Tuesday, March 30, 2021














A provocative and fact 

based idea from Todd William.

Todd William

Shared publicly  -  Oct 12, 2015
 
The Value of Viewing Humanity with a Scientific Mindset

My seven year old son recently asked me what it means that all known life forms share a common ancestor.

It occurred to me how fascinating this revelation is, especially for those who have not read up on biology. So I decided to blow his mind.

”You know how our family tree works? Well if you were to go back far enough, you would find we are related to just about everyone.”

”But if you kept following the tree back,, say about 200 million years, you would find that you are actually related to the dog!


Science v Dogmatism

If you haven't studied biology, this is a pretty unexpected claim. My son’s initial reaction to this was some serious skepticism. So I explained that the scientific evidence is overwhelming, but also emphasized that he is under no obligation to  take my word for it.

Should he decide one day to take up biology and discover what it is about DNA and genetics that leads to this conclusion, he is welcome to make up his own mind. This is the beauty of science!

But this also brings up a point we should all heed: the core difference between science and dogmatism.

If you're putting up your hand and saying "ridiculous" at the first sign of anything you don't agree with - you're dogmatic. If you don't understand but are willing to learn why people think the way they do,  then you're scientific.


Ego

Whether one is willing to accept an evolutionary process as a possible explanation for the existence of consciousness is typically a matter of ego. For some it’s difficult to even consider the possibility that we're merely the lucky product of a complex process.

But dismissing this notion outright requires ignoring the findings of thousands upon thousands of biologists, anthropologists, genealogists, paleontologists, geologists, zoologists, botanists, embryologists, biochemists, and other fields of study that have compiled years of data that's been studied, tested, and examined from all over the world and the scientific spectrum.

Yet consciousness is viewed as the final frontier of human essence, that which makes us special. Thus there is a dogmatic trend to refuse to understand the scientific understanding of evolution.

This phenomena is not new. Consider the battle of mindsets that ensued when the idea of earth not being the center of the universe was put forth.

What is most important to remember is that personal preference has never had a role in truth. Nature is unconcerned with the human ego.


Being Special for the Right Reasons

Perhaps it’s time to consider that humans are not special for all the dogmatic ideals - but for more extraordinary reasons. There is a view that doesn’t require pretending to know the truth or ignoring any evidence.

The fact is, we can ponder these questions, share our ideas, and reflect on our feelings about them in spite of the possibility that our entire existence may merely be the result of a complex yet natural genetic process.

Now that is special.



For more intriguing ideas like this, visit:
www.the-thought-spot.com

Friday, March 26, 2021

A MESSAGE FROM A VERY GOOD MAN.

Fight With Compassion
"Sometimes friends ask me to help with some problem in the world, using some “magical powers.” I always tell them that the Dalai Lama has no magical powers. If I did, I would not feel pain in my legs or a sore throat. We are all the same as human beings, and we experience the same fears, the same hopes, the same uncertainties.
From the Buddhist perspective, every sentient being is acquainted with suffering and the truths of sickness, old age and death. But as human beings, we have the capacity to use our minds to conquer anger and panic and greed. In recent years I have been stressing “emotional disarmament”: to try to see things realistically and clearly, without the confusion of fear or rage. If a problem has a solution, we must work to find it; if it does not, we need not waste time thinking about it.
We Buddhists believe that the entire world is interdependent. That is why I often speak about universal responsibility. The outbreak of this terrible coronavirus has shown that what happens to one person can soon affect every other being. But it also reminds us that a compassionate or constructive act—whether working in hospitals or just observing social distancing—has the potential to help many.
Ever since news emerged about the coronavirus in Wuhan, I have been praying for my brothers and sisters in China and everywhere else. Now we can see that nobody is immune to this virus. We are all worried about loved ones and the future, of both the global economy and our own individual homes. But prayer is not enough.
This crisis shows that we must all take responsibility where we can. We must combine the courage doctors and nurses are showing with empirical science to begin to turn this situation around and protect our future from more such threats.
In this time of great fear, it is important that we think of the long-term challenges—and possibilities—of the entire globe. Photographs of our world from space clearly show that there are no real boundaries on our blue planet. Therefore, all of us must take care of it and work to prevent climate change and other destructive forces. This pandemic serves as a warning that only by coming together with a coordinated, global response will we meet the unprecedented magnitude of the challenges we face.
We must also remember that nobody is free of suffering, and extend our hands to others who lack homes, resources or family to protect them. This crisis shows us that we are not separate from one another—even when we are living apart. Therefore, we all have a responsibility to exercise compassion and help.
As a Buddhist, I believe in the principle of impermanence. Eventually, this virus will pass, as I have seen wars and other terrible threats pass in my lifetime, and we will have the opportunity to rebuild our global community as we have done many times before. I sincerely hope that everyone can stay safe and stay calm. At this time of uncertainty, it is important that we do not lose hope and confidence in the constructive efforts so many are making."

