Tuesday, December 29, 2020

Attention all physicists...HELP!



E=MC2

E=mc2.  Einstein’s equation explains how mass and energy are two forms of the same thing. Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared or simply when mass is accelerated to the speed of light squared, it becomes pure energy and (correct me if I am wrong) once that energy begins to slow down in the freezing cold of space, it again contracts  into a mass. When energy freezes it compresses into a mass and it is attracted by gravitational pull to even larger masses of compressed energy, to then join with the larger energy mass.

   A Mass is therefore compressed energy and energy is mass travelling at the speed of light squared which means that our atoms are pure energy travelling at the speed of light squared.  

   I enjoy Einstein’s equation because it is a brain teaser. I can play with it. For example, what if I removed the C2 or speed of light squared from the equation? What is left? Is it super dense mass without energy? No, because according to Einstein’s equation, E=MC2, accelerated mass is equal to pure energy and pure energy is equal to mass. We just have to understand how that occurs? ( I am guessing that the speed of energy changes to create different forms of mass.  J.N.R. )   I understand that mass equals energy but how does it work? Does mass contain condensed energy moving at the speed of light? I presume Einstein is correct and therefore the question remains how does compressed energy...or a Mass of energy...transform itself to again become uncompressed pure energy? What force pushes Mass so fast it converts to pure energy?  At that speed what is it? Is it super non-cohesive energy? Does mass, which is energy, exist without the speed of light squared? Is the speed of light squared absolutely necessary to create energy? Apparently there exists within my universe an infinite mass of questions.  E=MC2 ?  J.N.R.

Saturday, December 26, 2020


             HAPPY NEW YEAR, WORLD!

             MAY YOU ALL BE VACCINATED

                               TWICE!

Monday, December 21, 2020


 

                                            BARACK OBAMA AND FRIEND.
                                    HAPPY HOLIDAYS!

Friday, December 18, 2020




Happy holidays to all you wonderful Blogspot and Google creators. Thank You for your friendly generosity which has allowed me to create an international social media free press network.

Joseph Nelson Raglione. Executive Director:   

The World Friendly Peace and Ecology Movement.

Sunday, December 13, 2020

VERTICAL FARMING TAKES ROOT.


Europe’s Biggest Vertical Farm Will Be Powered by Wind 

and Planted by Robots

138

From cultured meat to plant-based foods to robotic kitchen assistants, tech seems to be infiltrating every corner of our food system. And it’s a good thing, because we’re sorely in need of ways to make more and better-quality food using fewer resources.

One rapidly-spreading technology that’s doing just that is vertical farming, which uses LED lights and a heavily-controlled indoor environment to grow produce with dramatically less water, space, or fertilizer than in traditional agriculture.

There are vertical farms all over the world, from Singapore to the UK to the US. And this week, the first phase of construction was completed on what will be a major addition to the industry.

The new facility is in Denmark, in an area called Taastrup outside of Copenhagen. At 7,000 square meters (just over 73,000 square feet), it will be the biggest vertical farm in Europe. Crops will grow in stacks 14 layers high and will use more than 20,000 LED lights.

The farm’s technology comes from a Taiwanese vertical farming company called YesHealth Group, which partnered with Danish food tech company Nordic Harvest for this project.

Beyond the abundance of layers and lights, it takes automation to the next level; little robots on wheels will be tasked with delivering seeds to the various rows of stacked growing shelves. Sensors combined with smart software will monitor and process more than 5,000 different data points; a key one, for example, is the intensity of the LED light as it relates to the stage of growth the plant is in.

Amid all this, greens will reportedly be grown using just one liter of water per kilogram of produce, which is a whopping 250 times less than what’s used in traditional agriculture. Rather than needing to be watered, the plants actually sit in grow trays with their roots extending into shallow troughs of nutrient-rich water. And all that light from the LEDs? It’ll come from electricity generated by wind; almost half of Denmark’s total power is sourced from wind, and the farm’s creators felt that using this sustainable source of energy was the optimal choice.

