
  • Buy or Reserve a Tesla | Tesla Motors

    www.teslamotors.com/en_CA/own
    You don't need to be near a store to order a Tesla - just use the online order form to reserve a Model S or start the Roadster purchasing process.
  • Tesla Charging | Tesla Motors

    www.teslamotors.com/charging
    The charger is on-board the car and converts AC power from the wall to DC power stored in the battery. Model S can be configured with a Single Charger (10 ...
  • Tesla Adds Titanium Underbody Shield and Aluminum Deflector ...

    www.teslamotors.com/.../tesla-adds-titanium-underbody-shield-and-alum...
    Mar 28, 2014 - In 2013, two extremely unusual Model S collisions resulted in underbody damage that led to car fires. These incidents, unfortunately, received ...
  • Your Questions Answered | Tesla Motors

    www.teslamotors.com/goelectric
    Model S has two battery options. The largest battery supplies 300 miles of range at 55 MPH. How you drive affects how far you can go. How far will YOU go?
  • True Cost of Ownership | Tesla Motors

    www.teslamotors.com/true-cost-of-ownership
    We also encourage you to think about Model S ownership in terms of true out of pocket cost. When considering the savings from using electricity instead of ...
  • Sunday, March 30, 2014

    Gentle People:

     It has become a crowded world. Millions of people move and inter-mingle with each other every single day and one sad fact is that ( aside from text messaging on tiny computers) personal communication has dropped dramatically. For one example, you can stand in a crowded bus and be absolutely jammed tight against a fellow passenger and except for a few words like sorry and excuse me, zero conversation takes place. For another example you can go to a football or baseball game and shout and cheer for hours and never talk to the person in the next seat. Put simply, over-population and crowding creates less direct communication with our neighbours, especially in large cities. Add poverty to the mix and you create serious social problems affecting the most vulnerable inner-city women, children and the elderly.
    Here is a Poem you might like..I call it The Hypocrite.

    The Hypocrite.
     Every day I would say hello
    As I passed him on this street,
    And every day he would look at me and say
    "Now my life's complete!"

    Years went by and here I am
    Sitting in his place,
    And you kid now wear
    My smile on your face...

    So thank you kid
    For the smile,
    Though it's not very deep...,

    This seat I will keep warm for you...
    Now my life's complete.

    Copyright: Joseph Raglione.



    Tuesday, March 25, 2014

    Gentle People:
     For years non-profit organizations have been raising money for genetic Cancer research. The fact that
    less than ten percent of Cancers are genetic related has not bothered to slow fund raisers.
    Millions of Dollars continue to flow into Cancer research. Sadly, the truth is in plain sight. All anyone has to do is look in car parking lots for the main cause of Cancer. 

     Cancers created by toxic industrial pollution continue to be ignored by Oil and Gas companies. Countries like Russia and Canada continue to damage the environment by pumping and digging Oil from the ground. Internal combustion machines continue to dominate the open market supported by millions of dollars of Media marketing hype and only Japan has made a concerted effort to bring out all Electric clean machines to the open market. The following is a message from the WHO.
    ======================================== 

    Air pollution linked to seven million deaths globally


    From The World Health Organization.
     The World Health Organization estimates that Seven million people died as a result of air pollution in 2012.
    Its findings suggest a link between air pollution and heart disease, respiratory problems and cancer.
    One in eight global deaths were linked with air pollution, making it "the world's largest single environmental health risk", the WHO said.
    Nearly six million of the deaths had been in South East Asia and the WHO's Western Pacific region, it found.

    “Start Quote

    The evidence signals the need for concerted action to clean up the air we all breathe”
    Dr Maria Neira WHO
    The WHO said about 3.3 million people had died as a result of indoor air pollution and 2.6 million deaths were related to outdoor air pollution, mainly in low- and middle-income countries in those regions.
    'Heavy price' WHO public health, environmental and social determinants of health department director Dr Maria Neira said: "The risks from air pollution are now far greater than previously thought or understood, particularly for heart disease and strokes.
    "Few risks have a greater impact on global health today than air pollution.
    "The evidence signals the need for concerted action to clean up the air we all breathe."
    Reducing air pollution could save millions of lives, said the WHO.
    WHO family, woman and children's health assistant director-general Dr Flavia Bustreo said: "Cleaning up the air we breathe prevents non-communicable diseases as well as reduces disease risks among women and vulnerable groups, including children and the elderly.
    "Poor women and children pay a heavy price from indoor air pollution since they spend more time at home breathing in smoke and soot from leaky coal and wood cook stoves."
    'Robust and accurate' The WHO assessment found the majority of air pollution deaths were linked with cardiovascular diseases.
    For deaths related to outdoor pollution, it found:
    • 40% - heart disease
    • 40% - stroke
    • 11% - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
    • 6% - lung cancer
    • 3% - acute lower respiratory infections in children
    For deaths related to indoor pollution, it found:
    • 34% - stroke
    • 26% - heart disease
    • 22% - COPD
    • 12% - acute lower respiratory infections in children
    • 6% - lung cancer
    University of Birmingham professor of environmental and respiratory medicine Jon Ayres said the review needed to be taken seriously.
    "The estimates for the impact of outdoor air pollution are robust and as accurate as can be developed at the moment," he said.
    The WHO estimates were based on:
    • satellite data
    • ground-level monitoring
    • modelling how pollution drifts in the air
    • pollution-emissions data

