Thursday, August 3, 2017

Stabilizing the Peptide protein may prevent Alzeimers.

Never before seen images of early stage Alzheimer’s disease
Researchers at Lund University in Sweden have used the MAX IV synchrotron in Lund – the strongest of its kind in the world - to produce images that predate the formation of toxic clumps of beta-amyloid, the protein believed to be at the root of Alzheimer’s disease. The unique images appear to contradict a previously unchallenged consensus. Instead of attempting to eliminate beta-amyloid, or so-called plaques, the researchers now suggest stabilizing the protein.

It is a long-held belief in the scientific community that the beta-amyloid plaques appear almost instantaneously. Hence the term “popcorn plaques”. The infrared spectroscopy images, however, revealed something entirely different.

The researchers could now see structural, molecular changes in the brain.

“No one has used this method to look at Alzheimer’s development before. The images tell us that the progression is slower than we thought and that there are steps in the development of Alzheimer’s disease that we know little about. This, of course, sparked our curiosity,” says Gunnar Gouras, professor in experimental neurology at Lund University and senior author of the study.

What was happening at this previously unknown phase? Through biochemical identification the first author of the study, Oxana Klementieva, was able to look closer at these early brain changes.

The results revealed another discovery. Namely, that the beta-amyloid did not appear as a single peptide, a widely held belief in the field, but as a unit of four peptides sticking together, a tetramer.

This breakthrough offers a new hypothesis to the cause of the disease. The abnormal separation of these four peptides could be the start of the beta-amyloid aggregation that later turns into plaques.

Source & further reading
http://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/never-before-seen-images-of-early-stage-alzheimers-disease

Journal article:
http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14726

Illustration: Per Uvdal

#neuroscience #alzheimersdisease #betaamyloid #amyloidplaques #research #medicine
Photo
Shared publiclyView activity

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Promising new Gene editing may alter birth defects.

AUGUST 2, 2017 / 1:01 PM / 11 HOURS AGO

U.S. scientists able to alter genes of human embryos

4 MIN READ
Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, Professor at Salk Institute's Gene Expression Laboratory and Jun Wu, Salk staff Scientist are pictured in this handout photo obtained by Reuters, August 2, 2017. Salk Institute/Handout via REUTERS
U.S. scientists have succeeded in altering the genes of a human embryo to correct a disease-causing mutation, making it possible to prevent the defect from being passed on to future generations.
The milestone, reported in a paper released online August 2 in Nature, was confirmed last week by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), which collaborated with the Salk Institute and Korea's Institute for Basic Science to use a technique known as CRISPR-Cas9 to correct a genetic mutation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Until now, published studies using the technique had been done in China with mixed results.
CRISPR-Cas9 works as a type of molecular scissors that can selectively trim away unwanted parts of the genome, and replace it with new stretches of DNA.
"We have demonstrated the possibility to correct mutations in a human embryo in a safe way and with a certain degree of efficiency," said Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte, a professor in Salk's Gene Expression Laboratory and a co-author of the study.
To increase the success rate, his team introduced the genome editing components along with sperm from a male with the targeted gene defect during the in vitro fertilization process. They found that the embryo used the available healthy copy of the gene to repair the mutated part.
The Salk/OHSU team also found that its gene correction did not cause any detectable mutations in other parts of the genome - a major concern for gene editing.
Still, the technology was not 100 percent successful. It increased the number of repaired embryos from 50%, which would have occurred naturally, to 74%.
The embryos, tested in the laboratory, were allowed to develop for only a few days.
"There is still much to be done to establish the safety of the methods, therefore they should not be adopted clinically," Robin Lovell-Badge, a professor at London's Francis Crick Institute who was not involved in the study, said in a statement.

'Utmost Caution'

Washington's National Academy of Sciences (NAS) earlier this year softened its previous opposition to the use of gene editing technology in human embryos, which has raised concerns it could be used to create so-called designer babies. There is also a fear of introducing unintended mutations into germline cells.
"No one is thinking about this because it is practically impossible at this point," Izpisua Belmonte said. "This is still very basic research ... let alone something as complex as what nature has done for millions and millions of years of evolution."
An international group of 11 organizations, including the American Society of Human Genetics and Britain's Wellcome Trust, on Wednesday issued a policy statement recommending against genome editing that culminates in human implantation and pregnancy, while supporting publicly funded research into its potential clinical applications.
Salk's Izpisua Belmonte, emphasizing that much more study is needed, said the most important practical application for the new technology could be in correcting genetic mutations in babies either in utero or right after they are born.
"It is crucial that we continue to proceed with the utmost caution, paying the highest attention to ethical considerations," he said.
Nature 2017.
This story was refiled Refiling with source link at end of story and modifications throughout for professional readers

"IF THE OCEANS DIE...WE DIE!" Captain Paul Watson.

