Thursday, February 11, 2021

Prime Minister Trudeau is investing Millions in clean transportation.

Main Content

Nouveaux investissements dans le transport en commun pour bâtir des communautés fortes, lutter contre les changements climatiques et créer de nouveaux emplois à travers le Canada 

Les investissements dans les infrastructures de transport en commun permettent de réduire la durée des déplacements des familles et de créer de bons emplois pour la classe moyenne. De plus, ils favorisent la croissance de notre économie et la réduction de la pollution de l’air. Depuis 2015, le gouvernement du Canada a accordé plus de 13 milliards de dollars à 1 300 projets de transport en commun dans des communautés d’un bout à l’autre du pays. C’est le plus vaste investissement dans le transport en commun de l’histoire canadienne. En rebâtissant en mieux après la pandémie mondiale de COVID-19, nous continuerons de faire ces investissements judicieux pour soutenir les Canadiens.

Aujourd’hui, le premier ministre Justin Trudeau a annoncé l’octroi de 14,9 milliards de dollars dans des projets de transport en commun au cours des huit prochaines années. Ceci comprend un financement permanent de 3 milliards de dollars par année qui sera accordé aux communautés canadiennes à compter de 2026-2027. Cette initiative procure aux villes et aux communautés les fonds prévisibles destinés au transport en commun qui leur sont nécessaires pour planifier l’avenir. Elle s’inscrit dans notre plan visant à créer un million d’emplois, à lutter contre les changements climatiques et à rebâtir une économie plus durable et plus résiliente. Ces investissements permettront d’atteindre les objectifs suivants :

Les investissements dans les infrastructures de transport en commun permettront de bâtir des communautés solides à travers le pays et d’améliorer la qualité de vie de tous les Canadiens. Le gouvernement continuera d’investir dans les projets les plus susceptibles d’appuyer notre relance, de créer des emplois pour la classe moyenne, de stimuler la croissance économique et de nous aider à atteindre nos cibles climatiques. Ensemble, nous pouvons créer un Canada plus propre, plus compétitif et plus résilient pour les générations à venir.

Citations

« En investissant dans les infrastructures de transport en commun, nous soutenons de bons emplois pour la classe moyenne, améliorons les déplacements, luttons contre les changements climatiques et contribuons à rendre la vie des Canadiens plus facile et plus abordable. Nous continuerons à faire ce qu’il faut pour assurer la relance de notre économie après la COVID-19 et rebâtir un pays plus résilient pour tout le monde. »

« Alors que nous travaillons à rebâtir en mieux, le moment est venu d’effectuer des investissements ambitieux dans des services de transport en commun modernes et durables à travers le pays, afin de réduire la congestion, de contribuer à la création d'un million d'emplois et de soutenir des communautés plus propres et plus inclusives. Le financement permanent à long terme des services de transport en commun permettra de construire de nouvelles lignes de métro, des trains légers sur rail et des tramways, des autobus électriques et des pistes cyclables. Il contribuera également à améliorer les réseaux de transport en milieu rural. Les Canadiens pourront ainsi se déplacer plus rapidement et de façon plus propre et plus abordable. Enfin, ce financement nous aidera à atteindre la carboneutralité et à assurer un avenir plus durable à nos enfants. »

« Notre gouvernement est résolu à investir dans le transport en commun à travers les communautés du pays. Nous agissons en collaboration avec les administrations municipales et les gouvernements provinciaux et territoriaux afin d’aider les Canadiens à bâtir une économie solide et à créer un environnement propre. »

« Investir dans des modes de transport plus propres et plus abordables fait partie intégrante du plan climatique renforcé du Canada, lequel nous permettra de dépasser notre objectif pour 2030 et d’atteindre la carboneutralité d'ici 2050. Le secteur des transports est à l’origine d’un quart des émissions au Canada. Il faut y effectuer des investissements judicieux dans la lutte contre les changements climatiques, comme ceux que nous avons annoncés aujourd'hui, pour soutenir de bons emplois canadiens, une économie plus forte et une planète plus saine. »

Faits saillants

Produit connexe

Liens connexes

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Removing the host factors.

