Monday, June 3, 2019

Meet Christy Ferguson...Greenpeace director.

Exciting news! This week, Greenpeace Canada just named its new Executive Director.
Drumroll please …
Christy Ferguson!
A quietly badass leader with courage that just won’t quit, Christy has managed our Programs Department (aka the Strategy HQ for all our campaigns) for the last five years. Before that, she led the Arctic and Climate & Energy Campaigns. From leading with compassion to negotiating on the high seas, she’s a force to be reckoned with.
Seriously.
While sailing aboard a Greenpeace ship in the high Arctic, she was cool under threat of fire while negotiating with Russian authorities.
She helped turn a hard-hitting campaign against multinational company, Kimberly-Clark (the makers of Kleenex tissue) into a collaboration that resulted in major wins for ancient forests.
And a year and a half ago, she tackled the biggest challenge (and adventure) of all: motherhood.
Christy Ferguson and her baby, William (19 months old).
So, what’s next for Greenpeace with Christy steering the ship? Read on!

Congratulations on your new role! How does it feel?
 Thanks! It feels amazing. Since returning from parental leave in December I’ve experienced a renewed sense of purpose and a greater sense of compassion. Before coming back I’d worried that as a single mom, a big job would be too much to handle. But my desire to protect my son and safeguard his future is so incredibly motivating. And the wave of youth action around the world is so inspiring! And this planet is so incredible! I love going to work every day and collaborating with such talented staff to try to change the world.

Everyone’s got an origin story. What’s yours — how did you get involved in the environmental movement?
I was active in the peace movement in the lead-up to the Iraq war, and I met some Greenpeacers that way — on the streets of Toronto, protesting an unjust war. They had great energy and great ideas. They were so creative, even in the face of the terrifying political realities we were confronting. So my first involvement with Greenpeace grew out of my belief in the “peace” part of our mission. I learned more and got involved in the “green” later. As I continued to get to know the people behind Greenpeace, I was awed by their level of strategy and ambition, and by an organization that is led by its values. It’s really something special. Soon after, I took my first job as a part-time assistant on the sustainable agriculture campaign, and have been involved ever since.

Forest Rescue Station in Papua New Guinea where we helped demarcate Indigenous traditional territories threatened by industrial resource extraction.
Christy in her earlier Greenpeace days, participating in a Forest Rescue Station in Papua New Guinea where Greenpeace helped demarcate Indigenous traditional territories threatened by industrial resource extraction.© Christy Ferguson

You’ve gained a reputation for being cool under fire. One situation stands out in particular: your expedition to Russia as head of Greenpeace Canada’s Arctic campaign. Can you tell us about what happened with the Russian coast guard?
In 2013, I was on the Greenpeace ship, the Arctic Sunrise North of Russia, protesting preparations for dangerous offshore drilling. As we worked to expose what was happening in these remote Arctic waters to the world, it became clear that our protests were hitting a nerve — so much so that the Russian Coast Guard threatened to fire cannons at us if we did not stop.
They approached us and demanded we leave the area. We didn’t comply. We were in international waters and within our rights to be there. Plus, what oil companies were doing needed to be brought into the light of day. Out at sea, immersed in the spectacular environment we were working to protect, it felt so clear what was at stake and we were not about to back down.
Eventually, they boarded our ship — illegally, and under threat of violence. In the hours that followed, the ship’s captain and I sat in the cramped office of the ship with four Russian agents talking about what would happen next. There had been no time to prepare, and we had no agreed negotiation strategy. There was no one to consult, and no opportunity for sidebars. I was terrified and exhilarated all at once. We kept our cool, and kept bringing the conversation back to our mission and our values: that we were there to protect the Arctic, that the drilling was too dangerous, that there was no way to clean up a spill. That Greenpeace is independent and non-violent and speaks with the voices of our millions of supporters around the world. As tense as it was, I was calmed by my confidence in that mission and those values and by the knowledge that I was supported by the shipmates I’d grown so close to.
Things started calmly but as time went on, the Russian agents became more and more agitated, their demands more and more heated. They were receiving orders by radio, and appeared under pressure to make us comply. Their body language changed. Eventually, they threatened cannon fire again — imminently. It was clear to us they weren’t bluffing. So, we ended our protest.
Just weeks later, Russian authorities fired shots at our activists, illegally stormed the Arctic Sunrise in international waters, and imprisoned the entire crew including two Canadians in a crisis that became known as the Arctic 30.
Russian Authorities Board the Arctic Sunrise. © Will Rose / GreenpeaceNegotiating with Russian coast guard agents while campaigning for a ban on drilling in the high Arctic.