    More on This Story

    Related Stories

    Thursday, March 13, 2014

    Attention industrial polluters, after reading the following (IPCC) article can you guess what will happen to your children and grand children? Do you still want to continue pumping carbon monoxide and CO2 into the atmosphere? Do you still want to sell polluting cars on Television and on the Internet?
    ======================================================================

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that sea levels will rise between 0.18 and 0.59 meters (0.59 to 1.9 feet) by 2099 as warming sea water expands, and mountain and polar glaciers melt. These sea level change predictions may be underestimates, however, because they do not account for any increases in the rate at which the world’s major ice sheets are melting. As temperatures rise, ice will melt more quickly. Satellite measurements reveal that the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets are shedding about 125 billion tons of ice per year—enough to raise sea levels by 0.35 millimeters (0.01 inches) per year. If the melting accelerates, the increase in sea level could be significantly higher impacting Ecosystems. More importantly, perhaps, global warming is already putting pressure on ecosystems, the plants and animals that co-exist in a particular climate zone, both on land and in the ocean. Warmer temperatures have already shifted the growing season in many parts of the globe. The growing season in parts of the Northern Hemisphere became two weeks longer in the second half of the 20th century. Spring is coming earlier in both hemispheres. This change in the growing season affects the broader ecosystem. Migrating animals have to start seeking food sources earlier. The shift in seasons may already be causing the lifecycles of pollinators, like bees, to be out of synch with flowering plants and trees. This mismatch can limit the ability of both pollinators and plants to survive and reproduce, which would reduce food availability throughout the food chain. See Buzzing About Climate Change to read more about how the lifecycle of bees is synched with flowering plants. Warmer temperatures also extend the growing season. This means that plants need more water to keep growing throughout the season or they will dry out, increasing the risk of failed crops and wildfires. Once the growing season ends, shorter, milder winters fail to kill dormant insects, increasing the risk of large, damaging infestations in subsequent seasons. In some ecosystems, maximum daily temperatures might climb beyond the tolerance of indigenous plant or animal. To survive the extreme temperatures, both marine and land-based plants and animals have started to migrate towards the poles. Those species, and in some cases, entire ecosystems, that cannot quickly migrate or adapt, face extinction. The IPCC estimates that 20-30 percent of plant and animal species will be at risk of extinction if temperatures climb more than 1.5° to 2.5°C. Impacting People The changes to weather and ecosystems will also affect people more directly. Hardest hit will be those living in low-lying coastal areas, and residents of poorer countries who do not have the resources to adapt to changes in temperature extremes and water resources. As tropical temperature zones expand, the reach of some infectious diseases, such as malaria, will change. More intense rains and hurricanes and rising sea levels will lead to more severe flooding and potential loss of property and life. Photograph of beach erosion in Massachusetts, 2007. One inevitable consequence of global warming is sea-level rise. In the face of higher sea levels and more intense storms, coastal communities face greater risk of rapid beach erosion from destructive storms like the intense nor’easter of April 2007 that caused this damage. (Photograph ©2007 metimbers2000.) Hotter summers and more frequent fires will lead to more cases of heat stroke and deaths, and to higher levels of near-surface ozone and smoke, which would cause more ‘code red’ air quality days. Intense droughts can lead to an increase in malnutrition. On a longer time scale, fresh water will become scarcer, especially during the summer, as mountain glaciers disappear, particularly in Asia and parts of North America. On the flip side, there could be “winners” in a few places. For example, as long as the rise in global average temperature stays below 3 degrees Celsius, some models predict that global food production could increase because of the longer growing season at mid- to high-latitudes, provided adequate water resources are available. The same small change in temperature, however, would reduce food production at lower latitudes, where many countries already face food shortages. On balance, most research suggests that the negative impacts of a changing climate far outweigh the positive impacts. Current civilization—agriculture and population distribution—has developed based on the current climate. The more the climate changes, and the more rapidly it changes, the greater the cost of adaptation. Ultimately, global warming will impact life on Earth in many ways, but the extent of the change is largely up to us. Scientists have shown that human emissions of greenhouse gases are pushing global temperatures up, and many aspects of climate are responding to the warming in the way that scientists predicted they would. This offers hope. Since people are causing global warming, people can mitigate global warming, if they act in time. Greenhouse gases are long-lived, so the planet will continue to warm and changes will continue to happen far into the future, but the degree to which global warming changes life on Earth depends on our decisions now. References Anthes, R.A., Corell, R.W., Holland, G., Hurrell, J.W., MacCracken, M.C., & Trenberth, K. (2010, February 12). Hurricanes and Global Warming—Potential Linkages and Consequences. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 87: 623-628. Accessed April 15, 2010. Arctic Council. (2004). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Report. Accessed March 22, 2007. Balachandran, N., Rind, D., Lonergan, P., & Shindell, D. (1999). Effects of solar cycle variability on the lower stratosphere and the troposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(D22), 27, 321-327, 339. Bender, M. A., Knutson, T. R., Tuleya, R. E., Sirutis, J. J., Vecchi, G. A., Garner, S. T., and Held, I. M. (2010). Modeled Impact of Anthropogenic Warming on the Frequency of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes. Science, 327(5964), 454-458. Bonan, G. B. (2008). Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests. Science, 320(5882), 1444-1449. Cazenave, A. (2006). How fast are the ice sheets melting? Science, 314, 1251-1252. Clement, A.C., Burgman, R., Norris, J.R. (2009, July 24) Observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback. Science, 325 (5939), 460-464. Dessler, A., Zhang, Z., Yang, P. (2008, October 23). Water-vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003-2008. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L20704. Emanuel, K. (2005). Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature, 436, 686-688. Foucal, P., Frölich, C., Spruit, H., and Wigley, T. (2006). Variations in solar luminosity and their effect on the Earth’s climate. Nature, 443, 161-166. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Kharecha, P., Lacis, A., Miller, R., Nazarenko, L., et al. (2007). Climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS model E. Climate Dynamics, 29(7), 661-696. Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., Willis, J., Del Genio, A., Koch, D., Lacis, A., Lo, K., Menon, S., Novakov, T., Perlwitz, J., Russell, G., Schmidt, G.A., and Tausnev, N. (2005, June 3). Earth’s energy imbalance: confirmation and implications. Science, 308, 1431-1435. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers. A Report of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Summary for Policymakers. A Report of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Joint Science Academies. (2005). Joint Science Academies’ Statement: Global Response to Climate Change. June 2005. Jouzel, J., Masson-Delmotte, V., Cattani, O., Dreyfus, G., Falourd, S., Hoffmann, G., Minster, B., et al. (2007). Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years. Science, 317(5839), 793-796. Labitzke, K., Butchart, N., Knight, J., Takahashi, M., Nakamoto, M., Nagashima, T., Haigh, J., et al. (2002). The global signal of the 11-year solar cycle in the stratosphere: observations and models. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 64(2), 203-210. LaštoviÄŤka, J., Akmaev, R. A., Beig, G., Bremer, J., & Emmert, J. T. (2006). ATMOSPHERE: Global Change in the Upper Atmosphere. Science, 314(5803), 1253-1254. Lau, K. M., and H. T. Wu. (2007). Detecting trends in tropical rainfall characteristics, 1979-2003. International Journal of Climatology, 27. Lean, J. L., & Rind, D. H. (2009). How will Earth’s surface temperature change in future decades? Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L15708. Lean, J. L., & Rind, D. H. (2008). How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(18). Luthcke, S.B., Zwally, H.J., Abdalati, W., Rowlands, D.D., Ray, R.D., Nerem, R.S., Lemoine, F.G., McCarthy, J.J., and Chinn, D.S. (2006). Recent Greenland ice mass loss by drainage system from satellite gravity observations. Science, 314, 1286-1289. Mann, M. E., Zhang, Z., Hughes, M. K., Bradley, R. S., Miller, S. K., Rutherford, S., & Ni, F. (2008). Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13252-13257. Manvendra K. Dubey, Petr Chylek, Charlie S. Zender, & Chris K. Folland. (2010, February 12). Global Warming and the Next Ice Age. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89 (12), 1905-1909. McGranahan, G., D. Balk and B. Anderson. (2007). The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment & Urbanization, 19 (1), 17-37. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. Oren, R., Ellsworth, D. S., Johnsen, K. H., Phillips, N., Ewers, B. E., Maier, C., Schafer, K. V., et al. (2001). Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature, 411(6836), 469-472. Ramanathan, V., & Feng, Y. (2008). On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(38), 14245-14250. Rind, D., Lean, J.L., Lerner, J., Lonergan, P., and Leboissetier, A. (2008). Exploring the stratospheric/tropospheric response to solar forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D24103. Robock, A., Marquardt, A., Kravitz, B., & Stenchikov, G. (2009). Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L19703. Sabine, C. L. (2004). The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO2. Science, 305(5682), 367-371. Schimel, D. (2007). Carbon cycle conundrums. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(47), 18353-18354. Seager, R., Ting, M., Held, I., Kushnir, Y., Lu, J., Vecchi, G., Huang, H., et al. (2007). Model Projections of an Imminent Transition to a More Arid Climate in Southwestern North America. Science, 316(5828), 1181-1184. Shepherd, A., and Wingham, D. (2007). Recent sea-level contributions of the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets. Science, 315, 1529-1532. Soden, B. J. and Held, I.M. (2006, July). An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. Journal of Climate, 19: 3354-3360. Stainforth, D. A., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Collins, M., Faull, N., Frame, D. J., Kettleborough, J. A., et al. (2005). Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 433(7024), 403-406. U.S. Climate Change Science Program. (April 2006). Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere. Accessed April 13, 2007. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Climate Change. Accessed March 22, 2007. U.S. Geological Survey. (2009, December 29). Volcanic gases and their effects. Volcano Hazards Program. Accessed March 29, 2010. Velicogna, I., and Wahr, J., (2006). Measurements of time-variable gravity show mass loss in Antarctica. Science, 311 (5768), 1754-1756. Weir, J. (2002, April 8). Global Warming. Earth Observatory. Accessed April 13, 2007. Related Reading United States Global Change Research Program. Real Climate Introduction Global Warming How is Today’s Warming Different from the Past? Is Current Warming Natural? How Much More Will Earth Warm? How Will Global Warming Change Earth? References and Related Resources Print this entire article Share facebook twitter stumbleupon Google+ pinterest Subscribe Today