Highlights

  • Genome-wide CRISPR screens for SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-229E, and HCoV-OC43 host factors
  • Screens correctly identified divergent entry factors for the three coronaviruses
  • Cholesterol and phosphatidylinositol pathways are shared host dependency factors
  • Pharmacological inhibition of host factors reduces coronavirus replication

Summary

The Coronaviridae are a family of viruses that cause disease in humans ranging from mild respiratory infection to potentially lethal acute respiratory distress syndrome. Finding host factors common to multiple coronaviruses could facilitate the development of therapies to combat current and future coronavirus pandemics. Here, we conducted genome-wide CRISPR screens in cells infected by SARS-CoV-2 as well as two seasonally circulating common cold coronaviruses, OC43 and 229E. This approach correctly identified the distinct viral entry factors ACE2 (for SARS-CoV-2), aminopeptidase N (for 229E), and glycosaminoglycans (for OC43). Additionally, we identified phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthesis and cholesterol homeostasis as critical host pathways supporting infection by all three coronaviruses. By contrast, the lysosomal protein TMEM106B appeared unique to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pharmacological inhibition of phosphatidylinositol kinases and cholesterol homeostasis reduced replication of all three coronaviruses. These findings offer important insights for the understanding of the coronavirus life cycle and the development of host-directed therapies.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

The Coronaviridae family includes seven known human pathogens for which there are no approved vaccines and only limited therapeutic options. The seasonally circulating human coronaviruses (HCoV) OC43, HKU1, 229E, and NL63 cause mild, common cold-like respiratory infections in humans (
). However, three highly pathogenic coronaviruses emerged in the last two decades, highlighting the pandemic potential of this viral family (
). Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome and death, with fatality rates between 10%–40% (
). SARS-CoV-2, though less deadly, is far more transmissible than SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV and has been responsible for over 50 million cases and 1.2 million deaths globally as of November 2020 (
). Because of the severity of their impact on global health, it is critical to understand how SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses hijack the host cell machinery during infection and apply this knowledge to develop new therapeutic strategies.
Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses with a genome length of approximately 30 kb. Upon receptor binding and membrane fusion, the viral RNA is released into the cytoplasm, where it is translated to produce viral proteins. Subsequently, the viral replication/transcription complexes form on double-membrane vesicles and generate genome copies. These are then packaged into new virions via a budding process, through which they acquire the viral envelope, and the resulting virions are released from infected cells (
). During these steps, specific cellular proteins are hijacked and play crucial roles in the viral life cycle. For example, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is exploited as the viral entry receptor for NL63, SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2 (
). Additionally, cellular proteases, such as TMPRSS2, cathepsin L, and furin, are important for the cleavage of the viral spike (S) protein of several coronaviruses thereby mediating efficient membrane fusion with host cells (
). Systematic studies have illuminated virus-host interactions during the later steps of the viral life cycle. For example, proteomics approaches revealed comprehensive interactomes between individual coronavirus proteins and cellular proteins (
). Additionally, biotin labeling identified candidate host factors based on their proximity to coronavirus replicase complexes (
). While these studies uncovered physical relationships between viral and cellular proteins, they do not provide immediate information about the importance of these host components for viral replication.
An orthogonal strategy is to screen for mutations that render host cells resistant to viral infection using CRISPR-based mutagenesis. These screens identify host factors that are functionally required for viral infection and could be targets for host-directed therapies (
). In this study, we have performed a genome-wide CRISPR knockout (KO) screen using SARS-CoV-2 (USA/WA-1 isolate) in human cells. Importantly, we expanded our functional genomics approach to distantly related Coronaviridae members in order to probe for commonalities and differences across the family. This strategy can reveal potential pan-coronavirus host factors and thus illuminate targets for antiviral therapy to combat the current and potential future outbreaks. We conducted comparative CRISPR screens for SARS-CoV-2 and two seasonally circulating common cold coronaviruses, OC43 and 229E. Our results corroborate previously implicated host pathways, uncover new aspects of virus-host interaction, and identify targets for host-directed antiviral treatment.

