Thursday, May 12, 2016

Guess who will be the next president of the U.S.A. Trump of course!


POLITICS

Hillary Clinton Is Now The Most Religious Candidate Running For President. Here’s Why That Matters.

 MAY 6, 2016 8:00 AM

CREDIT: AP PHOTO/MATT ROURKE
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks at the African Episcopal Church of St. Thomas in Philadelphia.


During a town hall campaign event in Iowa this past January, a woman stood and asked Hillary Clinton an unusually blunt question about faith. The woman, a high school guidance counselor, said she identifies as both a Democrat and a Catholic Christian, but expressed frustration about having to defend her support for Clinton to conservative friends who insist that progressivism and Christianity are incompatible. How, she asked, does Clinton — a self-identified Methodist Christian who also happens to be one of America’s most famous Democrats — grapple with the same question, and how does her faith in things such as the Ten Commandments square with her left-leaning politics?
It’s a deeply personal question that many politicians would dodge, or at least explain away with a platitude about the value of faith and family. So it came as a bit of a surprise when the famously on-message Clinton, whose demeanor and accent criticsoften dismiss as duplicitous and disingenuous, launched into a lengthy, nuanced, and uncharacteristically unscripted articulation of her faith.
“Thank you for asking that. I am a person of faith. I am a Christian. I am a Methodist,” Clinton responded. “My study of the Bible … has led me to believe the most important commandment is to love the Lord with all your might and to love your neighbor as yourself, and that is what I think we are commanded by Christ to do. And there is so much more in the Bible about taking care of the poor, visiting the prisoners, taking in the stranger, creating opportunities for others to be lifted up … I think there are many different ways of exercising your faith.”


“I do believe that in many areas judgment should be left to God, that being more open, tolerant and respectful is part of what makes me humble about my faith,” she added. “I am in awe of people who truly turn the other cheek all the time, who can go that extra mile that we are called to go, who keep finding ways to forgive and move on.”
This thoughtful, conciliatory approach to religion rarely makes headlines these days, but it should sound familiar to millions of America’s so-called “Mainline Christians” — devotees of older, overwhelmingly white, and often liberal-leaning Christian denominations such as the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Presbyterian Church (USA), or Clinton’s own United Methodist Church (UMC).
Rooted in a firm theological embrace of “social justice,” this strain of religious thought contrasts sharply with Clinton’s Republican opponent. With preacher’s son Ted Cruz and the often pastoral John Kasich dropping out of the race for the White House this week, the GOP flock has winnowed to Donald Trump, a man whose grasp of the spiritual is dubious at best. Unlike virtually every other Republican nominee from the past three decades, The Donald is infamous for his bumbling inability tospeak coherently about the Bible, much less his own theological beliefs, earning him scorn from an uncommonly ecumenical consistory of critics: right-wing evangelical leaders, heads of Trump’s own Presbyterian denomination, and even Pope Francishave all condemned the businessman’s uneven approach to matters divine.
Not so with Clinton, whose longstanding dedication to Methodism is well documented, and whose support among certain faith constituencies is years in the making. In fact, set alongside Bernie Sanders’ devotion to secular Judaism, Clinton currently occupies an unusual position in American politics: she, a Democrat, is now the most overtly religious candidate running for president in 2016.
The importance of Clinton’s faith is often lost among America’s increasingly bifurcated media echo chamber, where right-wing outlets insist liberals cannot possibly be Christian and left-wing writers unleash (un)righteous indignation at debate moderators simply for asking Democratic candidates about their prayer life. But as Clinton inches ever closer to becoming the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party, it’s worth reflecting on how deeply her theological beliefs impact her worldview — and her politics.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton preaches at Foundry United Methodist Church in September 2015.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton preaches at Foundry United Methodist Church in September 2015.
CREDIT: AP PHOTO/MOLLY RILEY

Pushed leftward by a spiritual mentor

Hillary Clinton, born Hillary Rodham, grew up in the Chicago suburb of Park Ridge, Illinois the eldest child of middle-class parents Hugh and Dorothy Rodham. Like many families, politics was a touchy subject: Hugh, a conservative small business owner and outspoken Barry Goldwater supporter, was a Republican, while Dorothy was a “closeted Democrat.” But while the two differed quietly on politics, they found common ground in a shared devotion to Methodism, a tradition rooted in the teachings of minister and theologian John Wesley.
“I was born into a Methodist family  —  parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, claiming to go all the way back to the coalfields hearing the Wesleys preach,” Clintonsaid in a 2015 sermon, referencing how Wesley traveled throughout the United States in the mid-18th century preaching to the poor.