You’re a woman, a single mom, and at 42 you’re young for an executive director at time when the average CEO age is 58 and women make up less than 1 in 5 of Canadian CEOs. How do you hope to help promote women’s leadership and increase diversity in the environmental movement?
This is going to sound pretty corny, but one thing I’ve learned is that by being yourself, you allow other people to be themselves. Part of encouraging different kinds of people to take on leadership roles is showing that leadership doesn’t take one form. It doesn’t have one personality. It doesn’t have one background or education.
I’m soft spoken and I don’t love being the centre of attention. I’m more collaborative than controlling. I tell bad jokes. I love teen TV. I’m not the traditional picture of senior leadership. And that’s not just my own preconceptions talking! Coming up in this movement, I was told many times (most often by men in senior roles) that I would need to become someone else to succeed: louder, more forceful, more self-important. But I didn’t have it in me to change in that way. I didn’t want to. And I’m glad, because with the support and mentorship of some incredible, unconventional leaders I’ve been able to cultivate a style of leadership that’s open, empowering, and true to who I am as a person. And in the end, those qualities that some saw as liabilities turned out to be some of my greatest strengths.
In this role I want to support others to do the same, and to find their own ways of leading, too. Not by being like me, but by being themselves. This is just one of the ways in which I hope to lead Greenpeace with empathy and compassion as guiding principles.
"Greenpeace became iconic in the 1970s for the courageous actions of a group of young people determined to create a future free from violence, where nature and humanity can thrive,” said Christy Ferguson. “Today, eighty percent of our staff is under the age of 45 and we're witnessing an unstoppable wave of Gen Z and Millennial activism propel climate action to the top of the political agenda. I'll be focused on supporting these young people and making our organization more diverse and accessible. Together, we can counter divisive populist politics by leading with empathy to solve our common challenges."

How do you hope to transform Greenpeace Canada for a new generation of climate leaders?
It’s really about giving younger people space and support, letting themtransform the organization. I already see this happening within Greenpeace. We have so many talented, creative young staff, supporters, and volunteers. Sometimes we need to step back from our tried and true ideas about how things ought to be done and listen to their fresh (and sometimes far out!) ideas. Because let’s face it: none of us has figured out how to solve all the social and environmental crises before us. We need to stop pretending we have all the answers and try some new approaches. And a lot of the time, those new approaches are going to come from the people who have been pushed into the margins for too long.
I also think that as a movement, we need to become less judgmental. Again, none of us has all the answers. There are no perfect lives. There are no perfect politics. We need to invite everyone in and benefit from the diversity of experiences and ideas different people bring.
So, that’s it. Negotiating with the Russian coast guard? NBD. Nap time? Nailing it. Unconventional leadership? Finding her stride. Follow along on Twitter to see what’s next with this new mum and new head of everything at Greenpeace Canada

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jesse Firempong is a Communications Officer at Greenpeace Canada, living on Tla'amin territory in B.C. With Greenpeace, she helps tell the stories of environmental injustice (and solutions) in Canada and around the world. Jesse has a Master's in International Development and has worked on climate and human rights issues in Canada, Ghana, Botswana and Malawi. You can find her in the woods, with her nose in a book, or sassing pop culture with friends.
Jesse Firempong

Meet our new Executive Director!

