Thursday, December 20, 2018

Where courage lives in space.


Expedition 57
Dec. 20, 2018
RELEASE 18-121

NASA Astronaut, Crewmates Return to Earth After 197-Day Mission in Space

Expedition 57 crew members Sergey Prokopyev of Roscosmos, Serena Auñón-Chancellor of NASA, and Alexander Gerst of ESA
Expedition 57 crew members Sergey Prokopyev of the Russian space agency Roscosmos, Serena Auñón-Chancellor of NASA, and Alexander Gerst of ESA (European Space Agency) emerge one at a time from the Soyuz MS-09 that carried them home from the International Space Station Dec. 20, 2018, after a 197-day mission. The spacecraft touched down in Kazakhstan at 12:02 a.m. EST, marking the end of a voyage that took them around the globe 3,152 times, covering 83.3 million miles.
Credits: NASA Television
Three members of the International Space Station’s Expedition 57 crew, including NASA astronaut Serena Auñón-Chancellor, returned to Earth Thursday, safely landing at 12:02 a.m. EST (11:02 a.m. local time) in Kazakhstan.
Auñón-Chancellor and her crewmates, Expedition 57 Commander Alexander Gerst of ESA (European Space Agency) and Soyuz Commander Sergey Prokopyevlaunched June 6 and arrived at the space station two days later to begin their mission. Over 197 days, they circled the globe 3,152 times, covering 83.3 million miles.
For the last 16 days of her mission, Auñón-Chancellor was joined by fellow NASA astronaut Anne McClain, marking the first time in which the only two U.S. astronauts on a mission both were women.
Serena Auñón-Chancellor of NASA after landing on Dec. 20, 2018.
Serena Auñón-Chancellor of NASA rests in a chair after she, Alexander Gerst of the European Space Agency, and Sergey Prokopyev of Roscosmo, landed in their Soyuz MS-09 capsule in a remote area near the town of Zhezkazgan, Kazakhstan on Dec. 20, 2018. Auñón-Chancellor, Gerst, and Prokopyev are returning after 197 days in space where they served as members of the Expedition 56 and 57 crews onboard the International Space Station.
Credits: NASA/Bill Ingalls
The Expedition 57 crew contributed to hundreds of experiments in biology, biotechnology, physical science and Earth science aboard the world-class orbiting laboratory. Highlights included investigations into new cancer treatment methods and algae growth in space. The crew also installed a new Life Sciences Glovebox, a sealed work area for life science and technology investigations that can accommodate two astronauts.
This was the first flight for Auñón-Chancellor and Prokopyev and the second for Gerst, who – with a total of 362 days in orbit – now holds the flight duration record among ESA astronauts.
Prokopyev completed two spacewalks totaling 15 hours and 31 minutes. During a 7 hour, 45 minute spacewalk Dec. 11, he and Oleg Kononenko of Roscosmos retrieved patch samples and took digital images of a repair made to the habitation module of the Soyuz MS-09 in which the Expedition 57 trio rode home. The space station crew located and, within hours of its detection, repaired a small hole inside the Soyuz in August. The spacecraft was thoroughly checked and deemed safe for return to Earth.
When the Soyuz undocked at 8:40 p.m. Dec. 19, Expedition 58 began aboard the station, with McClain, David Saint-Jacques of the Canadian Space Agency, and Kononenko comprising a three-person crew. The next residents on the space station – Nick Hague and Christina Koch of NASA and Alexey Ovchinin of Roscosmos – will launch Feb. 28 from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan to join their crewmates, marking the start of Expedition 59.
For more than 18 years, humans have lived and worked continuously aboard the station, advancing scientific knowledge and demonstrating new technologies, making research breakthroughs not possible on Earth that will enable long-duration human and robotic exploration into deep space. A global endeavor, more than 230 people from 18 countries have visited the unique microgravity laboratory that has hosted more than 2,400 research investigations from researchers in more than 103 countries.
Keep up with the International Space Station, its research and crews at:
Get breaking news, images and features from the station on Instagram and Twitter at:
and
-end-
Stephanie Schierholz
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1100
stephanie.schierholz@nasa.gov
Gary Jordan
Johnson Space Center, Houston
281-483-5111
gary.j.jordan@nasa.gov
Last Updated: Dec. 20, 2018
Editor: Karen Northon

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Pride, courage and love. Shared by Corina Marinescu.

