Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Did Rudolf Giuliani violate the First Amendment?


Correction Appended


Photo

Mark Green, left, the former public advocate, with Rudolph Giuliani in December 2000. The two men often clashed, and in 1999, Mr. Giuliani attempted to rewrite the City Charter to prevent Mr. Green from succeeding him as mayor. CreditLibrado Romero/The New York Times

Rudolph W. Giuliani likens himself to a boxer who never takes a punch without swinging back. As mayor, he made the vengeful roundhouse an instrument of government, clipping anyone who crossed him.
In August 1997, James Schillaci, a rough-hewn chauffeur from the Bronx, dialed Mayor Giuliani’s radio program on WABC-AM to complain about a red-light sting run by the police near the Bronx Zoo. When the call yielded no results, Mr. Schillaci turned to The Daily News, which then ran a photo of the red light and this front page headline: “GOTCHA!”
That morning, police officers appeared on Mr. Schillaci’s doorstep. What are you going to do, Mr. Schillaci asked, arrest me? He was joking, but the officers were not.
They slapped on handcuffs and took him to court on a 13-year-old traffic warrant. A judge threw out the charge. A police spokeswoman later read Mr. Schillaci’s decades-old criminal rap sheet to a reporter for The Daily News, a move of questionable legality because the state restricts how such information is released. She said, falsely, that he had been convicted of sodomy.
Then Mr. Giuliani took up the cudgel.
“Mr. Schillaci was posing as an altruistic whistle-blower,” the mayor told reporters at the time. “Maybe he’s dishonest enough to lie about police officers.”
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Schillaci suffered an emotional breakdown, was briefly hospitalized and later received a $290,000 legal settlement from the city. “It really damaged me,” said Mr. Schillaci, now 60, massaging his face with thick hands. “I thought I was doing something good for once, my civic duty and all. Then he steps on me.”

Photo

Members of Housing Works, a nonprofit group that had challenged Mr. Giuliani’s AIDS policies, marching near City Hall in 1998. The police placed snipers atop City Hall during the march and monitored it by helicopter. CreditChester Higgins Jr./The New York Times

Mr. Giuliani was a pugilist in a city of political brawlers. But far more than his predecessors, historians and politicians say, his toughness edged toward ruthlessnessand became a defining aspect of his mayoralty. One result: New York City spent at least $7 million in settling civil rights lawsuits and paying retaliatory damages during the Giuliani years.
After AIDS activists with Housing Works loudly challenged the mayor, city officials sabotaged the group’s application for a federal housing grant. A caseworker who spoke of missteps in the death of a child was fired. After unidentified city workers complained of pressure to hand contracts to Giuliani-favored organizations, investigators examined not the charges but the identity of the leakers.
“There were constant loyalty tests: ‘Will you shoot your brother?’ ” said Marilyn Gelber, who served as environmental commissioner under Mr. Giuliani. “People were marked for destruction for disloyal jokes.”
Mr. Giuliani paid careful attention to the art of political payback. When former Mayors Edward I. Koch and David N. Dinkins spoke publicly of Mr. Giuliani’s foibles, mayoral aides removed their official portraits from the ceremonial Blue Room at City Hall. Mr. Koch, who wrote a book titled “Giuliani: Nasty Man,” shrugs.
“David Dinkins and I are lucky that Rudy didn’t cast our portraits onto a bonfire along with the First Amendment, which he enjoyed violating daily,” Mr. Koch said in a recent interview.
Mr. Giuliani retails his stories of childhood toughness, in standing up to bullies who mocked his love of opera and bridled at his Yankee loyalties. Years after leaving Manhattan College, he held a grudge against a man who beat him in a class election. He urged his commissioners to walk out of City Council hearings when questions turned hostile. But in his 2002 book “Leadership,” he said his instructions owed nothing to his temper.