As Nordic Harvest’s website points out, consumers in the West are spoiled. We’ve gotten used to being able to buy and eat whatever fruits and vegetables we desire at any time of year. Blueberries in February? Sure! Oranges in July? Why not! Produce that’s out of season costs us a little more at our local grocery store, and it’s probably flown or shipped in from thousands of miles away, but hey—sometimes you just want to make a cherry pie from scratch in the middle of winter.

The supply chain to get these fresh foods from point A to point B is no small endeavor, though. From keeping fruits or veggies cold and pest-free for the journey to making sure they arrive unblemished to using chemicals to keep them fresher for longer, this system puts a lot of strain on both the environment and on the foods themselves.

Vertical farms will change this. Sure, they may not be able to grow everything under the sun—for now they’re mostly limited to greens like lettuce, spinach, kale, etc.—but they can grow the same quantity and quality of crops year-round, and they’ll redefine the meaning of “eating local.” If enough of them pop up, they could even help allow some farmland to be reforested.

According to Nordic Harvest’s website, if it established more sites like Taastrup and grew greens in a space equaling the size of 20 soccer fields, this would allow Denmark to become “self-sufficient in salads and herbs” rather than importing them from other countries; currently only 30 percent of Denmark’s consumption of these items is grown domestically.

Not only will Taastrup grow produce locally, it will grow it quickly. The facility plans to harvest the layered greens 15 times a year, for an output totaling 1,000 metric tons annually. “In this kind of growing method…you won’t be influenced by the climate, so you can [grow on] a new schedule,” said Stella Tsai, YesHealth Group’s general manager.

The facility plans to start producing in the first quarter of next year, and expects to be profitable next year too, reaching its full 1,000-ton capacity by the end of 2021.

Image Credit: Nordic Harvest

Vanessa is senior editor of Singularity Hub. She's interested in renewable energy, health and medicine, international development, and countless other topics. When she's not reading or writing you can usually find her outdoors, in water, or on a plane.

FOLLOW VANESSA:

  

Saturday, December 12, 2020

A NEW YEAR MESSAGE FOR CANADA'S PRIME MINISTER: JUSTIN TRUDEAU.

Dear Prime Minister:

When a few dozen Mexican farm workers finally decide to avoid being exploited and they walk away from the farm fields of Canada, thousands of hungry college and university trained Canadian bureaucrats will wonder what went wrong with the economic system. They may also wonder how to grow vegetables in office buildings and yes, it is possible for them to learn how to grow vegetables in office buildings using hydroponic gardening methods.

 Today, millions of bureaucrats certainly don't know how or where to grow and harvest vegetables. In school they received psychology training and computer training and in 2020, the private multi-million dollar sky scraper office buildings they inhabit during daylight hours, lock them out because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Office buildings always lock their doors at night to stop itinerants from moving in, even in the devastating cold of winter! They keep the lights on to give the world a good impression of their corporate power. Generosity and compassion are seldom provided for the poor and homeless by large multi-national corporations. Economic power, yes, compassion, no! In our so called Christian society, this is criminal! Millions of square feet of space are not being used and office workers with high intelligence are not valued. They work for large multi-national very exploitive companies with CEO's who will do anything to maintain the status quo...and that includes lobbying the Federal government for money and tax breaks and attempting to block fact based news and social networks from exposing the truth.

 Some farmers in Quebec plowed under their crops because not enough Mexican workers were available to help them harvest the vegetables. What in hell is going on? Are Canadian students and welfare recipients and yes, even office workers, not provided with opportunities to work on the land or in sky scrapers filled with plants grown hydroponically? We are years behind Holland and much too dependant on Oil and polluting industries presently dominating our lives.

---------------------------------------------------------

The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has shown what Canada can do when we treat a crisis like a crisis. We have thrown out the old rulebook of what is politically possible and focused on what is politically necessary to protect ourselves and our loved ones. 

I want to thank you for your work in these difficult times, but also to tell you that I don’t want us to go back to a ‘normal’ or a system which creates rampant inequalities based on a model of infinite exploitation and destruction of nature.

 Now that the time has come to rebuild our future — and we will — we need to have courage and foresight to create something better. The recovery from COVID-19 must make our society more resilient, fair and sustainable. 