Inbox
x

Anna & Brigid, Greenpeace Canada

May 31, 2019, 7:01 PM (3 days ago)
to me
Images are not displayed. Display images below - Always dis
play images from greenpeace.canada@act.greenpeace.org
Nelson,
We have some exciting news to share and we want you to be among the first to know. Following a global search, we are delighted to announce that Christy Ferguson will be Greenpeace Canada’s new Executive Director.
If Christy’s name is familiar, that’s likely because she’s been a part of Greenpeace Canada for more than 15 years. Beginning as a program assistant, Christy has played many roles in the organization: forest campaigner, Head of the Climate and Energy Campaign, Head of the Arctic Campaign, Program Director, and, for the last several months Interim Executive Director (a role that she’s performed brilliantly!).
This trajectory has given Christy a rare and overarching perspective on Greenpeace’s strengths and challenges, culture and people, as well as a clear vision for our future. She’s led and contributed to some of Greenpeace Canada’s most important campaigns to protect our planet and we’re thrilled she’s bringing her empathy, passion, dedication and courage to this important role at a critical time.
And it is critical a time. As we approach our 50th year of existence as an organization, Greenpeace is needed more than ever. This isn’t necessarily a good thing. The threats to climate, nature and peace are well-documented and accelerating at an alarming pace. But so too is our awareness of them, and the inspiring movement of people – particularly youth – taking action to address them.
Your participation in this movement is so very key and we are incredibly appreciative of the role you play. On behalf of the Board of directors, thank you for your support and your trust. With Christy leading a dedicated and talented team, with your support and that of thousands of other courageous and compassionate people cross Canada, we can still turn this crisis around to bring about the change and solutions our planet needs.
Read more about Christy here.
With hope and anticipation,
Brigid Rowan and Anna Crawford
Co-Chairs, Greenpeace Canada
We don't accept any money from companies or governments so we can be independent and challenge anyone who threatens the planet or peace. To help us keep fighting climate change, defending our oceans and protecting ancient forests, please make a regular donation. Thank you!
You can grow the movement for a green and peaceful future. Forward this email and share the signup link for our regular email updates and ways to take action.
This email was sent to: human4usbillions@gmail.com. If you no longer want to be in the loop with the latest news from these emails, we'll be sad, but you can adapt your preferences or unsubscribe here.
Greenpeace Canada, 33 Cecil Street, Toronto, ON M5T 1N1

Thursday, May 30, 2019


Gentle People:

The claim we are attempting to destroy the economy by redirecting money towards creating sustainable products and projects, is bogus! Totally false! The idea is to protect our air and water and food production and hey! Who's money is it anyway? Money is a power coupon created by our elected governments for the purpose of maintaining an economy based on the distribution of goods and services. It was never meant to be hoarded by a few corporate moguls in order for them to dictate how we so called 'consumers' survive. In fact company executives created the concept of consumerism in the first place for the purpose of helping themselves get very rich very fast!
The title of 'successful person' today is claimed by millionaires and multi-millionaires and some politicians who have by various means, managed to accumulate more money than they need for basic survival. More than one millionaire has become rich by converting natural resources into cheap destructible consumer products without understanding or caring how the destructive nature of his or her industry creates dangerous repercussions within and to our Biosphere!
We are not trying to take away personal success! We are simply trying to survive as best we can and all we ask today is that our industrial companies around the world take responsibility for their actions!
Would it not be nicer if you became a millionaire by growing and selling millions of fruit bearing trees and vegetable plants? How about building a recycling plant that converts millions of discarded rubber car tires into powder and that powder applied to maintaining existing roads and highways? Don't forget to remove the wire from the powdered tire. Metal has value and is worth recycling!

How about building water filtration plants here and around the world to help provide clean water for the desperate poor who are running out of drinking water? You can recycle tons of plastic by making thick water distribution pipes for countries without such pipes.


One good idea now in the works is to create plastic molecules that can be easily recycled back into usable plastic so that all plastic can be recycled and reused by the company who makes a product.

Creating stronger and better containers made from glass and metal and stronger plastic and then reclaiming the containers after a “consumer” has 'consumed' the contents” is an idea I can live with and so can you! The idea is now in progress and has been adopted by many large companies and it is called “Looping.” why not get into the loop?

How to Loop.
Remember the old milk bottle concept? Full glass milk bottles were left on door steps and empty bottles were collected for cleaning and reuse. One company was responsible for recycling and reusing the bottles. The same can be done by hundreds of companies for thousands of products around the world whether they be plastic or not.
The economy will not miss a beat and in fact will be more enjoyable for everybody. People will feel less cheated and exploited by greedy companies and that will be a good thing for everybody? The idea is to protect our air and our water and our food production. Mother Nature is delicate and is presently being beaten to death by uncaring industries around the world and all in the name of profit and success!

We can do better if we stop buying inexpensive products created to self destruct in order to keep selling more products. We can do better if we do not have a “throw away” society because products today are packaged from cheap but indestructible plastic presently found floating within our Oceans. What is less well known is that we are also breathing and eating tiny molecules of plastic carried by wind currents around the world.