Sunday, March 14, 2021

 Hello Gentle People:

 Today, March 14, 2020, many people around the world are letting their guard down. They want to stop wearing protective masks and they believe a vaccine will protect them from SARS-CoV-2. 

  A few of those poor fools are even protesting, in the streets, the wearing of masks. Maybe they have not learned that the vaccines developed last year against Covid-19, may not work this year on the variants of Covid-19. They may not understand that a third wave of infection is around the corner because the damn disease continues to run rampant around the world. It is created by fools who do not wear masks or disinfect their hands when walking and talking in public. The disease continues to kill people today and will continue to kill people tomorrow until an all purpose vaccine is finally produced which will eradicate deadly viruses once and for all! Meanwhile, and until hospitals give us an all clear signal, wear your masks even if it takes another year.

  One more important point. Pollution is a breeding ground for viruses. The more you drive internal combustion engines and pump Carbon Monoxide into the air, the warmer becomes our climate and the  more viruses proliferate. If you are a callous and cold blooded polluter with no sense of moral or ethical integrity, at least allow your survival instinct to protect you from a deadly virus such as Sars-Cov-2s and death...temporarily.

N.J.R.

Sunday, March 7, 2021

Attention Greenpeace, Old-Growth trees in British Columbia need your help!

Photos Raise Alarm Over Old-Growth Logging in British Columbia

Photographer TJ Watt hopes his before-and-after images will spur people to action.

There are few sights as magnificent as an ancient tree. The towering cedars, firs, and spruces of Canada's Pacific Northwest can reach diameters of up to 20 feet as they grow over hundreds of years. Some are a thousand years old. They provide wildlife habitats, sustain immense biodiversity that's still being discovered, and store up to three times more carbon than younger forests. 

The old-growth forests of British Columbia remain the world's largest intact stand of temperate rainforest, but they are under threat from logging. Despite the provincial government's promises to protect old-growth forests, an area equivalent of 10,000 football fields is razed every year on Vancouver Island alone. This is a devastating loss that TJ Watt of the Ancient Forest Alliance tells Treehugger makes no sense whatsoever.

Watt is a photographer from Victoria, B.C., who has spent countless hours bushwhacking through forests and driving the logging roads of Vancouver Island to capture images that convey both the sheer grandeur of these trees and the unfortunate destruction they face. A recent series of before-and-after shots – depicting Watts standing next to massive trees that are later reduced to stumps – has captivated and alarmed viewers around the world. Indeed, it's what brought Watt to Treehugger's attention and started our conversation. 

There are few sights as heartbreaking as the death of an ancient tree. When asked why he thinks these pictures have resonated so deeply, Watt said, "It's not like it's a black-and-white photo from 1880. This is full color, 2021. You can't feign ignorance about what we're doing anymore. It's just wrong." He points out that it will be the year 3020 before we see anything like it again, and yet logging companies keep decimating them with the government's permission.

double headed cedar
A gorgeous pair of cedars destroyed. TJ Watt/Ancient Forest Alliance

Watt hunts for these endangered behemoth trees by using online mapping tools that show where there are pending or approved cutting operations and by spending time in the bush, looking for flagging tape. It's an ongoing challenge. "There's essentially no public information saying where five-year logging plans are, but we are essentially looking for the exact same thing [as the logging companies] – the biggest and best trees, those grand old growth forests – except that I'm looking with the goal of preserving them, and they're looking with the goal of cutting them."

Old-growth trees are desirable for their sheer size (logging companies get more wood for less work) and the tight growth rings that make for beautiful clear wood. But this ancient wood often ends up being used for purposes that wood from second-growth forests could do just as well, minus the environmental damage. 

"There are ways to manage second-growth forests to gain characteristics that old-growth forests have," Watt explained. To start, "let them grow longer. There are also new engineered wood products that mimic the quality and characteristics of old wood without having to use old wood. Pine can be pressure-treated to look like old-growth western red cedar." And so often wood gets painted over, which makes it pointless to use a beautiful clear grain in the first place.

The "race against time" theme comes up several times in the conversation with Watt. He expresses deep frustration with the B.C. government's failure to protect these forests. "All the latest science is saying we don't have time to spare. We need to enact immediate deferrals in most at-risk areas so that we don't lose most of these precious places." Delays should be avoided because the logging industry "sees the writing on the wall" and is racing to cut down the best logs as fast as it can. 

Ancient old-growth tree cut down
TJ Watt stands next to another ancient tree, tragically logged. TJ Watt/Ancient Forest Alliance

Watt laments how the government portrays logging, lumping productivity classes together. "It's true that there's a fair bit of old forest, but what's rare is productive forests with big trees." These are different from low-productivity old-growth forests, where the trees "look like little broccolis on the coast," stunted by exposure to wind or growing in inaccessible boggy or rocky places, and therefore not commercially valuable. Watt made a curious analogy:

"Combining the two is like mixing Monopoly money with regular money and claiming you're a millionaire. The government often uses this to say there's still more than enough old-growth forest to go around, or they talk about the percentage of what remains, but they're neglecting to address [the differences between productive and non-productive old-growth forests]."