Eager to pass on their faith, the family became members of First United Methodist Church in Park Ridge. The congregation mirrored its suburban surroundings — conservative, mostly white, and primarily concerned with the immediate community. Yet it was there that Clinton first encountered social justice-minded theology at the hands of Don Jones, the church’s youth pastor who would influence her for years to come. Under Jones, Clinton was reportedly exposed to theologians such as Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich, Christian thought leaders who, while not especially radical (Niebuhr is the favorite theologian of both John McCain and Barack Obama), stressed the need for humanity to care for the less fortunate.
“Don opened up a new world to me, and helped guide me on a spiritual, social and political journey of over 40 years,” Clinton said in 2009.
Using these writers and the Bible as a framework, Jones arranged trips and events that wrenched Clinton out of her suburban bubble. He convened discussions on drugs, crime, and teenage pregnancy; took his youth on field trips to Chicago’s South Side to confront issues of poverty and race; and in 1962, as the African American Civil Rights movement swept the United States, Jones drove Clinton and others to hear Martin Luther King, Jr. speak in Chicago's Orchestra Hall.
“Here she is in the middle to upper-middle class church in Chicago, and along comes this youth minister that has been rocked a little bit from the 1960s, and he’s got this passion for social action,” Burns Strider, a friend of Clinton’s and faith outreach director for her 2008 campaign, told ThinkProgress. “And he starts loading up all those suburban kids, dragging them into the city, and making them work on soup lines. Hillary was captivated to the core by it.”
Although Jones’ spiritual tutelage expanded Clinton’s social consciousness, it didn’t turn her into raging liberal overnight. When she attended Wellesley College after high school, she served as president of the school’s Young Republicans club and identified as a “Goldwater Girl.”
But Clinton never forgot Jones’ lessons, and once sent him an angst-written letter in which she complained that other students rejected her chosen identity as “a mind conservative and a heart liberal.” It was one of the first hints of what would become Clinton’s lifelong project of slow-moving liberalization, a glacial shift that roughly matched the United Methodist Church’s own methodical trudge leftward over the course of several decades.
Hillary Clinton sings during service at Mount Zion Fellowship Church in Highland Hills, Ohio.
Hillary Clinton sings during service at Mount Zion Fellowship Church in Highland Hills, Ohio.

A public theology rooted in private conviction

Clinton’s Methodism remained a powerful part of her identity throughout her adult life, but grew into a public force in the 1990s during her tenure as First Lady of the United States. After moving into the White House with her husband Bill — a Baptist — in 1993, the two regularly attended services with their daughter Chelsea at Foundry Methodist Church, a historic congregation near Dupont Circle in Washington, D.C. Pastors and lay leaders enthusiastically welcomed the couple, which Clinton still visits on occasion — sometimes to sit in the pews, sometimes to preach from the pulpit.
“This community  —  because indeed that’s what it is  —  was a place where we could worship, study, contemplate, be of service, get some good pastoral advice, and step outside all the commotion of life in the White House and Washington,” Clinton told the Foundry congregation in 2015. “Here we were, not ‘the First Family’ —  we were just our family. And we relished and cherished that time. We always have felt part of the Foundry family.”
Her faith was never confined to church walls, however. While delivering a speech at the University of Texas in 1993, Clinton coined a phrase — grounded in an explicitly religious framework — that would later grace the cover of the Sunday New York Times Magazine.