 People in Canada deserve a world that values cooperation and caring and a government that embeds these values in our public policies. That respects nature and lives within its limits. A Canada where Indigenous rights and wisdom are not just a slogan, but protected by law. A world that recognizes that solutions to climate change can create great jobs and a better future.  

 A green recovery for Canada means investing in: Trees and gardens and Green-Houses for every citizen in proportion to the territory they own or inhabit.

 A much faster and just transition to a sustainable low-carbon economy if climate change does not destroy us first with viral pandemics and floods and forest fires!

 The protection and restoration of land, freshwater, and ocean ecosystems along with the wildlife that call these places home is now next to impossible today, in the year 2020, with our present human population growth. Sex education in the schools must become a priority and the school buildings themselves must be transformed into large round Sunlit Green Houses with computers and quiet rooms to study Botany and Biology and Science.

 The current land development companies creating: office towers, condos, apartment buildings and industrial parks everywhere there is an inch of space must be shut down and reimagined. They have become dangerous exploiters and are potentially creating future overcrowded slums! Developers are buying up every piece of farm land and small Green space they could find available in Canada and especially in Quebec, which considers itself an independent country. These money hungry developers are backed by our tax hungry municipal governments and the over-crowding they are creating will be unsustainable for Canadian tax payers and our federal government in the near future, if there is a future as global warming continues to heat up the planet and continues to change the atmosphere. 

 A few years ago in countries such as Syria, drought forced people to move into the cities and then over-crowding and poverty and misery created civil disobedience which lead to...war and genocide! One technical solution which is possible is to re-imagine towns and villages and place them underground, almost exactly like the present Montreal underground network of tunnels and boutiques except with sleeping quarters for a large majority of the population. I suggest we tunnel deep and create comfortable and bright housing apartments under the few remaining Green spaces left in Canada and we use fibre optic cables to bring sunlight down to the people. Above ground we can maintain parks filled with flowers and trees and Green-Houses open to everyone. 

 We can also convert under-used industrial parks into apartment buildings and wrap the buildings in Greenery. Literally create buildings with thousands of plants growing on the roof tops and inside and outside the buildings. Europe is ahead of us in this respect. 

We need an end to the use of single-use plastics, and the growth of a circular economy. Money is not edible! 

We must stop or replace the dangerous chemicals used in both agriculture and in the creation of consumer goods, and we need cleaner and safer manufacturing alternatives. The Elon Musk Giga-factory is an example of a clean manufacturing plant creating a useful alternative to fossil fuels. 

The development of accessible and affordable and healthy communities and transportation networks is vital for a safe future!  One good example is the Electric commuter busses presently used in the city of Moscow in Russia. Many other examples can be found around the world but not in Canada! Why in hell not! Is it because we are allowing big Oil to influence our decisions?

We need a future that prioritizes well-being and social and racial justice with economic equity for all people living in Canada...and around the world, created in partnership with Indigenous Peoples and the communities most exposed to environmental harm. The Amazon rain forest is a sad example.

I urge you to speak out in favour of a green and just recovery with your fellow Parliamentarians and the media and I look forward to working with you and our community to build this better world. Thanks for reading

Sincerely,

SIGNED: JOSEPH NELSON RAGLIONE.

The World Friendly Peace and Ecology Movement in partnership with Green-Peace and the Indigenous People of Canada.

http://www. human4us2.com

Friday, December 11, 2020

Last year the climate produced a deadly virus. This year?!

World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency

BioScience, Volume 70, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages 8–12, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
Published:
 
05 November 2019

Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” On the basis of this obligation and the graphical indicators presented below, we declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency.

Exactly 40 years ago, scientists from 50 nations met at the First World Climate Conference (in Geneva 1979) and agreed that alarming trends for climate change made it urgently necessary to act. Since then, similar alarms have been made through the 1992 Rio Summit, the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, and the 2015 Paris Agreement, as well as scores of other global assemblies and scientists’ explicit warnings of insufficient progress (Ripple et al. 2017). Yet greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are still rapidly rising, with increasingly damaging effects on the Earth's climate. An immense increase of scale in endeavors to conserve our biosphere is needed to avoid untold suffering due to the climate crisis (IPCC 2018).