A recent report called "BC's Old Growth Forests: A Last Stand for Biodiversity" found that only 3% of the province is suitable for growing big trees.1 Of that tiny sliver, 97.3% has been logged; only 2.7% remains untouched.1

Watt isn't opposed to logging. He realizes we need wood for all sorts of products, but it shouldn't come from endangered old-growth forests anymore. "We need to move to a more value-based industry, not volume-based. We can do more with what we cut and gain forestry jobs. Right now we're loading raw unprocessed logs onto barges and shipping them to China, Japan, and the US for processing, then buying them back. There could be more training and jobs programs created to mill that wood here. Mills here can be retooled to process second-growth wood." He wants to see the government supporting First Nations communities in the shift away from old-growth logging: 

"These remote communities have entered into agreements around old-growth logging and wouldn't necessarily have gone that way if it weren't the main economic incentive for them to provide revenue for communities. The government needs to have a solution and support Indigenous areas, help create new tribal parks, give them a fair choice to define their future – not make them choose between sacrificing jobs and revenues or protecting their forests."

He hopes his photography will inspire other citizens to take action, too. "Facts, figures and graphs don't have same impact. We need science and research behind these campaigns, but photos translate it into instant comprehension for people." Many people have reached out to Watt to say they've become environmental activists for the first time after seeing the before-and-after shots. 

"It is gut-wrenching to go back to these places I love," Watt said, "but photography allows me to convert that negative energy and anger into something constructive." He urges viewers to take five minutes to get in touch with politicians and let them know what's on their mind. "We hear from people in politics that the more noise we make, the more support it gives them on the inside to move this along. The B.C. Green Party gets ten times more emails on the issue of old-growth than any other topic in the province. It gives them ammunition when going up against the forestry minister." 

If you're unsure of what to say, the Ancient Forest Alliance has plenty of resources on its website, including talking points for calling politicians' offices. There's a petition asking the government to implement an Old-Growth Strategy that would address many of the issues Watt discusses.

He ends the conversation with a reminder of people's ability to make a difference. "All of our success comes from people's belief that they can effect change." Just because we're up against a multi-billion dollar industry with tons of lobbyists that want to keep the status quo in place doesn't mean we can't be successful. Really, when you think about it, we have no choice but to keep going. We must be the forest's voice.

Friday, March 5, 2021

GOD PROTECT ALL NON BELIEVERS

The Problem with Peer Group Pressure. 

 Education is not a weapon and neither is it a protection against peer group pressure. Peer group pressure is created by an authoritarian based society which could be: political, religious, economic or social and the pressure to conform is often imposed upon freedom loving and non-conformist individuals, by authorities dedicated to creating compliance and conformity. 

  The instinctive fear of isolation and the need for acceptance within a family or group, keeps most individuals obeying and following the "norms" of a family and of a society. Sometimes, however, rebels are created through neglect and isolation. They still have a need for social acceptance and love, but often, through neglect, are forced to find acceptance within other groups. This is how rebel groups are formed.

 It is ignorance and fear created by neglect which guide their social interactions. Fear of domination keeps them outside what is considered the normal parameters of a larger society and so, searching for social acceptance, they create their own small and sometimes dangerous societies.

 The deep and instinctive need for social acceptance is manipulated by peer group pressure. Even provided with years of fact-based education and alternative concepts, an individual is subject to peer group pressure and to the beliefs of the crowd. Individual capitulation is often the result. 

  The belief in a God or Gods is a good example. There is absolutely no logic in religion but religious beliefs continue to spread through word of mouth and propagated generation after generation from parents to children in spite of the creation of fact based educational systems. When standing in a large crowd of patriotic people, intelligent scientists will stand up and shout God save the Queen along with everybody else, even if he or she does not believe in the concept of a God.

 The crowd creates the peer group pressure simply by overwhelming numbers. And who could blame the scientist for joining the crowd? Shouting anything else in that context would immediately brand the contrarian as a heretic and he or she could be burned at the stake of public opinion. Real bonfires with victims tide to a stake occurred for centuries but today individuals with creative intelligence and imagination are slowly integrated into society, even if they refuse to believe in a God as an almighty creator of everything. 

 And so I end this little essay with the words...God save all non-believers, for they speak the truth! 

Confusing, isn't it? Grin!

N.J. R.

Monday, March 1, 2021

INTROUDCTION TO VIRUSES-WIKIPEDIA

SOON WE WILL BE IN A WORLD WITHOUT DANGEROUS VIRUSES BUT FOR NOW, HERE IS IMPORTANT NON- TECHNICAL  INFORMATION ABOUT VIRUSES... FROM WIKIPEDIA.



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia    HTTPS://EN.M.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/INTRO...