“We need a new politics of meaning,” she said. “We have to summon up what we believe is morally and ethically and spiritually correct and do the best we can with God’s guidance.”
Meanwhile, Clinton maintained close ties with the denomination of her birth, the United Methodist Church. She often recites a phrase popular among Methodists and sometimes attributed to John Wesley, citing a version of it during her Super Tuesday victory speech in March 2016.
“Like many of you, I find strength and purpose from my family and my faith,” she said. “They gave me simple words to live by: Do all the good you can for all the people you can for as long as you can.”
She also still regularly speaks to Methodist-only groups, and even addressed the denomination’s national assembly in 1996, delivering a speech that called for a fusion of faith and a social conscience.
“For me, the Social Principles of the Methodist Church have been as much a description of our history, as a prod for my future actions,” she said. “We can find direction, if we look to the church’s call to strengthen families and renew our schools and encourage policies that enable each child to have a chance to fulfill his or her God-given potential.”
Not everything about her faith was for public consumption. According to Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet, she joined an all-female Bible study group in Washington affiliated with the Fellowship (aka, “the Family”), filled with the wives of influential men. Clinton has been relatively tight-lipped about the nature of the group’s discussions, which leaned conservative and believed that people accrue power only through God’s will. But she has acknowledged profound influence on her life, noting that scripture passages sent to her from members guided her throughout her tenure as First Lady.
Neither her denomination nor her conservative friends kept Clinton from taking some progressive positions, of course. An adamant supporter of a woman’s right to choose, she once sparked controversy by suggesting that in countries where women struggle to have access abortions “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” And while Clinton opposed same-sex marriage for years, she had what commentators called an “honest shift” on the issue in 2013,finally endorsing marriage equality after she left her position as Secretary of State. Even as she called for LGBT rights — something many saw as long overdue — Clinton still stressed the need to consider conservative congregations who “struggle to reconcile the teachings of their religion” with same-sex marriage, a possible nod to both the UMC’s ongoing debate over the issue and her own years-long, faith-rooted resistance to endorsing marriage equality.
The core of Clinton’s sometimes quiet faith appears to be rooted not just in high-minded theology, but also in the real, human communities it forges. Strider told ThinkProgress that Clinton would often task him with reaching out to her home church during her 2008 bid for the White House, a job with little political value but of immense personal concern for the then-senator.
“Eight years ago, late on Sunday night or early on Monday mornings, I would get the prayer list from [Clinton’s] home church in Little Rock, Arkansas and pass it on to her,” Strider said. “If someone was hurting, Hillary would call and check on her. She would just go through that prayer list, praying for all these people.”
Hillary Rodham Clinton listens to the sermon by Rev. Richard Dozier during services at the Northminster Presbyterian Church in Columbia, SC, in 2008.
Hillary Rodham Clinton listens to the sermon by Rev. Richard Dozier during services at the Northminster Presbyterian Church in Columbia, SC, in 2008.
CREDIT: AP PHOTO/ELISE AMENDOLA

Faith as a political asset

Clinton’s faith is arguably the most unimpeachably genuine aspect of her public persona, but it has the added benefit of being politically useful. Much has been saidabout her popularity with African American voters during the 2016 primary season, for instance, but less discussed is how both Clintons spent decades reaching out to the churches that included historically black congregations. According to Strider, Clinton regularly attended pentecostal “camp” meetings in Arkansas when her husband was governor, a local gesture that quickly expanded to include meetings throughout the region. The two became recognized regulars at the spiritual events, and earned a reputation as faithful churchgoers among Southern pentecostals — a group that includes many African Americans, a key part of the Democratic machine in the Deep South.
“Any event she does in the South, you’ll find two or three pentecostal ministers behind stage who she already knows and wants to see,” Strider said.
The experience also honed Clinton’s ability to “speak Jesus,” allowing her to develop a spiritual parlance that transcended the white, suburban Methodism of her youth. While visiting Columbia, South Carolina in May 2015, Clinton asked local African American pastor Rev. Frederick Donnie Hunt what Bible verse he was studying. When Hunt replied 1 Corinthians 13, Clinton responded, “Oh I know it well,” and proceeded to recite the verse from memory and offer a short exegesis about its meaning.
Soon thereafter, Hunt announced his support for Clinton’s candidacy.