WELCOME GREEN MONSTERS! WE'RE YOUR ONLINE GUIDE TO MAKING CONSCIOUS CHOICES THAT HELP PEOPLE, ANIMALS AND THE PLANET.
DOWNLOAD FOOD MONSTER: THE BIGGEST, BADDEST, YUMMIEST VEGAN FOOD APP!

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Lab grown meat will save animals from slaughterhouse.





WELCOME GREEN MONSTERS! WE'RE YOUR ONLINE GUIDE TO MAKING CONSCIOUS CHOICES THAT HELP PEOPLE, ANIMALS AND THE PLANET.
DOWNLOAD FOOD MONSTER: THE BIGGEST, BADDEST, YUMMIEST VEGAN FOOD APP!

More bad news for the animal agriculture industry! Foodnavigator reports that the CEO of a London-based investment banking firm that provides advice to growth-focused companies, Aquaa Partners, Paul Cuatrecasas thinks that lab-grown meat is a big threat to the animal agriculture industry.
Specifically, Cuatrecasas believes that the companies that grow animal feed that will face the greatest burden from lab-grown meat. “Executives at feed companies need to take this risk seriously,” Cuatrecasas says. “Even if they do not believe this future will actually come to pass, they need to admit it is feasible.” The investment banker believes there is increasing evidence that the future of food will be animal-free and he says it’s just a question of when not if.
Companies like Memphis Meats and Supermeat are setting out to create meat – without slaughtering a single animal, but as we shared just last month, food technology company Hampton Creek, makers of “Just Mayo” have entered the clean meat game, promising lab-grown meat to hit shelves just next year.
Memphis Meats has already succeeded at producing a lab-cultured meatball and chicken nugget, but they estimate it will take another four years until they’re ready to sell a product commercially. Given the speed at which Hampton Creek plans to get their product to market, this could be a major game changer for the clean meat sector.
And it seems like Cuatercasas thinks so too, believing that Hampton Creek is going to set off a chain reaction for other companies to bring their products to market as soon as possible. Cuatercasas believes that lab grown meat will make up a significant portion of people’s diets within just 10 to 15 years and urges animal feed companies to stay relevant.

“Faced with the choice between two types of meats: one that is cheaper, cleaner, and more environmentally friendly, and the other—which is not. I cannot see traditional meat winning out long term,” Cuatrecasas says. Lab grown meat uses 99 percent less land, emits 96 percent fewer greenhouse gases, consumes 96 percent less water and uses 45 percent less energy,according to a joint study by the Universities of Oxford and Amsterdam. 

Considering that The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that livestock production is responsible for 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions while other organizations like the Worldwatch Institute have estimated it could be as much as 51 percent, lab-grown meat offers a practical solution. Nearly one billion people suffering from hunger across the globe and as the population continues to mount to 9.7 billion by 2050, we simply won’t be able to sustain more people eating a diet high in animal products.
The question of how we’re going to meet the protein needs of the planet is rapidly becoming the biggest challenge of our time. It’s no secret that the developed world is obsessed with protein, with the average person in the U.S. consuming 103 grams per day, around double the actual recommended amount, two-thirds of which comes from animal sources. Naturally, the first step to building a more sustainable food system starts with consumers eating less meat and dairy – but there is a large percent of the population that will likely never give up their bacon cheeseburgers, which is where lab grown, or cultured meat can fill in the gaps.
Have questions about how lab-grown meat is being made and how it is that a fully lab-produced product could make it to grocery store shelves in just a years time? Check out the recent episode of #EatForThePlanet with Nil Zacharias, Bruce Friedrich, the Executive Director of the Good Food Institute (GFI) and founding partner of New Crop Capital, explains exactly how it can be done.
While we wait for lab-grown meat to hit the shelves, you can learn more about how you can use your food choices for the benefit of the environment and animals, by joining One Green Planet’s #EatForThePlanet movement. To find out more about companies in the cultured meat space who are pioneering the future of food, click here. 
Lead image source: Memphis Meats/Facebook

DO YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF INTELLIGENT? GET OVER IT!

     Do you consider yourself intelligent? If yes, how about explaining the concept of eternity?....... Not easy, is it?  I am a perpetual s...