Photo

James Schillaci, top, was arrested after he sought media attention about a police sting in the Bronx. He eventually called The Daily News, which put his complaint on the front page. “The mayor tarred me up,” he says.CreditTop, William C. Lopez for The New York Times; bottom, The Daily News

“It wasn’t my sensitivities I was worried about, but the tone of civility I strived to establish throughout the city,” he wrote. Mr. Giuliani declined requests to be interviewed for this article.
His admirers, not least former Deputy Mayor Randy M. Mastro, said it was unfair to characterize the mayor as vengeful, particularly given the “Herculean task” he faced when he entered office in 1994. Mr. Giuliani’s admirers claimed that the depredations of crack, AIDS, homicide and recession had brought the city to its knees, and that he faced a sclerotic liberal establishment. He wielded intimidation as his mace and wrested cost-savings and savings from powerful unions and politicians.
“The notion that the city needed broad-based change frightened a lot of entrenched groups,” said Fred Siegel, a historian and author of “The Prince of the City: Giuliani, New York and the Genius of American Life.” “He didn’t want to be politic with them.”
He cowed many into silence. Silence ensured the flow of city money.
Andy Humm, a gay activist, worked for the Hetrick-Martin Institute, which pushed condom giveaways in public schools. When Mr. Giuliani supported a parental opt-out, the institute’s director counseled silence to avoid losing city funds. “We were muzzled, and it was a disgrace,” Mr. Humm said.
Picking His Fights
Mr. Giuliani says he prefers to brawl with imposing opponents. His father, he wrote in “Leadership,” would “always emphasize: never pick on someone smaller than you. Never be a bully.”
As mayor, he picked fights with a notable lack of discrimination, challenging the city and state comptrollers, a few corporations and the odd council member. But the mayor’s fist also fell on the less powerful. In mid-May 1994, newspapers revealed that Mr. Giuliani’s youth commissioner, the Rev. John E. Brandon, suffered tax problems; more troubling revelations seemed in the offing.

Photo

EDWARD I. KOCHHis ceremonial portrait was removed from the Blue Room at City Hall.CreditSara Krulwich/The New York Times

At 7 p.m. on May 17, Mr. Giuliani’s press secretary dialed reporters and served up a hotter story: A former youth commissioner under Mr. Dinkins, Richard L. Murphy, had ladled millions of dollars to supporters of the former mayor. And someone had destroyed Department of Youth Services records and hard drives and stolen computers in an apparent effort to obscure what had happened to that money.
“My immediate goal is to get rid of the stealing, to get rid of the corruption,” Mr. Giuliani told The Daily News.
None of it was true. In 1995, the Department of Investigation found no politically motivated contracts and no theft by senior officials. But Mr. Murphy’s professional life was wrecked.
“I was soiled merchandise — the taint just lingers,” Mr. Murphy said in a recent interview.
Not long after, a major foundation recruited Mr. Murphy to work on the West Coast. The group wanted him to replicate his much-honored concept of opening schools at night as community centers. A senior Giuliani official called the foundation — a move a former mayoral official confirmed on the condition of anonymity for fear of embarrassing the organization — and the prospective job disappeared.
“He goes to people and makes them complicit in his revenge,” Mr. Murphy said.
This theme repeats. Two private employers in New York City, neither of which wanted to be identified because they feared retaliation should Mr. Giuliani be elected president, said the mayor’s office exerted pressure not to hire former Dinkins officials. When Mr. Giuliani battled schools Chancellor Ramon C. Cortines, he demanded that Mr. Cortines prove his loyalty by firing the press spokesman, John Beckman.
Mr. Beckman’s offense? He had worked in the Dinkins administration. “I found it,” Mr. Beckman said in an interview, “a really unfortunate example of how to govern.”

Photo

MARILYN GELBERThe former Giuliani official says people were “marked for destruction.”CreditRuby Washington/The New York Times

Joel Berger worked as a senior litigator in the city corporation counsel’s office until 1996. Afterward, he represented victims of police brutality and taught a class at the New York University School of Law, and his students served apprenticeships with the corporation counsel.
In late August 1997, Mr. Berger wrote a column in The New York Times criticizing Mr. Giuliani’s record on police brutality. A week later, a city official called the director of the N.Y.U. law school’s clinical programs and demanded that Mr. Berger be removed from the course. Otherwise, the official said, we will suspend the corporation counsel apprenticeship, according to Mr. Berger and an N.Y.U. official.
“It was ridiculously petty,” Mr. Berger said.
N.Y.U. declined to replace Mr. Berger and instead suspended the class after that semester.
‘Culture of Retaliation’
The Citizens Budget Commission has driven mayors of various ideological stripes to distraction since it was founded in 1932. The business-backed group bird-dogs the city’s fiscal management with an unsparing eye. But its analysts are fonts of creative thinking, and Mr. Giuliani asked Raymond Horton, the group’s president, to serve on his transition committee in 1993.
That comity was long gone by the autumn of 1997, when Mr. Giuliani faced re-election. Ruth Messinger, the mayor’s Democratic opponent, cited the commission’s work, and the mayor denounced the group, which had issued critical reports on welfare reform, police inefficiency and the city budget.
So far, so typical for mayors and their relationship with the commission. Mr. Koch once banned his officials from attending the group’s annual retreat. Another time, he attended and gave a speech excoriating the commission.