Results

 CRISPR KO Screens Identify Common and Virus-Specific Candidate Host Factors for Coronavirus Infection

Phenotypic selection of virus-resistant cells in a pooled CRISPR KO screen is based on survival and growth differences of mutant cells upon virus infection. We chose Huh7.5.1 hepatoma cells as they were uniquely susceptible to all tested coronaviruses. We readily observed drastic cytopathic effect during OC43 and 229E infection (Figure S1A). Huh7.5.1 also supported SARS-CoV-2 replication but exhibited limited virus-induced cell death (Figures S1B and S1C). To improve the selection conditions for the SARS-CoV-2 CRISPR screen, we overexpressed ACE2 and/or TMPRSS2, which are present at low levels in wild-type (WT) Huh7.5.1 cells (Figure S1D). This led to increased viral uptake of a SARS-CoV-2 S-pseudotyped lentivirus, confirming the important function of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 for SARS-CoV-2 entry (Figure S1E). We ultimately used Huh7.5.1 cells harboring a bicistronic ACE2-IRES-TMPRSS2 construct for the SARS-CoV-2 screen as these cells sustained efficient infection that led to widespread cell death while still allowing the survival of a small number of cells (Figures S1C and S1F). The generated CRISPR KO libraries in Huh7.5.1 and Huh7.5.1-ACE2-IRES-TMPRSS2 cells had virtually complete single-guide RNA (sgRNA) representation prior to the start of the virus challenge but, as expected, were depleted of cells containing sgRNAs against commonly essential fitness genes within 7 days post-library transduction (Figures S1G and S1H) (
).
Figure thumbnail figs1
Figure S1Optimization of Phenotypic Selection of Coronavirus-Infected Huh7.5.1 Cells and Quality Control Metrics for CRISPR Screens, Related to 
The three CRISPR screens—for resistance to SARS-CoV-2, 229E, and OC43—identified a compendium of critical host factors across the human genome (Figure 1A; Table S1). The overall performance of the screens was robust as indicated by the enrichment of multiple individual sgRNAs against the top 10 scoring genes from each screen (Figure S1I). Importantly, the known viral entry receptors ranked among the top hits: ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 and aminopeptidase N (ANPEP) for 229E (Figures 1B and 1C) (
). OC43, unlike the other coronaviruses, does not have a known proteinaceous receptor but primarily depends on sialic acid or glycosaminoglycans for cell entry (
); consistent with this fact, multiple heparan sulfate biosynthetic genes (B3GALT6, B3GAT3, B4GALT7EXT1EXT2EXTL3FAM20BNDST1SLC35B2UGDHXYLT2) were identified in our OC43 screen (Figures 1D and S2A). Several of these genes were also markedly enriched in the SARS-CoV-2 screen (Figures 1B and S2A), which is consistent with a recent report that SARS-CoV-2 requires both ACE2 and cellular heparan sulfate for efficient infection (
). Overall, the identification of the expected entry factors validates the phenotypic selection of our host factor screens.
Figure thumbnail gr1
Figure 1Genome-wide Loss-of-Function Screens in Human Cells Identify Host Factors Important for Infection by SARS-CoV-2, 229E, and OC43

Monday, February 8, 2021

"Cells lacking the genes were protected from infection."

Melanie Ott, Gladstone Institutes


Melanie Ott co-led a study with researchers from Gladstone, the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, UC San Francisco, and Synthego Corporation that points toward ways to treat not only COVID-19, but future coronaviruses that might emerge.


"When a coronavirus—including SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19—infects someone, it hijacks the person’s cells, co-opting their molecular machinery for its own survival and spread. Researchers at Gladstone Institutes and the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, in collaboration with scientists at UC San Francisco (UCSF) and Synthego Corporation, have identified critical molecular processes in human cells that coronaviruses use to survive.

They report, in a study published in the journal Cell, that targeting these processes with drugs may treat not only COVID-19 infections, but other existing and future coronaviruses.

“What is unique about our study is that we didn’t just look at SARS-CoV-2, but other coronaviruses at the same time,” says one of the leaders of the study, Melanie Ott, MD, PhD, director of the Gladstone Institute of Virology. “This gives us a good idea of drug targets that could broadly suppress many coronaviruses.”

A large family of viruses, coronaviruses include common cold viruses as well as more severe viruses. The SARS-CoV virus that caused a deadly SARS epidemic in 2002 was a coronavirus, as is the MERS virus, which has caused outbreaks in the Middle East.

“There have now been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, so it’s clear this virus family has high pandemic potential,” says Andreas Puschnik, PhD, a principal investigator at the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub and the other leader of the study. “COVID-19 is not the last coronavirus infection we’ll be dealing with.”

Comparing and Contrasting Coronaviruses

Like all viruses, coronaviruses can only grow inside host cells; they rely on the host cell’s molecules to multiply. Because of this, the team of researchers want to target human molecules that the viruses use to survive, rather than components of viruses themselves.