Most public discussions on climate change are based on global surface temperature only, an inadequate measure to capture the breadth of human activities and the real dangers stemming from a warming planet (Briggs et al. 2015). Policymakers and the public now urgently need access to a set of indicators that convey the effects of human activities on GHG emissions and the consequent impacts on climate, our environment, and society. Building on prior work (see supplemental file S2), we present a suite of graphical vital signs of climate change over the last 40 years for human activities that can affect GHG emissions and change the climate (figure 1), as well as actual climatic impacts (figure 2). We use only relevant data sets that are clear, understandable, systematically collected for at least the last 5 years, and updated at least annually.

Figure 1.

Change in global human activities from 1979 to the present. These indicators are linked at least in part to climate change. In panel (f), annual tree cover loss may be for any reason (e.g., wildfire, harvest within tree plantations, or conversion of forests to agricultural land). Forest gain is not involved in the calculation of tree cover loss. In panel (h), hydroelectricity and nuclear energy are shown in figure S2. The rates shown in panels are the percentage changes per decade across the entire range of the time series. The annual data are shown using gray points. The black lines are local regression smooth trend lines. Abbreviation: Gt oe per year, gigatonnes of oil equivalent per year. Sources and additional details about each variable are provided in supplemental file S2, including table S2.

Figure 2.

Climatic response time series from 1979 to the present. The rates shown in the panels are the decadal change rates for the entire ranges of the time series. These rates are in percentage terms, except for the interval variables (d, f, g, h, i, k), where additive changes are reported instead. For ocean acidity (pH), the percentage rate is based on the change in hydrogen ion activity, aH+ (where lower pH values represent greater acidity). The annual data are shown using gray points. The black lines are local regression smooth trend lines. Sources and additional details about each variable are provided in supplemental file S2, including table S3.

The climate crisis is closely linked to excessive consumption of the wealthy lifestyle. The most affluent countries are mainly responsible for the historical GHG emissions and generally have the greatest per capita emissions (table S1). In the present article, we show general patterns, mostly at the global scale, because there are many climate efforts that involve individual regions and countries. Our vital signs are designed to be useful to the public, policymakers, the business community, and those working to implement the Paris climate agreement, the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.

Profoundly troubling signs from human activities include sustained increases in both human and ruminant livestock populations, per capita meat production, world gross domestic product, global tree cover loss, fossil fuel consumption, the number of air passengers carried, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and per capita CO2emissions since 2000 (figure 1supplemental file S2). Encouraging signs include decreases in global fertility (birth) rates (figure 1b), decelerated forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon (figure 1g), increases in the consumption of solar and wind power (figure 1h), institutional fossil fuel divestment of more than US$7 trillion (figure 1j), and the proportion of GHG emissions covered by carbon pricing (figure 1m). However, the decline in human fertility rates has substantially slowed during the last 20 years (figure 1b), and the pace of forest loss in Brazil's Amazon has now started to increase again (figure 1g). Consumption of solar and wind energy has increased 373% per decade, but in 2018, it was still 28 times smaller than fossil fuel consumption (combined gas, coal, oil; figure 1h). As of 2018, approximately 14.0% of global GHG emissions were covered by carbon pricing (figure 1m), but the global emissions-weighted average price per tonne of carbon dioxide was only around US$15.25 (figure 1n). A much higher carbon fee price is needed (IPCC 2018, section 2.5.2.1). Annual fossil fuel subsidies to energy companies have been fluctuating, and because of a recent spike, they were greater than US$400 billion in 2018 (figure 1o).

Especially disturbing are concurrent trends in the vital signs of climatic impacts (figure 2supplemental file S2). Three abundant atmospheric GHGs (CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide) continue to increase (see figure S1 for ominous 2019 spike in CO2), as does global surface temperature (figure 2a–2d). Globally, ice has been rapidly disappearing, evidenced by declining trends in minimum summer Arctic sea ice, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and glacier thickness worldwide (figure 2e–2h). Ocean heat content, ocean acidity, sea level, area burned in the United States, and extreme weather and associated damage costs have all been trending upward (figure 2i–2n). Climate change is predicted to greatly affect marine, freshwater, and terrestrial life, from plankton and corals to fishes and forests (IPCC 20182019). These issues highlight the urgent need for action.