Photo

JOEL BERGER Ran afoul of Mr. Giuliani after representing victims of police brutality.CreditMichelle V. Agins/The New York Times

But one of Mr. Giuliani’s deputy mayors, Joseph Lhota, took an unprecedented step. He called major securities firms that underwrite city bonds and discouraged them from buying seats at the commission’s annual fund-raising dinner. Because Mr. Lhota played a key role in selecting the investment firms that underwrote the bonds, his calls raised an ethical tempest.
Apologizing struck Mr. Giuliani as silly.
“We are sending exactly the right message,” he said. “Their reports are pretty useless; they are a dilettante organization.”
Still, that dinner was a rousing success. “All mayors have thin skins, but Rudy has the thinnest skin of all,” Mr. Horton said.
Mr. Giuliani’s war with the nonprofit group Housing Works was more operatic. Housing Works runs nationally respected programs for the homeless, the mentally ill and people who are infected with H.I.V. But it weds that service to a 1960s straight-from-the-rice-paddies guerrilla ethos.
The group’s members marched on City Hall, staged sit-ins, and delighted in singling out city officials for opprobrium. Mr. Giuliani, who considered doing away with the Division of AIDS Services, became their favorite mayor in effigy.
Mr. Giuliani responded in kind. His police commanders stationed snipers atop City Hall and sent helicopters whirling overhead when 100 or so unarmed Housing Works protesters marched nearby in 1998. A year earlier, his officials systematically killed $6 million worth of contracts with the group, saying it had mismanaged funds.

Photo

RAYMOND HORTON President of the Citizens Budget Commission, which the mayor denounced.CreditLibrado Romero/The New York Times

Housing Works sued the city and discovered that officials had rescored a federal evaluation form to ensure that the group lost a grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Martin Oesterreich, the city’s homeless commissioner, denied wrongdoing but acknowledged that his job might have been forfeited if Housing Works had obtained that contract.
“That possibility could have happened,” Mr. Oesterreich told a federal judge.
The mayor’s fingerprints could not be found on every decision. But his enemies were widely known.
“The culture of retaliation was really quite remarkable,” said Matthew D. Brinckerhoff, the lawyer who represented Housing Works. “Up and down the food chain, everyone knew what this guy demanded.”
The Charter Fight
The mayor’s wartime style of governance reached an exhaustion point in the late 1990s. His poll numbers dipped, and the courts routinely ruled against the city, upholding the New York Civil Liberties Union in 23 of its 27 free-speech challenges during Mr. Giuliani’s mayoralty. After he left office, the city agreed to pay $327,000 to a black police officer who was fired because he had testified before the City Council about police brutality toward blacks. The city also agreed to rescind the firing of the caseworker who talked about a child’s death.
In 1999, Mr. Giuliani explored a run for the United States Senate. If he won that seat, he would leave the mayor’s office a year early. The City Charter dictated that Mark Green, the public advocate, would succeed him.

Photo

ANDY HUMM The gay activist says the Hetrick-Martin Institute was muzzled out of fear of losing financing for AIDS programs.CreditMichelle V. Agins/The New York Times