Sometimes something may look like a quality product but also self destructs and rather than bothering to fight with the sales people to refund our money, we find it expedient to simply dump the broken product in a recycle bin and then go buy another cheap product. The sad fact is that the broken product does not get recycled by our local communities.
Our local municipal recycling plants and garbage dumps are full! There is no more room for our discarded products whether we try to recycle them or not using the current system.  We need the companies who make the products to take full responsibility and take back the packaging after the product they contained has been used.
If a product is made from: glass, metal, plastic or even rubber, the company who created the product, small or large, must take it back when the consumer who bought the product signals its end of use.

 It is difficult not to sound sarcastic but our so called brilliant and educated politicians and company CEO's are now sending our garbage to other countries who, by the way, will be delivering our garbage back to us.
 Here is a thought! Forget planning the quick demise of cheap products in order to maintain large profit margins. You honestly do not need millions of dollars. All that creates is jealousy! What you need is a good circle of friends and some honest love.

Thanks for reading!
Signed: Nelson Joseph Raglione
Executive director: The world friendly peace and ecology movement.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

From Shelly Fan at Singularity Hub.

realistic illustration human lungs heart future of health

New Progress in Stem-Cell-Free Regenerative Medicine

7850
809
Regenerative medicine and stem cells are often uttered within the same breath, for good reason.
In animal models, stem cells have reliably reversed brain damage from Parkinson’s disease, repaired severed spinal cords, or restored damaged tissue from diabetesstrokeblood cancersheart disease, or aging-related tissue damage. With the discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), in which skin and other tissue can be reversed into a stem cell-like state, the cells have further been adapted into bio-ink for 3D printing brand new organs.
Yet stem cells are hard to procure, manufacture, and grow. And unless they’re made from the patient’s own cell supply—massively upping production costs—they’re at risk of immune rejection or turning cancerous inside their new hosts.
Thinking outside the stem cell box, two teams have now explored alternative paths towards repairing damaged tissue, both inside and outside the body. The first, published in Nature, found that a tiny genetic drug fully restored heart function in a pig after an experimental heart attack.
Pig hearts are remarkably similar to human hearts in size, structure, and physiology, to the point that they may eventually become candidates for pig-to-human xenotransplants. Although it’ll “take some time before we can proceed to clinical trials,” said lead author Dr. Mauro Giacca from King’s College London, the drug—the first of its kind—is a promising move towards repairing heart damage directly inside patients.
The second study, outlined in Nature Communications, explores a radically different approach that restores damaged lungs, which can then be used for tissue transplantation. To address the pressing need for donor lungs, Dr. Matt Bachetta at Vanderbilt University and colleagues from Columbia University developed a new protocol that not only keeps donor pig lungs alive, but also repairs any damage sustained during the extraction process so that the organs meet every single criterion for transplantation.
Both ideas are universal in that they can potentially be expanded to other organs. Unlike stem cell treatments, they’re also “one size fits all” in that the therapies will likely benefit most patients without individual tailoring.

A Genetic Cure for Heart Attacks

To be clear, Giacca’s new treatment isn’t gene therapy, in that it doesn’t fundamentally change a heart’s genetic code.
Rather, it relies on weird little RNA fragments called microRNAs. Similar to RNA, which carries genetic code from DNA to our cells’ protein-making factories, these molecules are made up of four genetic letters and flow freely inside a cell.
Averaging just 22 letters, microRNAs powerfully control gene expression in that they can shut down a gene without changing its genetic code. Scientists don’t yet fully understand how microRNAs work. But humans have up to 600 different types of these regulators floating around our cells, and they’ve been linked to everything from cancer and kidney problems to brain development, transgenerational inheritance—and yes—heart disease.
These mysterious genetic drugs could meet a critical clinical need. Although modern medicine has ways to reduce damage from heart attacks, surviving patients still often retain permanent damage to the heart’s structure, Giacca explained. Unlike skin or liver cells, mature heart cells are stoic little buggers in that they don’t usually replenish themselves. This causes the heart to lose its ability to properly contract and pump blood, which eventually leads to heart failure.
Giacca’s team decided to see if they could kick mature heart cells back into dividing action, rather than forming scar tissue. Using a high-volume screen, they first looked through miRNAs that can stimulate mature heart cells to divide after a heart attack in mice. One promising candidate emerged: hsa-miRNA-199a-3p (yeah, catchy, I know).
Next, the team used a virus to deliver the microRNA candidate into the hearts of 25 pigs, which were subjected to an experimental heart attack that blocked blood flow to the heart for 90 minutes. The miRNA, restricted to only the heart, immediately worked its magic and shut down several genetic pathways. Although the heart still retained damage, measured two days following the heart attack, within a month it reduced scar tissue by 50 percent. The treated hearts were also far stronger in their ability to contract compared to non-treated hearts, and grew slightly in muscle size.
Under the microscope, the team found that the miRNA forced mature heart cells back into a younger state. The cells regained their ability to divide and supplement damaged tissue. It’s not an easy surgery: the team directly jabbed the heart 20 times with the virus to ensure that the organ evenly received the genetic drug.
The therapy also comes with a potentially troubling consequence. The team followed 10 pigs after the one-month mark. Although their heart functions readily improved, seven suddenly died from heart tremors within three to four weeks without any warning. Subsequent detective work revealed that it could be due to overgrowth of new heart cells. “The treatment needs careful dosing,” they concluded.
Despite these hiccups, the miRNA therapy is a welcome new addition to the heart regeneration family. “It is a very exciting moment for the field. After so many unsuccessful attempts at regenerating the heart using stem cells, which all have failed so far, for the first time we see real cardiac repair in a large animal,” said Giacca.