Despite 40 years of global climate negotiations, with few exceptions, we have generally conducted business as usual and have largely failed to address this predicament (figure 1). The climate crisis has arrived and is accelerating faster than most scientists expected (figure 2, IPCC 2018). It is more severe than anticipated, threatening natural ecosystems and the fate of humanity (IPCC 2019). Especially worrisome are potential irreversible climate tipping points and nature's reinforcing feedbacks (atmospheric, marine, and terrestrial) that could lead to a catastrophic “hothouse Earth,” well beyond the control of humans (Steffen et al. 2018). These climate chain reactions could cause significant disruptions to ecosystems, society, and economies, potentially making large areas of Earth uninhabitable.

To secure a sustainable future, we must change how we live, in ways that improve the vital signs summarized by our graphs. Economic and population growth are among the most important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion (Pachauri et al. 2014, Bongaarts and O’Neill 2018); therefore, we need bold and drastic transformations regarding economic and population policies. We suggest six critical and interrelated steps (in no particular order) that governments, businesses, and the rest of humanity can take to lessen the worst effects of climate change. These are important steps but are not the only actions needed or possible (Pachauri et al. 2014, IPCC 20182019).

Energy

The world must quickly implement massive energy efficiency and conservation practices and must replace fossil fuels with low-carbon renewables (figure 1h) and other cleaner sources of energy if safe for people and the environment (figure S2). We should leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground (see the timelines in IPCC 2018) and should carefully pursue effective negative emissions using technology such as carbon extraction from the source and capture from the air and especially by enhancing natural systems (see “Nature” section). Wealthier countries need to support poorer nations in transitioning away from fossil fuels. We must swiftly eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels (figure 1o) and use effective and fair policies for steadily escalating carbon prices to restrain their use.

Short-lived pollutants

We need to promptly reduce the emissions of short-lived climate pollutants, including methane (figure 2b), black carbon (soot), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Doing this could slow climate feedback loops and potentially reduce the short-term warming trend by more than 50% over the next few decades while saving millions of lives and increasing crop yields due to reduced air pollution (Shindell et al. 2017). The 2016 Kigali amendment to phase down HFCs is welcomed.

Nature

We must protect and restore Earth's ecosystems. Phytoplankton, coral reefs, forests, savannas, grasslands, wetlands, peatlands, soils, mangroves, and sea grasses contribute greatly to sequestration of atmospheric CO2. Marine and terrestrial plants, animals, and microorganisms play significant roles in carbon and nutrient cycling and storage. We need to quickly curtail habitat and biodiversity loss (figure 1f–1g), protecting the remaining primary and intact forests, especially those with high carbon stores and other forests with the capacity to rapidly sequester carbon (proforestation), while increasing reforestation and afforestation where appropriate at enormous scales. Although available land may be limiting in places, up to a third of emissions reductions needed by 2030 for the Paris agreement (less than 2°C) could be obtained with these natural climate solutions (Griscom et al. 2017).

Food

Eating mostly plant-based foods while reducing the global consumption of animal products (figure 1c–d), especially ruminant livestock (Ripple et al. 2014), can improve human health and significantly lower GHG emissions (including methane in the “Short-lived pollutants” step). Moreover, this will free up croplands for growing much-needed human plant food instead of livestock feed, while releasing some grazing land to support natural climate solutions (see “Nature” section). Cropping practices such as minimum tillage that increase soil carbon are vitally important. We need to drastically reduce the enormous amount of food waste around the world.

Economy

Excessive extraction of materials and overexploitation of ecosystems, driven by economic growth, must be quickly curtailed to maintain long-term sustainability of the biosphere. We need a carbon-free economy that explicitly addresses human dependence on the biosphere and policies that guide economic decisions accordingly. Our goals need to shift from GDP growth and the pursuit of affluence toward sustaining ecosystems and improving human well-being by prioritizing basic needs and reducing inequality.

Population

Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day (figure 1a–b), the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity. There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss. These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women (Bongaarts and O’Neill 2018).