The Last Letter of a Kamikaze Pilot

My Thoughts,
I am keenly aware of the tremendous personal honor involved in my having been chosen to be a member of the Army Special Attack Corps, which is considered to be the most elite attack force in the service of our glorious fatherland.

  My thoughts about all these things derive from a logical standpoint which is more or less the fruit of my long career as a student and, perhaps, what some others might call a liberal. But I believe that the ultimate triumph of liberty is altogether obvious. As the Italian philosopher Benedetto Croce has proclaimed, “liberty is so quintessential to human nature that it is absolutely impossible to destroy it. “I believe along with him that this is a simple fact, a fact so certain that liberty must of necessity continue its underground life even when it appears, on the surface, to be suppressed—it will always win through in the end.

  It is equally inevitable that an authoritarian and totalitarian nation, however much it may flourish temporarily, will eventually be defeated. In the present war we can see how this latter truth is borne out in the Axis Powers themselves. What more needs to be said about Fascist Italy? Nazi Germany too has already been defeated, and we see that all the authoritarian nations are now falling down one by one, exactly like buildings with faulty foundations. All these developments only serve to reveal all over again the universality of the truth that history has so often proven in the past: men’s great love of liberty will live on into the future and into eternity itself.
Although there are aspects to all this which constitute something the fatherland has reason to feel apprehensive about, it is still a truly wonderful thing to feel that one’s own personal beliefs have been validated. On every front, I believe that ideologies are at the bottom of all the fighting that is going on nowadays. Still further, I am firmly convinced that the outcome of each and every conflict is predictable on the bases of the ideologies held by the opposing sides. 
  My ambitious hope was to have lived to see my beloved fatherland—Japan—develop into a great empire like Great Britain in the past, but that hope has already been dashed. If those people who truly loved their country had been given a fair hearing, I do not believe that Japan would be in its present perilous position. This was my ideal and what I dreamt about: that the people of Japan might walk proudly anywhere in the world.
  In a real sense it is certainly true that a pilot in our special aerial attack force is, as a friend of mine has said, nothing more than a piece of the machine. He is nothing more than that part of the machine which holds the plane’s controls—endowed with no personal qualities, no emotions, certainly with no rationality—simply just an iron filament tucked inside a magnet itself designed to be sucked into an enemy air-craft carrier. The whole business would, within any context of rational behavior, appear to be unthinkable, and would seem to have no appeal whatsoever except to someone with a suicidal disposition. I suppose this entire range of phenomena is best seen as something peculiar to Japan, a nation of spirituality. So then we who are nothing more than pieces of machinery may have no right to say anything, but we only wish, ask, and hope for one thing: that all the Japanese people might combine to make our beloved country the greatest nation possible.
  Were I to face the battles that lie ahead in this sort of emotional state, my death would be rendered meaningless. This is the reason then, as I have already stated, that I intend to concentrate on the honor involved in being designated a member of the Special Attack Corps.
When I am in a plane perhaps I am nothing more than just a piece of the machine, but as soon as I am on the ground again I find that I am a complete human being after all, complete with human emotions—and passions too. when the sweetheart whom I loved so much passed away, I experienced a kind of spiritual death myself. Death in itself is nothing when you look upon it, as I do, as merely a pass to the heaven where I will see her once again, the one who is waiting there for me.
  Tomorrow we attack. It may be that my genuine feelings are extreme—and extremely private! But I have put them down as honestly as I can. Please forgive me for writing so loosely and without much logical order. Tomorrow one believer in liberty and liberalism will leave this world behind. His withdrawing figure may have a lonely look about it, but I assure you that his heart is filled with contentment.
  I have said everything I wanted to say in the way I wanted to say it. Please accept my apologies for any breach of etiquette. Well,then.
—Captain Ryoji Uehara
Uehara was killed during an attack on the US Fleet at the Battle of Okinawa, May 11th, 1945. He was 22 years old. Among his personal effects was a book on philosophy by Benedetto Croce, in the cover of which he had written,
“Goodbye, my beloved Kyoko-chan. I loved you so much;but even then you were already engaged, so it was very painful for me.Thinking only of your happiness,I suppressed the urge to whisper into your ear. That I loved you. I love you still.” 

The first men on the Moon.