Jump to navigationJump to search

Illustration of a SARS-CoV-2 virion

virus is a tiny infectious agent that reproduces inside the cells of living hosts. When infected, the host cell is forced to rapidly produce thousands of identical copies of the original virus. Unlike most living things, viruses do not have cells that divide; new viruses assemble in the infected host cell. But unlike simpler infectious agents like prions, they contain genes, which allow them to mutate and evolve. Over 4,800 species of viruses have been described in detail[1] out of the millions in the environment. Their origin is unclear: some may have evolved from plasmids—pieces of DNA that can move between cells—while others may have evolved from bacteria.

Viruses are made of either two or three parts. All include genes. These genes contain the encoded biological information of the virus and are built from either DNA or RNA. All viruses are also covered with a protein coat to protect the genes. Some viruses may also have an envelope of fat-like substance that covers the protein coat, and makes them vulnerable to soap. A virus with this "viral envelope" uses it—along with specific receptors—to enter a new host cell. Viruses vary in shape from the simple helical and icosahedral to more complex structures. Viruses range in size from 20 to 300 nanometres; it would take 33,000 to 500,000 of them, side by side, to stretch to 1 centimetre (0.4 in).

Viruses spread in many ways. Although many are very specific about which host species or tissue they attack, each species of virus relies on a particular method to copy itself. Plant viruses are often spread from plant to plant by insects and other organisms, known as vectors. Some viruses of humans and other animals are spread by exposure to infected bodily fluids. Viruses such as influenza are spread through the air by droplets of moisture when people cough or sneeze. Viruses such as norovirusare transmitted by the faecal–oral route, which involves the contamination of hands, food and water. Rotavirus is often spread by direct contact with infected children. The human immunodeficiency virus, HIV, is transmitted by bodily fluids transferred during sex. Others, such as the dengue virus, are spread by blood-sucking insects.

Viruses, especially those made of RNA, can mutate rapidly to give rise to new types. Hosts may have little protection against such new forms. Influenza virus, for example, changes often, so a new vaccine is needed each year. Major changes can cause pandemics, as in the 2009 swine influenza that spread to most countries. Often, these mutations take place when the virus has first infected other animal hosts. Some examples of such "zoonotic" diseases include coronavirus in bats, and influenza in pigs and birds, before those viruses were transferred to humans.

Viral infections can cause disease in humans, animals and plants. In healthy humans and animals, infections are usually eliminated by the immune system, which can provide lifetime immunity to the host for that virus. Antibiotics, which work against bacteria, have no impact, but antiviral drugs can treat life-threatening infections. Those vaccines that produce lifelong immunity can prevent some infections.

Discovery[edit]

Scanning electron micrograph of HIV-1 viruses, coloured green, budding from a lymphocyte

In 1884, French microbiologist Charles Chamberland invented the Chamberland filter (or Chamberland–Pasteur filter), that contains pores smaller than bacteria. He could then pass a solution containing bacteria through the filter, and completely remove them. In the early 1890s, Russian biologist Dmitri Ivanovsky used this method to study what became known as the tobacco mosaic virus. His experiments showed that extracts from the crushed leaves of infected tobacco plants remain infectious after filtration.[2]

At the same time, several other scientists showed that, although these agents (later called viruses) were different from bacteria and about one hundred times smaller, they could still cause disease. In 1899, Dutch microbiologist Martinus Beijerinck observed that the agent only multiplied when in dividing cells. He called it a "contagious living fluid" (Latincontagium vivum fluidum)—or a "soluble living germ" because he could not find any germ-like particles.[3] In the early 20th century, English bacteriologist Frederick Twort discovered viruses that infect bacteria,[4] and French-Canadian microbiologist Félix d'Herelle described viruses that, when added to bacteria growing on agar, would lead to the formation of whole areas of dead bacteria. Counting these dead areas allowed him to calculate the number of viruses in the suspension.[5]

The invention of the electron microscope in 1931 brought the first images of viruses.[6] In 1935, American biochemist and virologist Wendell Meredith Stanley examined the tobacco mosaic virus and found it to be mainly made from protein.[7] A short time later, this virus was shown to be made from protein and RNA.[8] A problem for early scientists was that they did not know how to grow viruses without using live animals. The breakthrough came in 1931, when American pathologists Ernest William Goodpasture and Alice Miles Woodruff grew influenza, and several other viruses, in fertilised chickens' eggs.[9] Some viruses could not be grown in chickens' eggs. This problem was solved in 1949, when John Franklin EndersThomas Huckle Weller, and Frederick Chapman Robbins grew polio virus in cultures of living animal cells.[10] Over 4,800 species of viruses have been described in detail.[1]

Origins[edit]