That prospect was intolerable to Mr. Giuliani. Few politicians crawled under the mayor’s skin as skillfully as Mr. Green. “Idiotic” and “inane” were some of the kinder words that Mr. Giuliani sent winging toward the public advocate, who delighted in verbally tweaking the mayor.
So Mr. Giuliani announced in June 1999 that a Charter Revision Commission, stocked with his loyalists, would explore changing the line of mayoral succession. Mr. Giuliani told The New York Times Magazine that he might not have initiated the charter review campaign if Mr. Green were not the public advocate. Three former mayors declared themselves appalled; Mr. Koch fired the loudest cannonade. “You ought to be ashamed of yourself, Mr. Mayor,” he said during a news conference.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz Jr., chairman of a Charter Revision Commission a decade earlier, wrote a letter to Mr. Giuliani warning that “targeting a particular person” would “smack of personal politics and predilections.
“All this is not worthy of you, or our city,” Mr. Schwarz wrote.
Mr. Mastro, who had left the administration, agreed to serve as the commission chairman. He eventually announced that a proposal requiring a special election within 60 days of a mayor’s early departure would not take effect until 2002, after both Mr. Giuliani and Mr. Green had left office. A civic group estimated that the commission spent more than a million dollars of taxpayer money on commercials before a citywide referendum on the proposal that was held in November 1999.
Voters defeated the measure, 76 percent to 24 percent. (In 2002, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg advocated a similar charter revision that passed with little controversy.)
Mr. Green had warned the mayor that rejection loomed.
“It was simple,” Mr. Green said. “It was the mayor vindictively going after an institutional critic for doing his job.”
None of this left the mayor chastened. In March 2000, an undercover officer killed Patrick Dorismond, a security guard, during a fight when the police mistook him for a drug dealer. The outcry infuriated the mayor, who released Mr. Dorismond’s juvenile record, a document that legally was supposed to remain sealed.
The victim, Mr. Giuliani opined, was no “altar boy.” Actually, he was. (Mr. Giuliani later expressed regret without precisely apologizing.)
James Schillaci, the Bronx whistle-blower, recalled reading those comments and shuddering at the memory. “The mayor tarred me up; you know what that feels like?” he said. “I still have nightmares.”
Correction: January 25, 2008 
A front-page article on Tuesday about Rudolph W. Giuliani’s tenure as mayor of New York referred incorrectly in a quotation to the former director of a gay advocacy organization, the Hetrick-Martin Institute, who was mentioned in an anecdote about Mr. Giuliani’s power to silence critics. The former director, who was not named in the article, is a woman, not a man. Also, a caption referred imprecisely to Andy Humm, a gay activist and former worker at Hetrick-Martin who supplied the anecdote. He said it was the agency that was muzzled out of fear of losing financing for AIDS programs; he did not say that he muzzled himself.

Continue reading the main story

SITE INDEXTHE NEW YORK TIMES

3 ARTICLES REMAINING

Monday, August 6, 2018

Sex, violence, and advertising traps!

 Sex is fun when it is shared by consenting adults. It is not so much fun when it is exploited on Television for the purpose of accumulating money. Companies use both violence and sex to sell products and the way they do that is interesting! They use fiction writers to create stories filled with violence and sexual innuendo for your interest and for your consumption. Then they hire advertising companies to contrast the violence with happy and smiling actors on Television commercials pretending to love cars and hair shampoo and almost every product you can imagine...also for your consumption. They don't call people "consumers" for nothing.
 Companies use sexual innuendo and actors with toothy and happy smiles to make them money...lots of money and they repeat the commercials often in a form of irritating hypnosis. It is the reason we are inundated by so many annoying commercials! They cut into our favorite programs, including news programs, almost every Two minutes hoping you will remember how their products will make you "happy" as opposed to the terrible violence they endorsed and helped to create on the "show".  Can irritating T.V. commercials stick in memory? I am Seventy Years old and I still remember a T.V. commercial from my adolescence. It went: "You'll wonder where the Yellow went when you brush your teeth with Pepsodent." To make my friends laugh I changed the words to: You'll wonder where the Yellow went, when you brush your teeth with Dynamite!

 Sexual pleasure is created by our hormones for the purpose of procreation. An evolutionary guarantee that our species will enjoy making a baby and in the process create a happy event for young couples. Most young women want a baby or two. Young men however,  not so much! Young women develop faster than men and young men generally want freedom from responsibility along with orgiastic pleasure. They seek out freedom loving young women who are willing to slow their biological clocks a few years in order to enjoy sex and freedom in much the same way they do. Women who are willing to use the pill and the condom to gain some basic freedom until the day they are ready and willing and able to have a baby. The major problem for young couples today is finding the work and the money to start a family!

  With housing prices sky high and computers and robots taking over much of the work, people are finding it difficult to make money let alone finding a responsible mate who will stick with them for a minimum of Twenty Years to help care and raise children to adulthood.

  If she is lucky a young woman will find a mate who will remain with her for life but today that is the exception and not the rule. All I can suggest is live in a small and cheap apartment and make only one baby, then grow vegetables in garden boxes everywhere. Plant fruit trees inside cities and invite tourists to pick the fruit. Why? Because tourists bring in money. Ride Bicycles and Electric vehicles to avoid global warming and stop using plastic products. Become a Vegan and stop killing helpless animals. You can also become a tourist yourself and enjoy nature or you can stay put and learn to make quality art objects. That is something Robots will not be able to do for a while. Create art. Have a great life and enjoy every moment because you are using up your energy and one day soon it will be gone.
Signed: Joseph Raglione
Executive director: The World Friendly Peace and Ecology Movement.
www.human4us2.blogspot
P.S. A tip of the hat goes out to the city of St. Eustache, Quebec, for their wonderful vegetable box behind the old church. A place where tourists can sit and eat small Cherry Red Tomatoes directly from the box.