Living Lung Bioreactor

Bacchetta’s lung recovery team took a different approach. Rather than trying to directly repair lungs inside the body, they tackled another clinical problem: the lack of transplantable donor lungs.
Roughly 80 percent of donor lungs are too damaged for transplantation, said Bacchetta. Although there are many sources of trauma, including injuries from ventilators or fluid buildup inside the organ, the team focused on a major cause of damage: stomach contents.
Lungs are sensitive snowflakes. They’re extremely easily scuffed up by stuff that comes out of our stomachs, such as food particles, bile, gastric juices, and enzymes. If you’ve ever had a horrific hangover over the toilet…well, you know it burns. Usually our lungs can heal; but in the case of transplantation—right after death—they often don’t have the time to self-repair.
This lung shortage led Bacchetta’s team to look for alternative ideas. “We were … searching for a way to extend the ability to provide life-saving therapy to patients,” he said, a search that took seven years of banging their heads against a wall.
Then came the winning lightbulb moment: if man-made devices aren’t enough to repair lungs outside the body, what about the eventual recipient? After all, lungs don’t work alone—they thrive in a physiological milieu chock full of molecules that activate when the body senses injury.
“I decided, look, we’ve got to use the whole body. The only way to do that … was to use the potential donor recipient essentially as a bioreactor,” said Bacchetta.
The team first poured gastric acid into the lungs of an unconscious donor pig to mimic injury. After six hours, they extracted the damaged lung and placed it carefully into a warm, humidified sterile bowl—the organ chamber—and hooked the organ up to a ventilator. They then connected the lung’s blood vessels to the recipient’s circulation. This essentially uses the recipient to help break down toxic molecules in the injured lungs while supplying them with fresh nutrients and healing factors.
damaged lungs regeneration future of health
Macroscopic appearance of lungs throughout 36 h of ex vivo support. Image Credit: Brandon Guenthart/Columbia Engineering.
It sounds pretty gruesome, but the trick worked. When supplemented with a wash that rinsed out stomach juices, the lungs regenerated in just three days. Compared to non-treated lungs, their functions improved six-fold. The technique restored and maintained the function of donor lungs for up to 36 hours, but Bacchetta expects to further expand the “window” to days or even weeks.
“Our work has established a new benchmark in organ recovery,” said Bacchetta. “It has opened up new pathways for translational applications and basic science exploration.”
Neither study is perfect, but they represent new pathways into regenerative medicine outside stem cells. And when it comes to saving lives, it’s never good to put all eggs inside one (stem cell) basket, especially when the need is large, pressing, and unmet.
Image Credit: sciencepics / Shutterstock.com
809
Shelly Xuelai Fan is a neuroscientist-turned-science writer. She completed her PhD in neuroscience at the University of British Columbia, where she developed novel treatments for neurodegeneration. While studying biological brains, she became fascinated with AI and all things biotech. Following graduation, she moved to UCSF to study blood-based factors that rejuvenate aged brains. She is the ...

FOLLOW SHELLY:

   

  Hello my good friend Valdemar Oliveira! I am happy to hear you had a successfull heart operation.  I hope you live to be 110. I may not be...