Viruses co-exist with life wherever it occurs. They have probably existed since living cells first evolved. Their origin remains unclear because they do not fossilize, so molecular techniques have been the best way to hypothesise about how they arose. These techniques rely on the availability of ancient viral DNA or RNA, but most viruses that have been preserved and stored in laboratories are less than 90 years old.[11][12] Molecular methods have only been successful in tracing the ancestry of viruses that evolved in the 20th century.[13] New groups of viruses might have repeatedly emerged at all stages of the evolution of life.[14] There are three major theories about the origins of viruses:[14][15]

Regressive theory
Viruses may have once been small cells that parasitised larger cells. Eventually, the genes they no longer needed for a parasitic way of life were lost. The bacteria Rickettsia and Chlamydia are living cells that, like viruses, can reproduce only inside host cells. This lends credence to this theory, as their dependence on being parasites may have led to the loss of the genes that once allowed them to live on their own.[16]
Cellular origin theory
Some viruses may have evolved from bits of DNA or RNA that "escaped" from the genes of a larger organism. The escaped DNA could have come from plasmids—pieces of DNA that can move between cells—while others may have evolved from bacteria.[17]
Coevolution theory
Viruses may have evolved from complex molecules of protein and DNA at the same time as cells first appeared on earth, and would have depended on cellular life for many millions of years.[18]

There are problems with all of these theories. The regressive hypothesis does not explain why even the smallest of cellular parasites do not resemble viruses in any way. The escape or the cellular origin hypothesis does not explain the presence of unique structures in viruses that do not appear in cells. The coevolution, or "virus-first" hypothesis, conflicts with the definition of viruses, because viruses depend on host cells.[18][19] Also, viruses are recognised as ancient, and to have origins that pre-date the divergence of life into the three domains.[20] This discovery has led modern virologists to reconsider and re-evaluate these three classical hypotheses.[14][20]

Structure[edit]

Simplified diagram of the structure of a virus

A virus particle, also called a virion, consists of genes made from DNA or RNA which are surrounded by a protective coat of protein called a capsid.[21] The capsid is made of many smaller, identical protein molecules called capsomers. The arrangement of the capsomers can either be icosahedral (20-sided), helical, or more complex. There is an inner shell around the DNA or RNA called the nucleocapsid, made out of proteins. Some viruses are surrounded by a bubble of lipid (fat) called an envelope, which makes them vulnerable to soap and alcohol.[22]

Size[edit]

Viruses are among the smallest infectious agents, and are too small to be seen by light microscopy; most of them can only be seen by electron microscopy. Their sizes range from 20 to 300 nanometres; it would take 30,000 to 500,000 of them, side by side, to stretch to one centimetre (0.4 in).[21] In comparison, bacteria are typically around 1000 nanometres (1 micrometer) in diameter, and host cells of higher organisms are typically a few tens of micrometers. Some viruses such as megaviruses and pandoraviruses are relatively large viruses. At around 1000 nanometres, these viruses, which infect amoebae, were discovered in 2003 and 2013.[23][24] They are around ten times wider (and thus a thousand times larger in volume) than influenza viruses, and the discovery of these "giant" viruses astonished scientists.[25]

Genes[edit]

The genes of viruses are made from DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) and, in many viruses, RNA (ribonucleic acid). The biological information contained in an organism is encoded in its DNA or RNA. Most organisms use DNA, but many viruses have RNA as their genetic material. The DNA or RNA of viruses consists of either a single strand or a double helix.[26]

Viruses can reproduce rapidly because they have relatively few genes. For example, influenza virus has only eight genes and rotavirus has eleven. In comparison, humans have 20,000–25,000. Some viral genes contain the code to make the structural proteins that form the virus particle. Other genes make non-structural proteins found only in the cells the virus infects.[27][28]

All cells, and many viruses, produce proteins that are enzymes that drive chemical reactions. Some of these enzymes, called DNA polymerase and RNA polymerase, make new copies of DNA and RNA. A virus's polymerase enzymes are often much more efficient at making DNA and RNA than the equivalent enzymes of the host cells,[29] but viral RNA polymerase enzymes are error-prone, causing RNA viruses to mutate and form new strains.[30]

In some species of RNA virus, the genes are not on a continuous molecule of RNA, but are separated. The influenza virus, for example, has eight separate genes made of RNA. When two different strains of influenza virus infect the same cell, these genes can mix and produce new strains of the virus in a process called reassortment.[31]

Protein synthesis[edit]

Diagram of a typical eukaryotic cell, showing subcellular components. Organelles: (1) nucleolus (2) nucleus (3) ribosome (4) vesicle (5) rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (6) Golgi apparatus (7) cytoskeleton (8) smooth ER (9) mitochondria (10) vacuole (11) cytoplasm (12) lysosome (13) centrioleswithin centrosome (14) a virus shown to approximate scale

Proteins are essential to life. Cells produce new protein molecules from amino acid building blocks based on information coded in DNA. Each type of protein is a specialist that usually only performs one function, so if a cell needs to do something new, it must make a new protein. Viruses force the cell to make new proteins that the cell does not need, but are needed for the virus to reproduce. Protein synthesis consists of two major steps: transcription and translation.[32]