Apollo 11 was the spaceflight that landed the first two people on the Moon. Commander Neil Armstrong and Lunar Module Pilot Buzz Aldrin, both American, landed the lunar module Eagle on July 20, 1969, at 20:17 UTC. Armstrong became the first person to step onto the lunar surface six hours after landing on July 21 at 02:56:15 UTC; Aldrin joined him about 20 minutes later. They spent about two and a quarter hours together outside the spacecraft, and collected 47.5 pounds (21.5 kg) of lunar material to bring back to Earth. Command Module Pilot Michael Collins piloted the command module Columbia alone in lunar orbit while they were on the Moon's surface. Armstrong and Aldrin spent 21.5 hours on the lunar surface before rejoining Columbia in lunar orbit.
Apollo 11 was launched by a Saturn V rocket from Kennedy Space Center on Merritt Island, Florida, on July 16 at 13:32 UTC, and was the fifth crewed mission of NASA's Apollo program. The Apollo spacecraft had three parts: a command module (CM) with a cabin for the three astronauts, and the only part that returned to Earth; a service module (SM), which supported the command module with propulsion, electrical power, oxygen, and water; and a lunar module (LM) that had two stages – a descent stage for landing on the Moon, and an ascent stage to place the astronauts back into lunar orbit.
After being sent to the Moon by the Saturn V's third stage, the astronauts separated the spacecraft from it and traveled for three days until they entered lunar orbit. Armstrong and Aldrin then moved into Eagle and landed in the Sea of Tranquillity. The astronauts used Eagle's ascent stage to lift off from the lunar surface and rejoin Collins in the command module. They jettisoned Eagle before they performed the maneuvers that blasted them out of lunar orbit on a trajectory back to Earth. They returned to Earth and splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on July 24 after more than eight days in space.
Armstrong's first step onto the lunar surface was broadcast on live TV to a worldwide audience. He described the event as "one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind." Apollo 11 effectively ended the Space Race and fulfilled a national goal proposed in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy: "before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth."
mewe.com/i/francemichaud_knapp
Photo

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Groucho Marx at his funniest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VckmK-ZCpAU



Grouch Marx at his best! Gut wrenching funny! There is only one problem and that is you need to be at least Seventy Plus to understand all the subtle jokes and sexual innuendos.

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Watch out for flying Monkeys!

Welcome to the Barking Up The Wrong Tree weekly update for December 16th, 2018.


How To Avoid Toxic People: 5 Simple Secrets That Will Make You Happier


***


e79e9247-b124-4c70-b043-f2020fa3da6e.jpg

Before we commence with the festivities, I wanted to thank everyone for helping my first book become a Wall Street Journal bestseller! To check it out, click here.


***


Click here to read the post on the blog or keep scrolling to read in-email.

e8e88112-8dbc-4259-a8a8-d768a032d344.jpg

We all know a few people that treat causing grief like it's a career. It's as if your life is a video game and they were put here just to make finishing this level harder.

These aren't simple jerks or someone having a bad day; these are folks with deep-seated problems. Serious interpersonal dysfunction. Lack of social awareness. And, perhaps most notably, an inability to change.

The DSM-5 says that roughly 15% of people meet the criteria for a personality disorder. And most of them are never diagnosed. Now you're not a psychiatrist and neither am I, so we shouldn't run around diagnosing people...

But we can learn enough to recognize if someone is a "high-conflict person", reasonably give a diagnosis of "no good for moi" and steer clear of them.

So what are the three most pernicious flavors of high-conflict people?

Narcissistic HCPs:

They often seem very charming at first but believe they are hugely superior to others. They insult, humiliate, mislead, and lack empathy for their Targets of Blame. They also demand constant undeserved respect and attention from everyone…  According to a 2008 report of a National Institutes of Health study, more than 6 percent of the general population has the disorder. That’s more than twenty-two million people in North America.

Borderline HCPs:

They often start out extremely friendly—but they can suddenly and unpredictably shift into being extremely angry. When this shift occurs, they may seek revenge for minor or nonexistent slights… The speed with which they turn from seeming to love you to hating you is breathtaking… A 2008 report of a National Institutes of Health study indicates that nearly 6 percent of the general population has BPD.

Antisocial (or Sociopathic/Psychopathic) HCPs:

They can be extremely charismatic—but their charm is a cover for their drive to dominate others through lying, stealing, publicly humiliating people, physically injuring them, and—in extreme cases—murdering them… The large NIH study...determined that 3.6 percent of the population has this disorder. That’s about thirteen million people in North America.