Monday, July 30, 2018

MASS EXTINCTIONS FROM "'EARTH MATTERS"'.




6 things to know about Earth's 6th mass extinction

At least five similar die-offs have happened before, but this is the first in human history — and the first with human help.

RUSSELL MCLENDON
July 11, 2017, 10:18 a.m.
tuna
A new study suggests extinction is hitting large ocean dwellers, like tuna, harder than small marine life. (Photo: Ugo Montaldo/Shutterstock)
Earth has supported life for 3.5 billion years, but its hospitality is hardly consistent. Natural disasters have triggered at least five mass extinctions in the past 500 million years, each of which wiped out between 50 and 90 percent of all species on the planet. The most recent occurred about 65 million years ago, when an asteroid ended the reign of dinosaurs and opened new doors for mammals.
Now it's happening again. A 2015 study reported the long-suspected sixth mass extinction of Earth's wildlife is "already underway." And a 2017 study calls the loss of that wildlife a “biological annihilation” and a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilization.” Researchers from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México found the rate of population loss is extremely high — even among species that aren't considered endangered. They also found that up to half of all individual animals have been lost in the last few decades.
2016 study also suggests this sixth mass extinction is killing off large ocean dwellers (like sharks, whales, giant clams, sea turtles and tuna) in disproportionately greater numbers than smaller animals. That's a reversal from past extinctions, when there was a slight connection between smaller size and going extinct.
And while previous extinctions were often linked to asteroids or volcanoes, this one is an inside job. It's caused mainly by one species — a mammal, ironically. The current crisis is the handiwork of humans, and we have a "unique propensity to cull the largest members of a population," the authors of the 2016 study write.
Many scientists have been warning us for years, citing a pace of extinctions far beyond the historical "background" rate. Yet critics have argued that's based on inadequate data, preserving doubt about the scope of modern wildlife declines. To see if such doubt is justified, the 2015 study compared a conservatively low estimate of current extinctions with an estimated background rate twice as high as those used in previous studies. Despite the extra caution, it still found species are disappearing up to 114 times more quickly than they normally do in between mass extinctions.
Here are six important things to know about life in the sixth mass extinction:

1. This isn't normal.

Once abundant in the U.S., passenger pigeons were driven extinct by a surge of hunting and habitat loss.Once abundant in eastern North America, passenger pigeons were driven extinct by a surge of hunting and habitat loss. (Photo: Seabamirum/Flickr)
Extinction is a natural part of evolution, having already claimed an estimated 99 percent of all species in Earth's history. But things can get ugly when too many species die out too quickly, creating a domino effect capable of bringing down ecosystems. In the 2015 study mentioned above, researchers used a background rate of two mammal extinctions per 10,000 species per 100 years (2 E/MSY), which is double the background rate used in many previous studies. When they compared that to a conservative estimate of modern-day extinctions, they found no way to avoid calling this a mass extinction.
"Even under our assumptions, which would tend to minimize evidence of an incipient mass extinction, the average rate of vertebrate species loss over the last century is up to 114 times higher than the background rate," the study's authors write. "Under the 2 E/MSY background rate, the number of species that have gone extinct in the last century would have taken, depending on the vertebrate taxon, between 800 and 10,000 years to disappear. These estimates reveal an exceptionally rapid loss of biodiversity over the last few centuries, indicating that a sixth mass extinction is already under way."

2. Space is at a premium.

Aerial view of deforestation Deforestation is one of the primary threats for endangered species. (Photo: Fedorov Oleksiy/Shutterstock)
The No. 1 cause of modern wildlife declines is habitat loss and fragmentation, representing the primary threat for 85 percent of all species on the IUCN Red List. That includes deforestation for farming, logging and settlement, but also the less obvious threat of fragmentation by roads and other infrastructure.
And even where habitats aren't being razed or divided, they're increasingly altered by other human activities. Invasive species now threaten a variety of native plants and animals around the world, either by killing them directly or by outcompeting them for food and nest sites. Pollution is pervasive in many places, from chemicals like mercury that accumulate in fish to the plastic debris that slowly kills sea turtles, sea birds and cetaceans. Entire ecosystems are now migrating due to climate change, leaving behind less mobile or adaptable species. And in some parts of the world, poachers are obliterating rare species to meet demand for wildlife parts like rhino horn and elephant ivory.