Conclusions

Mitigating and adapting to climate change while honoring the diversity of humans entails major transformations in the ways our global society functions and interacts with natural ecosystems. We are encouraged by a recent surge of concern. Governmental bodies are making climate emergency declarations. Schoolchildren are striking. Ecocide lawsuits are proceeding in the courts. Grassroots citizen movements are demanding change, and many countries, states and provinces, cities, and businesses are responding.

As the Alliance of World Scientists, we stand ready to assist decision-makers in a just transition to a sustainable and equitable future. We urge widespread use of vital signs, which will better allow policymakers, the private sector, and the public to understand the magnitude of this crisis, track progress, and realign priorities for alleviating climate change. The good news is that such transformative change, with social and economic justice for all, promises far greater human well-being than does business as usual. We believe that the prospects will be greatest if decision-makers and all of humanity promptly respond to this warning and declaration of a climate emergency and act to sustain life on planet Earth, our only home.

Contributing reviewers

Franz Baumann, Ferdinando Boero, Doug Boucher, Stephen Briggs, Peter Carter, Rick Cavicchioli, Milton Cole, Eileen Crist, Dominick A. DellaSala, Paul Ehrlich, Iñaki Garcia-De-Cortazar, Daniel Gilfillan, Alison Green, Tom Green, Jillian Gregg, Paul Grogan, John Guillebaud, John Harte, Nick Houtman, Charles Kennel, Christopher Martius, Frederico Mestre, Jennie Miller, David Pengelley, Chris Rapley, Klaus Rohde, Phil Sollins, Sabrina Speich, David Victor, Henrik Wahren, and Roger Worthington.

Funding

The Worthy Garden Club furnished partial funding for this project.

Project website

To view the Alliance of World Scientists website or to sign this article, go to https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu.

Supplemental material

A list of the signatories appears in supplemental file S1.

Author Biographical

William J. Ripple (bill.ripple@oregonstate.edu) and Christopher Wolf (christopher.wolf@oregonstate.edu) are affiliated with the Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society at Oregon State University, in Corvallis and contributed equally to the work. Thomas M. Newsome is affiliated with the School of Life and Environmental Sciences at The University of Sydney, in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Phoebe Barnard is affiliated with the Conservation Biology Institute, in Corvallis, Oregon, and with the African Climate and Development Initiative, at the University of Cape Town, in Cape Town, South Africa. William R. Moomaw is affiliated with The Fletcher School and the Global Development and Environment Institute, at Tufts University, in Medford, Massachusetts

11,258 scientist signatories from 153 countries (list in supplemental file S1)

References cited

Briggs
  
S
Kennel
  
CF
Victor
  
DG
2015
Planetary vital signs
Nature Climate Change
 
5
969
.

Bongaarts
  
J
O’Neill
  
BC
 
2018
Global warming policy: Is population left out in the cold?
 
Science
 
361
650
652
.

Griscom
  
BW
 et al. . 
2017
Natural climate solutions
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
114
11645
11650
.

[IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
2018
Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report
IPCC
.

[IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
2019
Climate Change and Land
IPCC
.

Pachauri
  
RK
 et al. . 
2014
Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Ripple
  
WJ
Smith
  
P
Haberl
  
H
Montzka
  
SA
McAlpine
  
C
Boucher
  
DH
2014
Ruminants, climate change, and climate policy
Nature Climate Change
 
4
2
5
.

Ripple
  
WJ
Wolf
  
C
Newsome
  
TM
Galetti
  
M
Alamgir
  
M
Crist
  
E
Mahmoud
  
MI
Laurance
  
WF
2017
World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice
BioScience
 
67
1026
1028
.

Shindell
  
D
Borgford-Parnell
  
N
Brauer
  
M
Haines
  
A
Kuylenstierna
  
J
Leonard
  
S
Ramanathan
  
V
Ravishankara
 
A
Amann
  
M
Srivastava
  
L
2017
A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits
Science
 
356
493
494
.

Steffen
  
W
 et al. . 
2018
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
 
115
8252
8259
.

Author notes

William J. Ripple and Christopher Wolf contributed equally to the work.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data

DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF INTELLIGENT? GET OVER IT!

     Do you consider yourself intelligent? If yes, how about explaining the concept of eternity?....... Not easy, is it?  I am a perpetual s...