I do want to emphasize that these are disorders. These people are suffering. They're not necessarily bad people. I don't want to contribute to mental health stigma -- but you need to protect yourself.

Any responsible mental health professional would advise you to keep your distance from people with these problems, if at all possible. Their disorders aren't going away without serious help, and until they get it, they have the potential to seriously screw your life up.

So how do we learn how to identify and avoid them? Let's get tips from an expert...

Bill Eddy is a licensed clinical social worker that has provided therapy to patients in psychiatric hospitals for more than a decade. He has taught negotiation and mediation at the University of San Diego School of Law and serves as adjunct faculty at the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution at Pepperdine University.

His book is 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life: Identifying and Dealing with Narcissists, Sociopaths, and Other High-Conflict Personalities.

We’re gonna cover the three that are likely to cause the biggest problems for you.

Let’s get to it...


The 4 Behavior Patterns Of High Conflict People


Everybody has bad days. Or bad weeks. So how can you tell if someone is coping with some temporary issues or if they are truly an oh-my-god-watch-out-high-conflict-person?

Look for these four patterns of behavior:

1) Lots of all-or-nothing thinking

HCPs tend to see conflicts in terms of one simple solution (i.e., everyone doing exactly what the HCP wants). They don’t—and perhaps can’t—analyze the situation, hear different points of view, and consider several possible solutions. Compromise and flexibility seem impossible for them.

2) Intense or unmanaged emotions

HCPs tend to become very emotional about their points of view. They often catch everyone else by surprise with their sudden and intense fear, sadness, yelling, or disrespect. Their responses can be way out of proportion to whatever is happening or being discussed, and they often seem unable to control their own emotions.

3) Extreme behavior or threats

HCPs frequently engage in extreme negative behavior. This might include shoving or hitting someone; spreading rumors and outright lies about them; trying to have obsessive contact with them… There are also some HCPs who use emotional manipulation to hurt others but can appear very emotionally in control while they do it… They often seem clueless about how their behavior has a devastating and exhausting emotional impact on others.

4) A preoccupation with blaming others

The single most common—and most obvious—HCP trait is how frequently and intensely they blame other people, especially people close to them and people who seem to be in positions of authority over them.

If somebody does one of these four, hey, nobody's perfect. But if someone routinely exhibits all 4? Almost certainly an HCP.

It's always a good idea to take some time getting to know people. Especially before trusting, hiring, or marrying them. Learn about their personal history, preferably from sources other than merely them.

Yes, some people have had a run of bad luck and their past is marked by problems and bad relationships. But nobody has consistent bad luck for decades. This is probably not someone who has tragically gone from problem situation to problem situation; this is probably Patient Zero.

And if you seriously suspect someone is an HCP, under no circumstances should you accuse them of being a narcissist, borderline or antisocial. You might as well write “please ruin my life” on your forehead.

(To learn more about how you and your children can lead a successful life, check out my bestselling book here.)

So you have suspicions about someone. Specifically, what should you look for? Scrutinize their words, emotions and behavior. Let's start with words...


Words To Look For


Each type gives clues if you listen closely:
  • Narcissistic HCPs: Anything that indicates arrogance, entitlement, and a lack of empathy. They see the world as made up of winners and losers.
  • Borderline HCPs: Victim narratives will be front and center. You'll feel bad for them because it seems like their life keeps burning down (but they'll neglect to mention they're an arsonist).
  • Antisocial HCPs: They will probably attempt to break the record for most lies told in a single conversation.
But all three will eventually display blaming of others, all-or-nothing thinking, victim stories, and a desire to punish.

From 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life:

Watch out for words that grab your attention, especially a pattern of all-or-nothing language. “You always . . .” “You never . . .” “It’s my way or the highway!” “It’s ALL your fault!” Keep in mind that we all say these things occasionally. It’s the pattern and intensity of frequently speaking and writing this way that should grab your attention.

(To learn how to deal with passive-aggressive people, click here.)

So you know what words to look for. But even more telling are emotions...


Emotions To Look For


Extreme ones. Extreme charm, extreme love, and extreme anger are all signs of possible trouble.

Or someone who is tightly controlled with their emotions until -- BOOM. They lose it. And suddenly they're so unrecognizable that you skip telling them to calm down and consider calling an exorcist.

