ARE CANCER PROTOCOLS A BARRIOR FOR TOTAL CANCER CURE?

THE MILLION  DOLLAR QUESTION?

Are Cancer Protocols a barrior for total Cancer cure?

The answer is... YES!

The reason, according to ChatGPT, is that standard clinical protocols often include:

A: Fixed dosing schedules.

B: Fixed drug combinations and

C: Fixed inclusion criteria.

 Protocols are important for protecting the general population from dangerous practices; however, attempting to initiate a new measure outside a fixed protocol often meets with resistance, even if the new measure is proven to work and may completely cure Cancer!

 In my case a total Cancer cure combining: CRISPR-CAS 9 therapy with CHEMO THERAPY and with IMMUNE theraphy is presently blocked by a Protocol barrior allowing only Chemo Therapy.

The problem is that Cancer does not exist in a fixed state. It is  for myself and millions of Cancer patients around the world, a dynamic adaptive system with the ability to kill it's host! Waiting for protocol permission to create a desisive and total cure, can lag years behind biology. Allowing only one chemical infusion method with a survival rate of 15%, such as Chemo therapy, does not cure cancer but it does kill both the cancerous cells and the non-cancerous cells while slowly weakening the patient over years, with side effects. I swear this is true!

 In small doses, Chemo will allow a patient to survive a few short years after the Cancer diagnosis, but it will not cure the Cancer!

"Protocol doesn't "block" a cancer cure intentionally-it constrains the search space." ChatGPI

 A total cure for my G.I. Cancer includes Four systems. Three  are mentioned above working in tandem to totally destroy cancerous genes. The problem is that I need full protocol permission from the government to proceed and we all know how long that takes!

Bye for now!

N.J.R.