    Wednesday, March 12, 2014

    WHAT IS GRAVITY?

    What this philosopher believes is gravity.
     The Earth attracts dust and dirt from space and this creates weight. Earth becomes a heavy mass.  Gravity is created when the mass becomes so dense it creates inward pressure which converts matter to heat energy. Heat is basically created when Atoms speed up. In my opinion, Atoms are forced with pressure to move so fast deep within the centre of the Earth, they convert to hot liquid plasma and break apart, losing sub atomic particles. The more they lose particles, the stronger is the downward pull on surrounding cooler Atoms because nature abhors a vaccuum. This is what I consider to be the pull of gravity...a vacuum effect like water being sucked down the hole in the bath tub. Mass in essence creates compression which in turn creates heat which then accelerates the speed of Atoms which melt and expand surrounding matter which in turn lose sub atomic particles which are so small they can travel up and out through the mass of Earth leaving behind tiny sub atomic vacuums or little black holes. These holes are then filled in with random particles from cooler surrounding Atoms. The process of filling the holes is what I believe to be gravity.

      As sub-atomic holes are filled in, cooler and more solid Atoms are pulled downwards from the surrounding Earth and from Space which creates more mass and more pressure and more heat which creates more plasma and faster Atoms. As tremendous pressure and heat create more sub-atomic holes, more particles are absorbed from cooler surrounding matter and the downward pull we feel on our bodies is the Earth absorbing sub atomic particles like a sponge. This is what I believe to be gravity. It may or not be the case but it makes logical sense to me. What do you think? Signed: Joseph Raglione.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Here is N.A.S.A's version of Black Holes with tremendous gravity.
    NASA-Led Study Explains Decades of Black Hole Observations
    June 14, 2013
     A new study by astronomers at NASA, Johns Hopkins University and the Rochester Institute of Technology confirms long-held suspicions about how stellar-mass black holes produce their highest-energy light.
    "Our work traces the complex motions, particle interactions and turbulent magnetic fields in billion-degree gas on the threshold of a black hole, one of the most extreme physical environments in the universe," said lead researcher Jeremy Schnittman, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