“I was impressed and glad that she knew the scripture that I was reading and studying at the time,” Hunt later told CNN. “It impressed me that someone running for president has that background. It is important to me that we have a president that has some belief.”
This kind of religious fluency isdownplayed in Democratic circles nowadays, in part because roughly a quarter of left-wing voters now claim no religious tradition and prefer a candidate that never discusses their faith. But the Democratic Party remains a “big tent” that doubles as a revival tent, and a recent Pew poll reported that a full 64 percent of African Americans still think political candidates say too little about their faith.
Hence the CNN exit polls from the 2016 South Carolina Democratic primary, which found that more than 57 percent of voters say they attend worship weekly. By contrast, only 42 percent of Palmetto state citizens overall said they show up to worship weekly in a February Gallup poll — meaning Democratic voters are morelikely to attend church than the average Sandlapper.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, Clinton crushed Sanders in the South Carolina primary, winning 73.5 percent of the vote to his measly 26 percent.
But for all the good Clinton’s faith has done her in the primary season, it may pay far more important dividends if she becomes the official Democratic nominee to challenge Trump in the general election. The business mogul confounded pundits this year by inexplicably accruing support from a subset of the evangelical vote, but that group was eventually revealed to be self-identified conservative Christians who aren’t that religious. More churchgoing evangelicals are far less supportive of the bombastic Trump and his policies — and while theological conservatives are unlikely to flock to a pro-choice and pro-marriage equality candidate, Strider hinted that Clinton’s crossover religious appeal is already swaying a few right-wing voters.
“I’m hearing from men and women clergy that I normally don’t who are wanting to engage in helpful ways for Hillary this time,” Strider said. “It’s pretty exciting … a lot of them are folks who we suspect are pretty open-minded in the ballot box, but would never say it or talk about it publicly. A lot of them are stepping forward this time.”
Political analysts have long associated the phrase “the personal is political” with the Clintons. But this year, the political may also be spiritual.
This article is part of our ongoing series on the faith of presidential candidates. You can find our first entry, which chronicles Gov. Scott Walker’s questionable claims to evangelicalism,here. Check out other pieces on the faith of Donald TrumpBen CarsonMarco RubioTed CruzMartin O’Malley, and Bernie Sanders.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Do I hate upper class billionaires?

 No! I do not hate anybody! I do believe ultra rich corporate bosses can do much better with their wealth than hide it in places like Panama. If you live alone on an island with a fortune in gold and jewels and money, you are still alone on an island. Nobody will do the work for you and your money is useless. I suggest the rich invest their money creating projects and inventions that protect Nature and help the working class maintain the economy. In turn both Nature and the average working person will protect the upper class life style as long as that life style is not abusive. Both ends of the spectrum will benefit otherwise putrid greed will once again implode the economy! Besides that, you can't eat money!
1. We need coastal desalination plants. Yes they are expensive but necessary!
 2. We need clean water distribution pipe lines delivering clean water to farmers and cities. Farmers should stop using pesticides and practice companion planting. I suggest Lentils and Vegetables as their main super crops. Stop Beef and Chicken processing as they do more harm than good.
3. We need cheap apartments for the lower class so they can once again have disposable incomes. I suggest converting useless office towers into apartment buildings. Make sure the buildings are clean and self contained. Hire staff!
4. We need thousands of city buildings containing Hydroponic gardens. Grow Lentils and Spirulina as they are the best foods on Earth. You can also have protected roof-top vegetable and flower gardens.
5. We need buildings that can create and maintain Hydroponic gardens and roof-top gardens. Buildings that can produce their own clean energy with windows that convert sunlight into electricity.
6. We need Electric cars and buses and Bicycle paths to stop global burning!
7. Of course we need new kinds of clean energy. The new Fusion reactors will be great when and if they work, meanwhile, wind Turbines and Solar Panels are becoming popular; especially in Germany which produces 90% of their total energy using clean non polluting methods. If they can do it so can we!
8. Of course we need space ships and satellites and cell phones! Mars awaits!
9. We need free education and why not create schools within giant corporations?  Such educational facilities could be Tax deductible and every company could offer high school and college credits based on their companies line of work as well as a minimum wage page check. The education would be free for the student while they worked for the company and students would be free to change companies for different credits. Today, most companies train their own workers. The training should be both tax deductible and good for a high school or college or university credit. Farmers can once again hire students to help them do farm work and learn Plant Biology for credits. All employees, students or otherwise, must receive fair pay for work achieved.
10. Companies are not people and the "Citizens United" law must be changed. It will create a better U.S. and as a consequence, world economy. Don't panic gentle Billionaires, it won't hurt your power structure. Remember, we are on a tiny little planet Earth, together! You need a comfortable working class and they need you!
11. Worker unions must be created and protected for the benefit of both the worker and the company leadership. A non-religious humanitarian social and economic balance must be achieved. We do not want a world where the rich get richer and the poor die on the streets unless they decide to revolt! Switzerland and Sweden and Norway are great examples of worker unions working with their company bosses and with their respective governments to create a society of healthy and happy people. No, I don't hate the super rich but today they seem to be dominating and creating a society of super poor people while hoarding Billions of Dollars off-shore! Why is that? 