3. Vertebrates are vanishing.

Lemur tree frogThe lemur tree frog is critically endangered and listed on the IUCN Red List. (Photo: G.J. Verspui/Shutterstock)
The number of vertebrate species that have definitely gone extinct since 1500 is at least 338, according to the 2015 study. (That doesn't include the less stringent categories of "extinct in the wild" (EW) and "possibly extinct" (PE), which push the total up to 617.) More than half of those extinctions have occurred since 1900 — 198 in the "extinct" (EX) category, plus another 279 in EW and PE.
Even under the most conservative estimates, the extinction rates for mammals, birds, amphibians and fish have all been at least 20 times their expected rates since 1900, the researchers note (the rate for reptiles ranges from 8 to 24 times above expected). Earth's entire vertebrate population has reportedly fallen 52 percent in the last 45 years alone, and the threat of extinction still looms for many — including an estimated 41 percent of all amphibian species and 26 percent of mammals.
"There are examples of species all over the world that are essentially the walking dead," Ehrlich says.

4. It's probably still worse than we think.

Insecticides can weaken native pollinators like bees, raising concerns about food supplies.Insecticides can weaken native pollinators like bees, raising concerns about food supplies. (Photo: Bjorn Watland/Flickr)
The 2015 study was intentionally conservative, so the actual rate of extinctions is almost certainly more extreme than it suggests. "We emphasize that our calculations very likely underestimate the severity of the extinction crisis," the researchers write, "because our aim was to place a realistic lower bound on humanity's impact on biodiversity."
The study also focuses on vertebrates, which are typically easier to count than smaller or subtler wildlife like mollusks, insects and plants. As another recent study pointed out, this leaves much of the crisis unexamined. "Mammals and birds provide the most robust data, because the status of almost all has been assessed," the authors of that study write. "Invertebrates constitute over 99 percent of species diversity, but the status of only a tiny fraction has been assessed, thereby dramatically underestimating overall levels of extinction."
By incorporating data on terrestrial invertebrates, they add, "this study estimates that we may already have lost 7 percent of [contemporary] species on Earth and that the biodiversity crisis is real."

5. No species is safe.

Fishing boatsAbout 1 billion people rely on fish as their main source of animal protein, according to the World Health Organization. (Photo: Albert Pego/Shutterstock)
Humans are hardly an endangered species, with a global population of about 7.2 billion and growing. But fortunes can change quickly, as we've demonstrated in recent decades with lots of other wildlife. And despite our best efforts to buffer ourselves against the whims of nature, civilization remains reliant on healthy ecosystems for food, water and other resources. Adjusting to mass extinctions would be a challenge under any circumstances, but it's especially daunting in the context of climate change.
"If it is allowed to continue, life would take many millions of years to recover, and our species itself would likely disappear early on," says Gerardo Ceballos of the Universidad Autónoma de México, lead author of the 2015 study. "We are sawing off the limb that we are sitting on," Ehrlich adds.

6. Unlike an asteroid, we can be reasoned with.

An artist's rendering of the asteroid widely credited with wiping out the dinosaurs.An artist's rendering of the asteroid widely credited with wiping out the dinosaurs. (Photo: NASA)
Previous mass extinctions may have been inevitable, but it's not too late to stop this one. While the authors of the 2015 study acknowledge the difficulty of curbing lucrative destruction like deforestation, not to mention climate change, they note it is still possible. It's even gaining momentum, thanks to growing public awareness as well as high-profile attention from governments, corporations and even the pope.
"Avoiding a true sixth mass extinction will require rapid, greatly intensified efforts to conserve already threatened species," the study's authors write, "and to alleviate pressures on their populations — notably habitat loss, over-exploitation for economic gain and climate change."
That won't be easy, but at least it's more of a chance than the dinosaurs got.
Editor's note: This story has been updated since it was originally published in June 2015.
    Russell McLendon (  @russmclendon ) writes about humans and other wildlife.

    DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF INTELLIGENT? GET OVER IT!

         Do you consider yourself intelligent? If yes, how about explaining the concept of eternity?....... Not easy, is it?  I am a perpetual s...