    By analyzing a supercomputer simulation of gas flowing into a black hole, the team finds they can reproduce a range of important X-ray features long observed in active black holes. 
    This animation of supercomputer data takes you to the inner zone of the accretion disk of a stellar-mass black hole. Gas heated to 20 million degrees Fahrenheit as it spirals toward the black hole glows in low-energy, or soft, X-rays. Just before the gas plunges to the center, its orbital motion is approaching the speed of light. X-rays up to hundreds of times more powerful ("harder") than those in the disk arise from the corona, a region of tenuous and much hotter gas around the disk. Coronal temperatures reach billions of degrees. The event horizon is the boundary where all trajectories, including those of light, must go inward. Nothing, not even light, can pass outward across the event horizon and escape the black hole.
    Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
    Music: "Lost in Space" by Lars Leonhard, courtesy of the artist
    › Download video in HD formats
    › Watch video on YouTube

    Gas falling toward a black hole initially orbits around it and then accumulates into a flattened disk. The gas stored in this disk gradually spirals inward and becomes greatly compressed and heated as it nears the center. Ultimately reaching temperatures up to 20 million degrees Fahrenheit (12 million C) - some 2,000 times hotter than the sun's surface - the gas shines brightly in low-energy, or soft, X-rays.

    For more than 40 years, however, observations have shown that black holes also produce considerable amounts of "hard" X-rays, light with energy tens to hundreds of times greater than soft X-rays. This higher-energy light implies the presence of correspondingly hotter gas, with temperatures reaching billions of degrees.

    The new study bridges the gap between theory and observation, demonstrating that both hard and soft X-rays inevitably arise from gas spiraling toward a black hole.

    Working with Julian Krolik, a professor at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and Scott Noble, a research scientist at the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, N.Y., Schnittman developed a process for modeling the inner region of a black hole's accretion disk, tracking the emission and movement of X-rays, and comparing the results to observations of real black holes.

    Noble developed a computer simulation solving all of the equations governing the complex motion of inflowing gas and its associated magnetic fields near an accreting black hole. The rising temperature, density and speed of the infalling gas dramatically amplify magnetic fields threading through the disk, which then exert additional influence on the gas.

    The result is a turbulent froth orbiting the black hole at speeds approaching the speed of light. The calculations simultaneously tracked the fluid, electrical and magnetic properties of the gas while also taking into account Einstein's theory of relativity.

    Running on the Ranger supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center located at the University of Texas in Austin, Noble's simulation used 960 of Ranger's nearly 63,000 central processing units and took 27 days to complete.

    Over the years, improved X-ray observations provided mounting evidence that hard X-rays originated in a hot, tenuous corona above the disk, a structure analogous to the hot corona that surrounds the sun.

    "Astronomers also expected that the disk supported strong magnetic fields and hoped that these fields might bubble up out of it, creating the corona," Noble explained. "But no one knew for sure if this really happened and, if it did, whether the X-rays produced would match what we observe."

    Using the data generated by Noble's simulation, Schnittman and Krolik developed tools to track how X-rays were emitted, absorbed, and scattered throughout both the accretion disk and the corona region. Combined, they demonstrate for the first time a direct connection between magnetic turbulence in the disk, the formation of a billion-degree corona, and the production of hard X-rays around an actively "feeding" black hole.

    A paper reporting the findings was published in the June 1 edition of The Astrophysical Journal.

    In the corona, electrons and other particles move at appreciable fractions of the speed of light. When a low-energy X-ray from the disk travels through this region, it may collide with one of the fast-moving particles. The impact greatly increases the X-ray's energy through a process known as inverse Compton scattering.

    "Black holes are truly exotic, with extraordinarily high temperatures, incredibly rapid motions and gravity exhibiting the full weirdness of general relativity," Krolik said. "But our calculations show we can understand a lot about them using only standard physics principles."

    The study was based on a non-rotating black hole. The researchers are extending the results to spinning black holes, where rotation pulls the inner edge of the disk further inward and conditions become even more extreme. They also plan a detailed comparison of their results to the wealth of X-ray observations now archived by NASA and other institutions.

    Black holes are the densest objects known. Stellar-mass black holes form when massive stars run out of fuel and collapse, crushing up to 20 times the sun's mass into compact objects less than 75 miles (120 kilometers) wide.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A message from Joseph Raglione.
      I believe there is a connection between density and gravity.




      Hello my good friend Valdemar Oliveira! I am happy to hear you had a successfull heart operation.  I hope you live to be 110. I may not be...