The Root of all Evil!

Gentle readers:

 When I was a boy, religious beliefs dominated the educational and social and political as well as the economic landscape. God was here and there and everywhere and without my full awareness, I was indoctrinated. How deeply indoctrinated did not strike home until years later when I began playing with Lottery machine games.

  My doting Mother dragged me to many religious institutions in my youth and did not care which religious faith or group or cult we joined, or what school she put me in as long as there was a religious belief underlying the institution. I was given religious basics over and over until they sank deep into my subconscious memory. Basics like: Don't kill! Don't steal! Don't cheat! Don't lie! Don't fornicate! Don't gamble! And the years rolled by agonizingly slowly. I suffered mental torture and believed I would remain forever a prisoner of moralizing authorities!

 "Money is the root of all evil!" and  "Don't gamble, you will lose!"  are religiously based concepts that contradict themselves as well as basic logic. For example, if money is the root of all evil then throwing it away seems like a good idea and why not gamble and lose all that evil money? But then came the other moralizing edict. Don't gamble you will lose! If money is evil, so what? Apparently money has changed value over the years and is no longer evil! It is now becoming important and something we must not lose! That means the religious groups of my past were wrong!

 When I discovered lottery gambling machines I quickly lost money and it took a while before I began to win! Surprisingly, it was fun to win! The Dopamine in my brain rewarded me for winning and I continued to play until I lost again. I enjoyed winning the games and I kept on gambling until I realized that I was putting my winnings back into the machines. The machines were allowing  me to win but I was not allowing myself to keep the money. I was putting the money back into the machines so that I could reward myself with Dopamine. It was fun to create the sensation of pleasure and both the sensation of pleasure and my deeply indoctrinated beliefs were guiding me to put the money back! Only later, when I could not afford to pay my debts did the fun stop! Without any fun in life, gambling became like a drug and a way to inject pleasure back into the brain. A vicious cycle of addiction took hold!
   The people who create lottery machines and the games that go into these machines, do understand how addicted gamblers feel about money. They fully understand the probability concept. Allow gamblers to win and most 'probably' they will put their winnings back into the machines. These particular authorities understand how gamblers do not care or value money.

 Addicted gamblers, like drug addicts, care about winning and feeling good. Winning allows the brain chemical Dopamine to re-enforce a good feeling in the brain and when all the money is gone, so what?! Isn't money, after all, the root of all evil and millions of gamblers today are over the age of Sixty. Many were religiously indoctrinated in early childhood.

 As science replaced religion and the economy grew stronger and stronger, money became the central goal for millions of people, except for gamblers and drug addicts. Those who help create gamblers and drug addicts today apparently do value money and they do take and keep the money. Sadly, that continues to make money the root of all evil!  

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Attention Justin Trudeau!



The 4th Largest Economy In The World Just Generated 90 Percent Of The Power It Needs From Renewables

 MAY 9, 2016 4:16 PM

CREDIT: SHUTTERSTOCK

On Sunday, for a brief, shining moment, renewable power output in Germany reached 90 percent of the country’s total electricity demand.
That’s a big deal. On May 8th, at 11 a.m. local time, the total output of German solar, wind, hydropower, and biomass reached 55 gigawatts (GW), just short of the 58 GW consumed by every light bulb, washing machine, water heater and personal computer humming away on Sunday morning. See the graph below, courtesy Agora Energiewende, a German clean energy think tank. (It’s important to note that most likely, not all of that 55 GW could be used at the time it was generated due to system and grid limitations, but it’s still noteworthy that this quantity of power was produced.)
jeremygraph1
CREDIT: COURTESY AGORA ENERGIEWENDE
Here are a few takeaways from this milestone:
Germany is the fourth-largest economy on the planet. Germany’s $3.7 trillion GDP beats the economic output of any other country in Europe or, for that matter, any U.S. state. Sunday’s spike in renewable output shows that wind and solar can keep pace with the demands of an economic powerhouse. What’s more, the growth of clean energy has tracked the growth of Germany’s economy.
jeremy2
Germany is an unlikely leader in solar. Germany ranks second in installed photovoltaic solar capacity, according to the International Energy Agency. Until recently it was the world leader. It’s notable that, on solar, Germany is outpacing the United States, a country four times as populous. What’s more remarkable is that Germany sees about as much sunshine as Alaska.
jeremy3
Individuals are driving Germany’s energy revolution. Sunday’s performance highlights the success of the Energiewende, or “energy transition,” Germany’s push to expand clean energy, increase energy efficiency, and democratize power generation. Smart policies have opened the renewable energy market to utilities, businesses and homeowners. As of 2012, individuals owned more than a third of Germany’s renewable energy capacity.
jeremy4
Germany still gets most of its power from fossil fuels. Sunday’s spike resulted from a combination of reduced demand — a Sunday morning lull in power consumption. It also came from robust supply — an abundance of wind and sunshine to drive up renewable energy output. On average, renewables supply 30 percent of the country’s power. That is nonetheless a huge proportion. By comparison, the U.S. gets just 13 percent of its power from renewables.
jeremy5
Jeremy Deaton writes about climate and energy for Nexus Media. Tweet him your questions at @deaton_jeremy.
TAGS Germany Renewable Energy