The other emotions to stay aware of are your own. How are they making you feel? Many people end up in toxic romantic relationships with narcissists or borderlines and wonder how it happened. Those powerful feelings they experienced weren't love -- they were emotional manipulation.

Anytime you feel extreme emotions with someone you barely know, it pays to slow things down and be a bit circumspect. So what are you most likely to feel with each type?

With Narcissistic HCPs:

Do you feel stupid or otherwise inadequate around the person? Do you feel in awe of the person and amazed that he or she is spending time with you? ...Does it feel like this person has lost interest in you or now insults you in front of others?

When astronomers finally discover the center of the universe, narcissists will be shocked they are not it.

With Borderline HCPs:

Do you feel extremely frustrated with the person, like you want to shake them or yell at them to get them to stop behaving in some inappropriate way? ...Are you amazed that your emotions swing back and forth so extremely with this person?

If you wonder how the fully grown adult in front of you has suddenly become the most emotionally overwrought manipulative adolescent imaginable, seeming to cycle through completely different personalities faster than you can change channels on your TV, that's a borderline.

With Antisocial HCPs:

Do you sometimes feel a sense of danger just being around this person? Do you sometimes get a cold, creepy feeling when this person is around? Do other people tell you that this person can’t be trusted and is a con artist?

If you've wondered, "Is there anything this person wouldn't say to get what they want?" Helloooooo, antisocial.

(To learn the 4 harsh truths that will make you a better person, click here.)

Emotions are good signs. But nothing beats behavior...


Behavior To Look For


This can seem tricky because there's no exhaustive list. But there is a simple method you can use that's quite effective: the "90% rule."

From 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life:

When you see something extremely negative, ask yourself: Would 90 percent of people ever do this? If the answer is no, you are almost always watching a high-conflict personality in action.

Yes, they're going to make excuses. Wasn't my fault, I had a rough day, the dog ate my homework and it was the aliens that built the pyramids. It'll always be something.

But the most dangerous excuses are the ones you might find yourselfmaking to explain such bad behavior. This means you're already under their spell...

So relay the story to an objective third party and ask their honest opinion to make sure you're not in denial about what kind of person you've been dealing with.

(To learn how to make your life awesome, click here.)

Okay, at this point you know they are officially a 100% USDA-approved high-conflict person. (Um... congratulations?) So what do you do now?

No further contact. Period.

But, sadly, that is not always an option. So here's a simple 4-step method for handling that next encounter...


Use "CARS"


No, Lightning McQueen, we're not talking about the Pixar movie. It's an acronym:
  • Connect with empathy, attention, and respect
  • Analyze alternatives or options
  • Respond to misinformation or hostility
  • Set limits on high-conflict behavior
First, make sure you're calm. You don't want to be reactive and you don't want to show any negativity. (And that can prove verychallenging with these people.)

Ready? Alright, let's walk through the 4 steps...

1) CONNECT WITH ATTENTION, EMPATHY, AND RESPECT

With narcissists and antisocials, emphasize respect. With borderlines, focus on empathy.

From 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life:

“I can see this is a frustrating situation. [Empathy] Tell me more—I want to understand what’s happening from your point of view. [Attention] I have a lot of respect for your efforts to resolve this problem. [Respect]”

Always communicate in a way that you would like them to mirror.

2) ANALYZE ALTERNATIVES OR OPTIONS

Always deal with the problem at hand by presenting them with choices. It gives them the illusion of autonomy and control, which will reduce further conflict.

From 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life:

Talk about options or choices that the person has. You can turn anything into a choice, which makes the person feel more empowered and more respected. For example: Suppose a narcissistic HCP has just dropped in or called you, demanding attention. You could respond: “I can help you right now, but only for about five minutes. Next week, if we schedule it, I can spend about an hour with you on this. It’s up to you.” This approach helps you turn their demand into a choice, so that you can limit their disruption of your time while they still feel respected and considered.

3) RESPOND TO MISINFORMATION OR HOSTILITY

Use a "BIFF response" -- brief, informative, friendly and firm.

From 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life:

This is what I call a BIFF response: It’s brief (just a sentence or paragraph), informative (just straight information, not defensiveness), friendly (keeps the tone nonadversarial), and firm (meaning it ends the potentially hostile discussion).

4) SET LIMITS ON HIGH-CONFLICT BEHAVIOR

If your boundaries seem arbitrary they will almost certainly try and steamroll you. Narcissists will demand, borderlines will cry, and antisocials will turn on the charm.