Transcription is the process where information in DNA, called the genetic code, is used to produce RNA copies called messenger RNA (mRNA). These migrate through the cell and carry the code to ribosomes where it is used to make proteins. This is called translation because the protein's amino acid structure is determined by the mRNA's code. Information is hence translated from the language of nucleic acids to the language of amino acids.[32]

Some nucleic acids of RNA viruses function directly as mRNA without further modification. For this reason, these viruses are called positive-sense RNA viruses.[33] In other RNA viruses, the RNA is a complementary copy of mRNA and these viruses rely on the cell's or their own enzyme to make mRNA. These are called negative-sense RNA viruses. In viruses made from DNA, the method of mRNA production is similar to that of the cell. The species of viruses called retroviruses behave completely differently: they have RNA, but inside the host cell a DNA copy of their RNA is made with the help of the enzyme reverse transcriptase. This DNA is then incorporated into the host's own DNA, and copied into mRNA by the cell's normal pathways.[34]

Life-cycle[edit]

Life-cycle of a typical virus (left to right); following infection of a cell by a single virus, hundreds of offspring are released.

When a virus infects a cell, the virus forces it to make thousands more viruses. It does this by making the cell copy the virus's DNA or RNA, making viral proteins, which all assemble to form new virus particles.[35]

There are six basic, overlapping stages in the life cycle of viruses in living cells:[36]

  • Attachment is the binding of the virus to specific molecules on the surface of the cell. This specificity restricts the virus to a very limited type of cell. For example, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infects only human T cells, because its surface protein, gp120, can only react with CD4 and other molecules on the T cell's surface. Plant viruses can only attach to plant cells and cannot infect animals. This mechanism has evolved to favour those viruses that only infect cells in which they are capable of reproducing.
  • Penetration follows attachment; viruses penetrate the host cell by endocytosis or by fusion with the cell.
  • Uncoating happens inside the cell when the viral capsid is removed and destroyed by viral enzymes or host enzymes, thereby exposing the viral nucleic acid.
  • Replication of virus particles is the stage where a cell uses viral messenger RNA in its protein synthesis systems to produce viral proteins. The RNA or DNA synthesis abilities of the cell produce the virus's DNA or RNA.
  • Assembly takes place in the cell when the newly created viral proteins and nucleic acid combine to form hundreds of new virus particles.
  • Release occurs when the new viruses escape or are released from the cell. Most viruses achieve this by making the cells burst, a process called lysis. Other viruses such as HIV are released more gently by a process called budding.

Effects on the host cell[edit]

Viruses have an extensive range of structural and biochemical effects on the host cell.[37] These are called cytopathic effects.[38] Most virus infections eventually result in the death of the host cell. The causes of death include cell lysis (bursting), alterations to the cell's surface membrane and apoptosis (cell "suicide").[39] Often cell death is caused by cessation of its normal activity due to proteins produced by the virus, not all of which are components of the virus particle.[40]

Some viruses cause no apparent changes to the infected cell. Cells in which the virus is latent (inactive) show few signs of infection and often function normally.[41] This causes persistent infections and the virus is often dormant for many months or years. This is often the case with herpes viruses.[42][43]

Some viruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus, often cause cells to proliferate without causing malignancy;[44] but some other viruses, such as papillomavirus, are an established cause of cancer.[45] When a cell's DNA is damaged by a virus such that the cell cannot repair itself, this often triggers apoptosis. One of the results of apoptosis is destruction of the damaged DNA by the cell itself. Some viruses have mechanisms to limit apoptosis so that the host cell does not die before progeny viruses have been produced; HIV, for example, does this.[46]

Viruses and diseases[edit]

There are many ways in which viruses spread from host to host but each species of virus uses only one or two. Many viruses that infect plants are carried by organisms; such organisms are called vectors. Some viruses that infect animals, including humans, are also spread by vectors, usually blood-sucking insects, but direct transmission is more common. Some virus infections, such as norovirus and rotavirus, are spread by contaminated food and water, by hands and communal objects, and by intimate contact with another infected person, while others are airborne (influenza virus). Viruses such as HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C are often transmitted by unprotected sex or contaminated hypodermic needles. To prevent infections and epidemics, it is important to know how each different kind of virus is spread.[47]

In humans[edit]

Common human diseases caused by viruses include the common coldinfluenzachickenpox and cold sores. Serious diseases such as Ebola and AIDS are also caused by viruses.[48] Many viruses cause little or no disease and are said to be "benign". The more harmful viruses are described as virulent.[49] Viruses cause different diseases depending on the types of cell that they infect. Some viruses can cause lifelong or chronic infections where the viruses continue to reproduce in the body despite the host's defence mechanisms.[50] This is common in hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections. People chronically infected with a virus are known as carriers. They serve as important reservoirs of the virus.[51][52]

Endemic[edit]