In the new study, they infected human cells with either SARS-CoV-2 or two other coronaviruses that cause common colds—and all three viruses killed the cells. Next, the team of researchers mutated the cells using CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology and studied which mutations made the cells less vulnerable to the coronaviruses.

“We reasoned that the few cells that could survive these infections presumably had mutations in host molecules that the viruses use to infect them or to multiply,” explains Puschnik.

Some results were not surprising. For instance, the human ACE2 receptor is known to be required by SARS-CoV-2 to enter human cells. So, cells with a mutation in the ACE2 gene were no longer infected or killed by SARS-CoV2.

But other findings were less expected. The researchers found that certain genetic mutations prevented all three coronaviruses from successfully infecting and killing the cells. These were mutations in genes known to control the balance of two types of lipid molecules in human cells, namely cholesterol and phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PIP).

Cholesterol is needed for some viruses to enter cells, but it hadn’t been studied in the context of coronaviruses when this study started. Similarly, PIP is known to play a role in forming the small vesicles that viruses often use to travel into and around cells, but it had not been directly linked to SARS-CoV-2 before.

A Pathway toward Therapeutics

To verify the importance of the cholesterol and PIP genes for coronavirus infection, the researchers engineered human cells that lack these genes completely and infected them with the virus. Cells lacking the genes were protected from infection by all three coronaviruses. Similarly, when the team used existing compounds to disrupt the balance of PIP or cholesterol, the cells were less susceptible to infection by any of the viruses.

These results suggest that targeting cholesterol or PIP could be a promising strategy to combat multiple coronaviruses.

“For viruses, the traditional view has been that we design drugs against unique viral targets, and that means it takes time to develop a drug each time there’s a new virus,” says Ott, who is also a professor in the Department of Medicine at UCSF. “If we could develop a few broader antiviral drugs that target host cells’ molecules, that would go a long way toward making us better prepared for future pandemic viruses.”

Not all results were the same between the three studied viruses, however. Some human molecules required for SARS-CoV-2 infection weren’t needed by the two common cold coronaviruses, and vice versa. These findings could help explain what makes SARS-CoV-2 more deadly than the other two viruses.

More work is needed to test the effectiveness of drugs targeting PIP and cholesterol, and whether they can effectively stop viral growth without causing dangerous side effects. The team would also like to repeat the screens using other coronaviruses—including the first SARS-CoV and MERS viruses—to determine just how universal the new targets they pinpointed are.

Ott and Puschnik agree that the current study was made possible by researchers from many labs coming together without hesitation. Puschnik has expertise in studying viral host factors, but didn’t have access to a Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) lab required to work with SARS-CoV-2. Ott was spearheading Gladstone’s effort to open such a lab earlier this year and offered to collaborate. Scientists at Synthego provided the engineered cells needed to study the viruses, and Gladstone Senior Investigator Nevan Krogan, PhD, helped analyze the results of the CRISPR-Cas9 screen.

“Everybody was completely willing to roll up their sleeves, pool resources, and work together to help contribute to better understanding COVID-19,” says Puschnik."

Why protecting your airway is important against Covid-19

"WHY IS IT HARDER TO INFECT THE AIRWAY?

"It probably indicates that we’ve evolved defense mechanisms in the airway to not fall completely prey to coronaviruses. Once the virus gains access, it can distribute and disseminate and go into other organs pretty easily, and then we have big problems. The airway epithelium is the first layer of defense. So, in my mind it speaks to the fact that coronaviruses have been around for a while.

What will you learn from manipulating genes with CRISPR? We can figure out which host proteins the virus really needs, because when we get rid of them with CRISPR, the virus can’t replicate. We can also find what we call restriction factors – host proteins that stop the virus from replicating. When we get rid of them, the virus replicates much more. Finding proteins in both of these groups can help us develop new treatments for COVID-19.

WHAT WOULD BE YOUR IDEAL OUTCOME FROM THE PROJECT?

The ideal outcome would be to find a drug target that is effective against SARS-CoV-2 but also other coronaviruses. The advantage of targeting host factors is that some are likely shared between multiple viruses. Finding those host factors can help in developing pan-antivirals which hopefully will be ready to tackle the next pandemic virus on the horizon."

Stephanie Hulse, Greenpeace Canada <stephanie.hulse@greenpeace.ca>

Nelson,   A few months ago, I told you about the City of Montréal’s plans to ban natural gas in new buildings in the Fall of 2024. And I hav...