So make sure your limits come from an external source outside your control: "I'd love to give you what you want but my boss/spouse/dominatrix just won't let me."

From 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life:

That’s why you can’t just say no; you have to back it up with firm boundaries and clear consequences for violating them. You may need to set limits on the topics you will discuss, the amount of time you will spend together, the tasks you will do or not do for them, and so forth. In practice, we do this with everyone we meet, but people who are not high-conflict types intuitively understand our limits and normally don’t violate them… Make it clear that the limit isn’t about them; explain how your schedule, your boss, or other external circumstances require you to set this limit, and hold it firmly in place.

And make sure to never trigger the deepest fear of an HCP while dealing with them:
  • Narcissistic HCPs fear disrespect. Of course, they act like jerks and people inevitably lose respect for them.
  • Borderline HCPs fear abandonment. Of course, they are a nonstop emotional rollercoaster that makes everyone run away from them as soon as humanly possible.
  • Antisocial HCPs fear control. So they break every rule and often end up in prison, utterly controlled.
(To learn the 4-step morning ritual that will make you happy all day, click here.)

Okay, we've covered a lot. Let's round it all up and talk about the dangers of flying monkeys. Yes, I said "flying monkeys"...


Sum Up


This is how to avoid toxic people:
  • Behavior patterns to look for: Blaming, all-or-nothing thinking, playing the victim and unmanaged emotions.
  • Words to look for: "I blame you for not paying more attention to what I wrote above. You never, ever read what I write, do you? I feel so victimized by you skimming this page. And one day I'll get back at you. Just you wait..."
  • Emotions to look for: Your own. If you're having extreme ones -- even if they're positive -- be wary.
  • Behavior to look for: 90% of people would not kick an old lady down a flight of stairs. (Even if she did have it coming.)
  • Use "CARS": Connect, Analyze Options, Respond with BIFF, Set Limits.
So what's a flying monkey? If you're thinking "Wizard of Oz", you get the reference. They're the ones that did the Wicked Witch's dirty work.

Flying monkeys are people under the spell of the HCP. They fell for one of the victim stories -- and in this narrative you're the bad guy. HCP's love a good smear campaign.

So the flying monkey thinks they're being a good friend, coming to the aid of their beleaguered pal, and attacking you -- that horrible, horrible person. This can lead to rumors spread around the office or social circles that make you look bad and probably aren't easily traceable back to their source, the HCP.

The flying monkey is probably a decent person just trying to "do the right thing" for their "friend." And if you unload on them, you'll look like the monster you've been portrayed as. If you say mean things about the HCP, you'll just prove your guilt. So what do you do when confronted by a flying monkey?

First off, be nice. Second, the only way to break the spell and clear your name is to provide verifiable, accurate information about the evildoings of the HCP. It's no guarantee, but if you keep your cool and only say things that will check out, you may be able to free them from the Wicked Witch's mind control -- and get yourself an ally.

One final, very important point: don't let all this make you paranoid.

Most people are good. But if someone gets your Spidey-Sense tingling, pay attention to their words, notice your emotions, try the 90% rule, use CARS -- and be nice to flying monkeys.

In the end, the only way to truly win with toxic people is not to play.


Please share this on Facebook or Pocket. Thank you!


facebook.pngPocket


Email Extras


Findings from around the internet...

+ Want to know how to find your calling in life? Click here.

+ Want to know a simple but powerful learning technique? Click here.

+ Want to know if breakfast really is the most important meal of the day? Click here.

+ Miss last week's post? Here you go: New Neuroscience Reveals 9 Rituals That Will Make You An Amazing Parent. And the cheat sheet PDF I promised in last week's email is here.

+ Want to know the best type of exercise to improve your mood? Click here.

+ You made it to the end of the email. That was wonderfully low-conflict of you. Thanks for making this more pleasant than most of my relationships. You're such a wonderful listener. Alrighty, Crackerjack Time... The great and powerful David Epstein (author of the NYT bestseller The Sports Gene) has a new book coming out next year that I think is a must-read. If 10,000 hours of practicing anything sounds painful and you're more of a generalist than a specialist, you will love this book. I'll be bothering you more about it in the coming months, rest assured, because it's *that* good. Check out "Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World" here.