If the proportion of carriers in a given population reaches a given threshold, a disease is said to be endemic.[53] Before the advent of vaccination, infections with viruses were common and outbreaks occurred regularly. In countries with a temperate climate, viral diseases are usually seasonal. Poliomyelitis, caused by poliovirus often occurred in the summer months.[54] By contrast colds, influenza and rotavirus infections are usually a problem during the winter months.[55][56] Other viruses, such as measles virus, caused outbreaks regularly every third year.[57] In developing countries, viruses that cause respiratory and enteric infections are common throughout the year. Viruses carried by insects are a common cause of diseases in these settings. Zika and dengue viruses for example are transmitted by the female Aedes mosquitoes, which bite humans particularly during the mosquitoes' breeding season.[58]

Pandemic and emergent[edit]

Left to right: the African green monkey, source of SIV; the sooty mangabey, source of HIV-2; and the chimpanzee, source of HIV-1
Origin and evolution of (A) SARS-CoV (B) MERS-CoV, and (C) SARS-CoV-2 in different hosts. All the viruses came from bats as coronavirus-related viruses before mutating and adapting to intermediate hosts and then to humans and causing the diseases SARSMERSand COVID-19.(Adapted from Ashour et al. (2020) [59])

Although viral pandemics are rare events, HIV—which evolved from viruses found in monkeys and chimpanzees—has been pandemic since at least the 1980s.[60] During the 20th century there were four pandemics caused by influenza virus and those that occurred in 1918, 1957 and 1968 were severe.[61] Before its eradication, smallpox was a cause of pandemics for more than 3,000 years.[62] Throughout history, human migration has aided the spread of pandemic infections; first by sea and in modern times also by air.[63]

With the exception of smallpox, most pandemics are caused by newly evolved viruses. These "emergent" viruses are usually mutants of less harmful viruses that have circulated previously either in humans or in other animals.[64]

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) are caused by new types of coronaviruses. Other coronaviruses are known to cause mild infections in humans,[65] so the virulence and rapid spread of SARS infections—that by July 2003 had caused around 8,000 cases and 800 deaths—was unexpected and most countries were not prepared.[66]

A related coronavirus emerged in Wuhan, China in November 2019 and spread rapidly around the world. Thought to have originated in bats and subsequently named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, infections with the virus cause a disease called COVID-19, that varies in severity from mild to deadly,[67] and led to a pandemic in 2020.[59][68][69] Restrictions unprecedented in peacetime have been placed on international travel,[70]and curfews imposed in several major cities worldwide.[71]

In plants[edit]

Peppers infected by mild mottle virus

There are many types of plant virus, but often they only cause a decrease in yield, and it is not economically viable to try to control them. Plant viruses are frequently spread from plant to plant by organisms called "vectors". These are normally insects, but some funginematode worms and single-celled organisms have also been shown to be vectors. When control of plant virus infections is considered economical (perennial fruits, for example) efforts are concentrated on killing the vectors and removing alternate hosts such as weeds.[72] Plant viruses are harmless to humans and other animals because they can only reproduce in living plant cells.[73]

Bacteriophages[edit]

The structure of a typical bacteriophage

Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and archaea.[74] They are important in marine ecology: as the infected bacteria burst, carbon compounds are released back into the environment, which stimulates fresh organic growth. Bacteriophages are useful in scientific research because they are harmless to humans and can be studied easily. These viruses can be a problem in industries that produce food and drugs by fermentation and depend on healthy bacteria. Some bacterial infections are becoming difficult to control with antibiotics, so there is a growing interest in the use of bacteriophages to treat infections in humans.[75]

Host resistance[edit]

Innate immunity of animals[edit]

Animals, including humans, have many natural defences against viruses. Some are non-specific and protect against many viruses regardless of the type. This innate immunity is not improved by repeated exposure to viruses and does not retain a "memory" of the infection. The skin of animals, particularly its surface, which is made from dead cells, prevents many types of viruses from infecting the host. The acidity of the contents of the stomach destroys many viruses that have been swallowed. When a virus overcomes these barriers and enters the host, other innate defences prevent the spread of infection in the body. A special hormone called interferon is produced by the body when viruses are present, and this stops the viruses from reproducing by killing the infected cells and their close neighbours. Inside cells, there are enzymes that destroy the RNA of viruses. This is called RNA interference. Some blood cells engulf and destroy other virus-infected cells.[76]

Adaptive immunity of animals[edit]

Two rotavirus particles: the one on the right is coated with antibodies which stop its attaching to cells and infecting them

Specific immunity to viruses develops over time and white blood cells called lymphocytes play a central role. Lymphocytes retain a "memory" of virus infections and produce many special molecules called antibodies. These antibodies attach to viruses and stop the virus from infecting cells. Antibodies are highly selective and attack only one type of virus. The body makes many different antibodies, especially during the initial infection. After the infection subsides, some antibodies remain and continue to be produced, usually giving the host lifelong immunity to the virus.[77]

Plant resistance[edit]