Germany has less Sunlight then Canada and so why are they leading the renewable energy revolution? Solar panels and Solar windows can be implemented everywhere in Canada.All we need is an economic plan created by our federal government. Why not copy Germany's?

Monday, May 9, 2016

Vote against exorbitant CEO pay packages.

This sounds interesting! We might be able to curtail multi-million dollar pay checks to CEO's.

BlackRock

Inbox
x

Liz McDowell, SumOfUs.org us@sumofus.org

5:48 PM (7 hours ago)
to Joseph
It's time to stop ridiculous CEO pay packages
While average workers struggle to get by, CEOs take home outrageous multi-million dollar paychecks.

BlackRock -- the world's largest asset manager -- has the power to stop runaway CEO pay. Call on BlackRock to vote against exorbitant CEO pay packages.
Joseph,
In 2014, the average CEO earned 373 times more than the average worker.
While employees at big corporations like Walmart and McDonald’s earn so little they need government help just to pay bills and put food on the table, CEOs are taking home pay packages worth tens of millions.
And every year, these astronomical rewards keep going up.
Luckily, we can do something to stop this. There’s a growing movement of activists, shareholders and everyday investors who are calling on big companies to rein in ridiculous CEO pay deals -- and it’s working. Just last week, BP shareholders voted down the CEO’s $20 million pay package.
And now we have the chance to influence BlackRock, the single largest asset manager in the world.
The investment giant owns shares in almost every public company in the world. BlackRock executives cast votes at thousands of shareholder meetings each year -- and nearly every single time, they approve outrageous pay levels for CEOs.
A BlackRock shareholder has just put forward a shareholder resolution calling for BlackRock to change its voting policy on CEO pay. If the resolution passes at the company’s AGM, it could have a huge impact on CEO pay at hundreds of the world’s biggest companies.
Let's send a strong message to BlackRock that it needs to support this resolution or alienate its customers -- and hurt its bottom line.
Executive pay has been skyrocketing for the last 30 years, while the wages of average workers stagnate. The average CEO now earns nearly 1000% more than in 1978, while average workers earn a pitiful 11% more -- not even enough to keep up with rising costs of living. 
BlackRock thinks it can keep voting to support fat cat CEOs without any backlash, because it doesn't think anyone is paying attention. If we can show that thousands of investors, customers and everyday people are watching, we can force BlackRock to change its stance on CEO pay. 
We’ll deliver your signatures at the AGM on May 26th -- and make sure that BlackRock knows that it can’t continue to vote for skyrocketing CEO pay without facing consequences.
Our shareholder activism is making a real impact. Just last week we gained historic support for a resolution calling on Canada’s biggest tar sands company to disclose its lobbying and political spending. Now we’re taking on the outrageous system of executive pay.
 
Thanks for using your investments for a good cause,
Liz, Lisa and the SumOfUs team

More information:


SumOfUs is a worldwide movement of people like you, working together to hold corporations accountable for their actions and forge a new, sustainable path for our global economy. Please help keep SumOfUs strong by chipping in CA$3 or become a SumOfUs core member with a regular monthly donation.
Have a great idea for a SumOfUs campaign? Start your own petition and the best ones could be emailed to the whole SumOfUs community.
This email was sent to human4us@bell.net. | Unsubscribe

Stephanie Hulse, Greenpeace Canada <stephanie.hulse@greenpeace.ca>

Nelson,   A few months ago, I told you about the City of Montréal’s plans to ban natural gas in new buildings in the Fall of 2024. And I hav...