Thanks for reading!
Eric

Monday, December 3, 2018

Gentle People:

 Governments and companies always look for ways to make a profit. OK, if profit making ideas are what they want and need for success, the following is one magnificent profit making idea!

 Create hundreds of vertical Fifty-Story glass covered Hydroponic Green Houses and then hire students to work the Green Houses. Sell and distribute the vegetables grown in these vertical farms to restaurants throughout the city. Use the new Electricity generating Glass panels to supply energy for the Green House Towers. These special Glass panels create electricity when ordinary day-light passes through them and the energy is then focused into batteries for the building.

 With these towers of food you are creating both clean pesticide free vegetables and work for students.

 P.S. Your present city towers are filled with people attempting to generate money and no matter how much money they make, they cannot eat money. In the future average citizens may find it difficult to buy salad from other countries. They can, however, make money selling salad if they grow their own within vertical farms. You can even place these towers on farm lands and give today's farmers a fighting chance to make a profit without pesticides or working Sixteen hour days!!

 Thanks for reading.
  Pass on this idea.
  Signed: Nelson J. Raglione.   

Deciding the value of every effort.

Study reveals how the brain decides to make an effort
From deciding to quit hitting the snooze button and get out of bed in the morning to opting to switch off the TV and prepare for sleep at night, the mind weighs the costs versus benefits of each choice we make. A study reveals the mechanics of how the brain makes value effort decisions, calculating whether it is worth expending effort in exchange for potential rewards.

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) published the findings by psychologists at Emory University.

“We showed that the brain’s ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which was not previously thought to play a key role in effort-based choices, actually appears to be strongly involved in the formation of expectations underlying those choices,” says Emory psychologist Michael Treadway, senior author of the paper.

Treadway’s lab focuses on understanding the molecular and circuit-level mechanisms of psychiatric symptoms related to mood, anxiety and decision-making.

“Understanding how the brain works normally when deciding to expend effort provides a way to pinpoint what’s going on in disorders where motivation is reduced, such as depression and schizophrenia,” he says.

Previous research had observed three brain regions in decision-making; the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), the anterior insula (aI) and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Studies had pointed to the vmPFC as central to the computation of subjective value during probability decision-making. But prior evidence also suggested that when it comes to decisions about effort expenditure, those subjective value estimates were not computed by the vmPFC but by the other two brain regions.

A limitation to previous studies on effort-based choices is that they simultaneously presented the costs and benefits of a choice to experimental subjects.

“In the real world, however, we usually have to make decisions based on incomplete information,” says Amanda Arulpragasam, first author of the PNAS paper and a psychology PhD candidate in Treadway’s lab.

Arulpragasam designed a study that allowed the researchers to model distinct neural computations for effort and reward.

Subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing an effort-based decision-making task where the effort costs and rewards of a choice were presented separately over time.

The subjects could choose to make no effort and receive $1, or make some level of physical effort in exchange for monetary rewards of varying magnitude, up to $5.73. The physical effort involved rapid button pressing at varying percentages of each participant’s maximum button pressing rate. Participants were required to press the button using their non-dominant pinkie finger, making the task challenging enough to be unpleasant, although not painful.

In the effort-first trials, participants were shown a vertical bar representing the percentage of their maximum button pressing rate that would be required to do the task. They were then shown the size of the reward for performing the task. The reward-first trials presented the information in the opposite order.

After receiving both sets of information, participants were prompted to choose the no-effort option or the effort option.

The experimental design allowed the researchers to tease apart the effects of recent choices on the formation of value expectations of future decisions.

The results revealed a clear role for the vmPFC in encoding an expected reward before all information had been revealed. The data also suggested that the dACC and aI are involved in encoding the difference between what participants were expecting and what they actually got, rather than effort-cost encoding.

“Some have argued that decisions about effort have a different neural circuitry than decisions about probability and risk,” Treadway says. “We’ve showed that all three brain regions come into play, just in a different way than was previously known.”

Journal article:
http://www.pnas.org/content/115/22/E5233

Source:
http://esciencecommons.blogspot.com/2018/05/study-reveals-how-brain-decides-to-make.html

#prefrontalcortex #cingulatecortex #decisionmaking #neuroimaging #neuroscience
Photo
Shared publiclyView activity


    DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF INTELLIGENT? GET OVER IT!

         Do you consider yourself intelligent? If yes, how about explaining the concept of eternity?....... Not easy, is it?  I am a perpetual s...