Plants have elaborate and effective defence mechanisms against viruses. One of the most effective is the presence of so-called resistance (R) genes. Each R gene confers resistance to a particular virus by triggering localised areas of cell death around the infected cell, which can often be seen with the unaided eye as large spots. This stops the infection from spreading.[78] RNA interference is also an effective defence in plants.[79] When they are infected, plants often produce natural disinfectants that destroy viruses, such as salicylic acidnitric oxide and reactive oxygen molecules.[80]

Resistance to bacteriophages[edit]

The major way bacteria defend themselves from bacteriophages is by producing enzymes which destroy foreign DNA. These enzymes, called restriction endonucleases, cut up the viral DNA that bacteriophages inject into bacterial cells.[81]

Prevention and treatment of viral disease[edit]

Vaccines[edit]

The structure of DNA showing the position of the nucleosides and the phosphorus atoms that form the "backbone" of the molecule

Vaccines simulate a natural infection and its associated immune response, but do not cause the disease. Their use has resulted in the eradication of smallpox and a dramatic decline in illness and death caused by infections such as poliomeaslesmumps and rubella.[82] Vaccines are available to prevent over fourteen viral infections of humans[83] and more are used to prevent viral infections of animals.[84] Vaccines may consist of either live or killed viruses.[85] Live vaccines contain weakened forms of the virus, but these vaccines can be dangerous when given to people with weak immunity. In these people, the weakened virus can cause the original disease.[86]Biotechnology and genetic engineering techniques are used to produce "designer" vaccines that only have the capsid proteins of the virus. Hepatitis B vaccine is an example of this type of vaccine.[87] These vaccines are safer because they can never cause the disease.[85]

Antiviral drugs[edit]

The structure of the DNA base guanosine and the antiviral drug aciclovir which functions by mimicking it

Since the mid-1980s, the development of antiviral drugs has increased rapidly, mainly driven by the AIDS pandemic. Antiviral drugs are often nucleoside analogues, which masquerade as DNA building blocks (nucleosides). When the replication of virus DNA begins, some of the fake building blocks are used. This prevents DNA replication because the drugs lack the essential features that allow the formation of a DNA chain. When DNA production stops the virus can no longer reproduce.[88] Examples of nucleoside analogues are aciclovir for herpes virus infections and lamivudine for HIV and hepatitis B virus infections. Aciclovir is one of the oldest and most frequently prescribed antiviral drugs.[89]

Other antiviral drugs target different stages of the viral life cycle. HIV is dependent on an enzyme called the HIV-1 protease for the virus to become infectious. There is a class of drugs called protease inhibitors, which bind to this enzyme and stop it from functioning.[90]

Hepatitis C is caused by an RNA virus. In 80% of those infected, the disease becomes chronic, and they remain infectious for the rest of their lives unless they are treated. There is an effective treatment that uses the nucleoside analogue drug ribavirin.[91] Treatments for chronic carriers of the hepatitis B virus have been developed by a similar strategy, using lamivudine and other anti-viral drugs. In both diseases, the drugs stop the virus from reproducing and the interferon kills any remaining infected cells.[92]

HIV infections are usually treated with a combination of antiviral drugs, each targeting a different stage in the virus's life-cycle. There are drugs that prevent the virus from attaching to cells, others that are nucleoside analogues and some poison the virus's enzymes that it needs to reproduce. The success of these drugs is proof of the importance of knowing how viruses reproduce.[90]

Role in ecology[edit]

Viruses are the most abundant biological entity in aquatic environments;[93] one teaspoon of seawater contains about ten million viruses,[94] and they are essential to the regulation of saltwater and freshwater ecosystems.[95] Most are bacteriophages,[96] which are harmless to plants and animals. They infect and destroy the bacteria in aquatic microbial communities and this is the most important mechanism of recycling carbon in the marine environment. The organic molecules released from the bacterial cells by the viruses stimulate fresh bacterial and algal growth.[97]

Microorganisms constitute more than 90% of the biomass in the sea. It is estimated that viruses kill approximately 20% of this biomass each day and that there are fifteen times as many viruses in the oceans as there are bacteria and archaea. They are mainly responsible for the rapid destruction of harmful algal blooms,[98] which often kill other marine life.[99] The number of viruses in the oceans decreases further offshore and deeper into the water, where there are fewer host organisms.[100]

Their effects are far-reaching; by increasing the amount of respiration in the oceans, viruses are indirectly responsible for reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by approximately 3 gigatonnesof carbon per year.[100]

Marine mammals are also susceptible to viral infections. In 1988 and 2002, thousands of harbour seals were killed in Europe by phocine distemper virus.[101] Many other viruses, including caliciviruses, herpesviruses, adenoviruses and parvoviruses, circulate in marine mammal populations.[100

DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF INTELLIGENT? GET OVER IT!

     Do you consider yourself intelligent? If yes, how about explaining the concept of eternity?....... Not easy, is it?  I am a perpetual s...